svn commit: r1146635 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

[ju...@apache.org]

Author: julianfoad
Date: Thu Jul 14 10:25:23 2011
New Revision: 1146635

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1146635&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Nominate r1146620; vote and approve r1146492 group.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1146635&r1=1146634&r2=1146635&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Thu Jul 14 10:25:23 2011
@@ -23,17 +23,15 @@ Candidate changes:
      +1: danielsh
      -0: cmpilato, rhuijben, gstein (problem is with callers,
                                      not implementation)
-     
- * r1146492, r1146555
-   Add const to a couple members of svn_client_info2_t
-   Justification:
-     We don't want clients to think they can modify the underlying
-     structures. We had similar problems with the svn_wc_status_t,
-     and it makes it hard to rev APIs when clients may be monkeying
-     with the data we pass along.
+
+ * r1146620
+   Simple consistency for the 'svn_client_info2_t' structure; no functional
+   change.  On the 'wc_info' member, remove 'struct' keyword, as we don't
+   use it in any other similar situation.
+   Notes:
+     This change also marks the doc string for Doxygen, an 'obvious fix'.
    Votes:
-     +1: gstein, rhuijben
-     +1: blair (voted on r1146492 only)
+     +1: julianfoad
 
 
 Approved changes:
@@ -70,3 +68,15 @@ Approved changes:
      Resolve regression and remove confusion by future callers.
    Votes:
      +1: rhuijben, gstein, stsp
+
+ * r1146492, r1146555
+   Add const to a couple members of svn_client_info2_t
+   Justification:
+     We don't want clients to think they can modify the underlying
+     structures. We had similar problems with the svn_wc_status_t,
+     and it makes it hard to rev APIs when clients may be monkeying
+     with the data we pass along.
+   Votes:
+     +1: gstein, rhuijben, julianfoad
+     +1: blair (voted on r1146492 only)
+