You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Lyor Goldstein <lg...@apache.org> on 2018/10/01 06:49:57 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Mina SSHD 2.1.0
>> #2 is not an option imho. Given the amount of work that would be
needed to manually re-package and re-sign the distributions artifacts, i'd
go for #1 if this is considered a blocker.
Reasonable - I was only bringing it up so that when we decide how to
proceed we have all the relevant options
>> So if you go for a release (which I vote +1 in the current state of the
git tag, considering Lyor's explainations), be sure to add a note in the
Announce explaining why it does not build from the source package and what
to do to have it build.
>> Sounds perfect to me. I'll close the release tomorrow then.
Agreed...
Re: [VOTE] Release Mina SSHD 2.1.0
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
Lyor, would you mind writing the release annoucement ? I'll publish the
artifacts this morning, so we can send it later today.
Le lun. 1 oct. 2018 à 08:44, Lyor Goldstein <lg...@apache.org> a
écrit :
> >> #2 is not an option imho. Given the amount of work that would be
> needed to manually re-package and re-sign the distributions artifacts, i'd
> go for #1 if this is considered a blocker.
>
> Reasonable - I was only bringing it up so that when we decide how to
> proceed we have all the relevant options
>
> >> So if you go for a release (which I vote +1 in the current state of the
> git tag, considering Lyor's explainations), be sure to add a note in the
> Announce explaining why it does not build from the source package and what
> to do to have it build.
>
> >> Sounds perfect to me. I'll close the release tomorrow then.
>
> Agreed...
>
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet