You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Reynold Xin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/29 22:05:20 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-16804) Correlated subqueries containing LIMIT return incorrect results

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Reynold Xin updated SPARK-16804:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
Correlated subqueries with LIMIT could return incorrect results. The rule ResolveSubquery in the Analysis phase moves correlated predicates to a join predicates and neglect the semantic of the LIMIT.

Example:

{noformat}
Seq(1, 2).toDF("c1").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
Seq(1, 2).toDF("c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")

sql("select c1 from t1 where exists (select 1 from t2 where t1.c1=t2.c2 LIMIT 1)").show
+---+                                                                           
| c1|
+---+
|  1|
+---+
{noformat}

The correct result contains both rows from T1.

  was:
Correlated subqueries with LIMIT could return incorrect results. The rule ResolveSubquery in the Analysis phase moves correlated predicates to a join predicates and neglect the semantic of the LIMIT.

Example:

Seq(1, 2).toDF("c1").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
Seq(1, 2).toDF("c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")

sql("select c1 from t1 where exists (select 1 from t2 where t1.c1=t2.c2 LIMIT 1)").show
+---+                                                                           
| c1|
+---+
|  1|
+---+

The correct result contains both rows from T1.


> Correlated subqueries containing LIMIT return incorrect results
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-16804
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16804
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Nattavut Sutyanyong
>   Original Estimate: 72h
>  Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> Correlated subqueries with LIMIT could return incorrect results. The rule ResolveSubquery in the Analysis phase moves correlated predicates to a join predicates and neglect the semantic of the LIMIT.
> Example:
> {noformat}
> Seq(1, 2).toDF("c1").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
> Seq(1, 2).toDF("c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")
> sql("select c1 from t1 where exists (select 1 from t2 where t1.c1=t2.c2 LIMIT 1)").show
> +---+                                                                           
> | c1|
> +---+
> |  1|
> +---+
> {noformat}
> The correct result contains both rows from T1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org