You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by ha...@apache.org on 2021/01/27 18:32:12 UTC

svn commit: r1885949 - /subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS

Author: hartmannathan
Date: Wed Jan 27 18:32:12 2021
New Revision: 1885949

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1885949&view=rev
Log:
* 1.10.x/STATUS: Move r1880192 and the r1881985 group to Approved

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS?rev=1885949&r1=1885948&r2=1885949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS Wed Jan 27 18:32:12 2021
@@ -32,24 +32,6 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: jamessan, stsp
 
- * r1880192
-   Fix issue #4862 "Merge: the resulting mergeinfo is non-deterministic".
-   Justification:
-     Non-deterministic merge result is bad.
-   Depends:
-     r1878997, r1879192, r1879474, r1879959 (Fix issue #4859)
-   Votes:
-     +1: julianfoad, stsp, jcorvel
-
- * r1881985, r1882105
-   Follow up to r1880192: Fix an EOL issue in test on Windows.
-   Justification:
-     We should test correctly on Windows environment, too.
-   Depends:
-     r1880192
-   Votes:
-     +1: jcorvel, stsp, hartmannathan
-
  * r1835049, r1882326
    Fix issue #4762 "authz doesn't combine global and repository rules"
    Justification:
@@ -80,3 +62,21 @@ Approved changes:
      release.py didn't catch this error when 1.14.0-rc1 release was created
    Votes:
      +1: stsp, jamessan, hartmannathan
+
+ * r1880192
+   Fix issue #4862 "Merge: the resulting mergeinfo is non-deterministic".
+   Justification:
+     Non-deterministic merge result is bad.
+   Depends:
+     r1878997, r1879192, r1879474, r1879959 (Fix issue #4859)
+   Votes:
+     +1: julianfoad, stsp, jcorvel
+
+ * r1881985, r1882105
+   Follow up to r1880192: Fix an EOL issue in test on Windows.
+   Justification:
+     We should test correctly on Windows environment, too.
+   Depends:
+     r1880192
+   Votes:
+     +1: jcorvel, stsp, hartmannathan