You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues-all@impala.apache.org by "Fang-Yu Rao (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/08/02 00:51:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (IMPALA-12329) Access type of Ranger audit event being set up in more than one place inconsistently
Fang-Yu Rao created IMPALA-12329:
------------------------------------
Summary: Access type of Ranger audit event being set up in more than one place inconsistently
Key: IMPALA-12329
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-12329
Project: IMPALA
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Fang-Yu Rao
Assignee: Fang-Yu Rao
We found that for some queries, the access type of Ranger audit event could be set up in more than one place inconsistently.
For instance, take the TRUNCATE TABLE statement for example. During the authorization of this query, the access type of the corresponding Ranger audit event would be first set up to "update" at [RangerAuthorizationChecker#authorizeResource()|https://github.com/apache/impala/blob/master/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/authorization/ranger/RangerAuthorizationChecker.java#L664].
But later at [RangerAuthorizationChecker#updateAuditEvents()|https://github.com/apache/impala/blob/master/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/authorization/ranger/RangerAuthorizationChecker.java#L645], the access type will be set up to "insert" which is the value of privilege.name().toLowerCase().
We probably should not have to set up the access type differently in 2 places.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscribe@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-help@impala.apache.org