You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@storm.apache.org by Abhishek Roy <ab...@gmail.com> on 2014/06/09 18:43:57 UTC
storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Hi,
I am quite new to storm and would be using this framework to re-start one
of our previous project.
I was wondering what would be the best practice to work with in terms of
storm latest version -
storm-0.9.0.1
<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/dj86w8ojecgsam7/storm-0.9.0.1.zip>
* or *apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
<http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/storm/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating.tar.gz>
I was hoping if I could get logical advice on why one should be preferred
over other at the current situation?
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek Roy
Re: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Posted by Abhishek Roy <ab...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your valuable input Dan. That was helpful in resolving the
initial uncertainty.
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek Roy
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Daniel Cruver <da...@cubrc.org>
wrote:
> Before reading the rest of this I do recommend you just use the newer
> version. The below and other emails are most likely more information then
> you ned to know.
>
>
>
> 0mq is GPL that might help you decide if you are making a Commercial or
> Government product. Where is Netty is Apache Licensed. I don't believe
> the Apache Storm community will want to support 0mq and if you want to
> future proof yourself. I am most likely confusing you with details but
> for you information the Apache release of Storm defaults to Netty, whereas
> the older release defaulted to 0mq.
>
>
>
> Storm-0.9.0.1 most likely has more installations just because
> 0.9.1-incubating is a newer releases. The only reason why the -incubating
> tab is on there is because Storm is making the transition into Apache and
> does not signify that this releases is any less stable then the older
> version.
>
>
>
> When you say integrating with other systems those other systems don't
> include Storm correct? If they do then you have to take that into account.
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* Abhishek Roy [mailto:abhishekroyn@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 09, 2014 3:04 PM
> *To:* user@storm.incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
>
>
>
> Thanks Daniel. This was helpful.
>
> But as you mentioned, I have no clue if I would be needing 0mq or Netty.
> The project I am re-starting was developed on *storm-0.9.0.1* initially and
> I would be responsible for establishing required environment setup and
> making valuable updates while integrating it with other systems.
>
> So, if there could be any additional information which could make the
> choice easier in this context? There seems good support available from
> online storm communities for 0.9.1-incubating. Does the same could be said
> for *storm-0.9.0.1?*
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Abhishek Roy
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Cruver <da...@cubrc.org>
> wrote:
>
> The incubation release is newer but they removed the 0mq transport layer.
> If you want to use 0mq with the apache incubation there is some
> additional work you must do to add it back. I do not work on the Apache
> Storm team but it looks like going forward they are dropping support for it.
>
>
>
> If you have no clue if you want 0mq or Netty then I would say go with the
> Apache Version (0.9.1-incubating). I will leave it to other to give you
> more justification why you may want 0mq or not.
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* Abhishek Roy [mailto:abhishekroyn@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 09, 2014 12:44 PM
> *To:* user@storm.incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am quite new to storm and would be using this framework to re-start one
> of our previous project.
>
> I was wondering what would be the best practice to work with in terms of
> storm latest version -
>
> storm-0.9.0.1
> <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/dj86w8ojecgsam7/storm-0.9.0.1.zip>
> * or *apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
> <http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/storm/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating.tar.gz>
>
>
>
> I was hoping if I could get logical advice on why one should be preferred
> over other at the current situation?
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Abhishek Roy
>
>
>
RE: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Posted by Daniel Cruver <da...@cubrc.org>.
Before reading the rest of this I do recommend you just use the newer version. The below and other emails are most likely more information then you ned to know.
0mq is GPL that might help you decide if you are making a Commercial or Government product. Where is Netty is Apache Licensed. I don’t believe the Apache Storm community will want to support 0mq and if you want to future proof yourself. I am most likely confusing you with details but for you information the Apache release of Storm defaults to Netty, whereas the older release defaulted to 0mq.
Storm-0.9.0.1 most likely has more installations just because 0.9.1-incubating is a newer releases. The only reason why the –incubating tab is on there is because Storm is making the transition into Apache and does not signify that this releases is any less stable then the older version.
When you say integrating with other systems those other systems don’t include Storm correct? If they do then you have to take that into account.
Dan
From: Abhishek Roy [mailto:abhishekroyn@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 3:04 PM
To: user@storm.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Thanks Daniel. This was helpful.
But as you mentioned, I have no clue if I would be needing 0mq or Netty. The project I am re-starting was developed on storm-0.9.0.1 initially and I would be responsible for establishing required environment setup and making valuable updates while integrating it with other systems.
So, if there could be any additional information which could make the choice easier in this context? There seems good support available from online storm communities for 0.9.1-incubating. Does the same could be said for storm-0.9.0.1?
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek Roy
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Cruver <da...@cubrc.org>> wrote:
The incubation release is newer but they removed the 0mq transport layer. If you want to use 0mq with the apache incubation there is some additional work you must do to add it back. I do not work on the Apache Storm team but it looks like going forward they are dropping support for it.
If you have no clue if you want 0mq or Netty then I would say go with the Apache Version (0.9.1-incubating). I will leave it to other to give you more justification why you may want 0mq or not.
Dan
From: Abhishek Roy [mailto:abhishekroyn@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 12:44 PM
To: user@storm.incubator.apache.org<ma...@storm.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Hi,
I am quite new to storm and would be using this framework to re-start one of our previous project.
I was wondering what would be the best practice to work with in terms of storm latest version -
storm-0.9.0.1<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/dj86w8ojecgsam7/storm-0.9.0.1.zip> or apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating<http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/storm/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating.tar.gz>
I was hoping if I could get logical advice on why one should be preferred over other at the current situation?
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek Roy
Re: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Posted by Abhishek Roy <ab...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Daniel. This was helpful.
But as you mentioned, I have no clue if I would be needing 0mq or Netty.
The project I am re-starting was developed on *storm-0.9.0.1* initially and
I would be responsible for establishing required environment setup and
making valuable updates while integrating it with other systems.
So, if there could be any additional information which could make the
choice easier in this context? There seems good support available from
online storm communities for 0.9.1-incubating. Does the same could be said
for *storm-0.9.0.1?*
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek Roy
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Cruver <da...@cubrc.org>
wrote:
> The incubation release is newer but they removed the 0mq transport layer.
> If you want to use 0mq with the apache incubation there is some
> additional work you must do to add it back. I do not work on the Apache
> Storm team but it looks like going forward they are dropping support for it.
>
>
>
> If you have no clue if you want 0mq or Netty then I would say go with the
> Apache Version (0.9.1-incubating). I will leave it to other to give you
> more justification why you may want 0mq or not.
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* Abhishek Roy [mailto:abhishekroyn@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 09, 2014 12:44 PM
> *To:* user@storm.incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am quite new to storm and would be using this framework to re-start one
> of our previous project.
>
> I was wondering what would be the best practice to work with in terms of
> storm latest version -
>
> storm-0.9.0.1
> <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/dj86w8ojecgsam7/storm-0.9.0.1.zip>
> * or *apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
> <http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/storm/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating.tar.gz>
>
>
>
> I was hoping if I could get logical advice on why one should be preferred
> over other at the current situation?
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Abhishek Roy
>
RE: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Posted by Daniel Cruver <da...@cubrc.org>.
The incubation release is newer but they removed the 0mq transport layer. If you want to use 0mq with the apache incubation there is some additional work you must do to add it back. I do not work on the Apache Storm team but it looks like going forward they are dropping support for it.
If you have no clue if you want 0mq or Netty then I would say go with the Apache Version (0.9.1-incubating). I will leave it to other to give you more justification why you may want 0mq or not.
Dan
From: Abhishek Roy [mailto:abhishekroyn@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 12:44 PM
To: user@storm.incubator.apache.org
Subject: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating
Hi,
I am quite new to storm and would be using this framework to re-start one of our previous project.
I was wondering what would be the best practice to work with in terms of storm latest version -
storm-0.9.0.1<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/dj86w8ojecgsam7/storm-0.9.0.1.zip> or apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating<http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/storm/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating.tar.gz>
I was hoping if I could get logical advice on why one should be preferred over other at the current situation?
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek Roy