You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Karthik K <ka...@gmail.com> on 2010/08/02 08:01:06 UTC
Multiple solr servers Vs Katta
Hi,
I have about 20 indexes each of size around 30-35 GB. All of it is on one
machine and i want to make it searchable.
I can have about 5 solr servers each with 2-3 indexes merged and search on
different shards or use katta.
Please let me know which is the better option.
Thanks,
karthik
Re: Multiple solr servers Vs Katta
Posted by Karthik K <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I thought having around a TB of data to search is when katta should come
into picture.
Thanks a lot, can you please point me to or elaborate more on how to manage
increasing index. Any standard strategies?
Re: Multiple solr servers Vs Katta
Posted by Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>.
This is nowhere near the volume of data where you would have to use
Katta. Katta has much more limited search and configuration features-
it is more a very distributed version of Lucene than a search server.
Solr has added a lot of features over and above Lucene.
To have 2 query servers for each index, we have 2*20*35gb/5 = 280gb of
index per server. This is a large Solr but many run much larger
systems. This should run fine on a server with 24-32G of ram and at
least 3 fast (10k SATA) disks in a raid.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Karthik K <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have about 20 indexes each of size around 30-35 GB. All of it is on one
> machine and i want to make it searchable.
> I can have about 5 solr servers each with 2-3 indexes merged and search on
> different shards or use katta.
> Please let me know which is the better option.
>
> Thanks,
> karthik
>
--
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com