You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Sebb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/02/28 23:14:37 UTC
[jira] Created: (LEGAL-88) Options for prohibited works
Options for prohibited works
----------------------------
Key: LEGAL-88
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88
Project: Legal Discuss
Issue Type: Question
Reporter: Sebb
The previous (proposed) 3rd party policy [1] had some guidance on how to deal with dependencies on prohibited works - e.g. LGPL
This info. has not found its way into the Legal Previously Asked Questions page [2].
So what is the position?
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options
[2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-88) Options for prohibited works
Posted by "Sebb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000694#comment-13000694 ]
Sebb commented on LEGAL-88:
---------------------------
There are two different LGPL libraries [1] [2] that have been suggested for use with JMeter.
These would be used for optional functionality.
It should be easy enough to ensure that JMeter runs OK if the libraries are not present at run-time (we used to have to do this with JavaMail).
Likewise, excluding the dependent source files from builds should not be too difficult.
However, ideally we would like to release JMeter with all the source code compiled, which would mean the RM at least would need to download the jars.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50842
[2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-dev/201102.mbox/%3C4D6C1398.3070205@apache.org%3E
> Options for prohibited works
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-88
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> The previous (proposed) 3rd party policy [1] had some guidance on how to deal with dependencies on prohibited works - e.g. LGPL
> This info. has not found its way into the Legal Previously Asked Questions page [2].
> So what is the position?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options
> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-88) Options for prohibited works
Posted by "Ralph Goers (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000754#comment-13000754 ]
Ralph Goers commented on LEGAL-88:
----------------------------------
This seems either highly related to or a duplicate of LEGAL-54. That issue seems like it has agreement but hasn't been resolved.
> Options for prohibited works
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-88
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> The previous (proposed) 3rd party policy [1] had some guidance on how to deal with dependencies on prohibited works - e.g. LGPL
> This info. has not found its way into the Legal Previously Asked Questions page [2].
> So what is the position?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options
> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-88) Options for prohibited works
Posted by "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000685#comment-13000685 ]
Sam Ruby commented on LEGAL-88:
-------------------------------
Is this a hypothetical question?
> Options for prohibited works
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-88
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> The previous (proposed) 3rd party policy [1] had some guidance on how to deal with dependencies on prohibited works - e.g. LGPL
> This info. has not found its way into the Legal Previously Asked Questions page [2].
> So what is the position?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options
> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-88) Options for prohibited works
Posted by "Sebb (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13228892#comment-13228892 ]
Sebb commented on LEGAL-88:
---------------------------
On looking at this again, I don't think LEGAL-54 covers everything.
The specific issue that was covered in the original 3rd party page is bridge code [1].
This does not sem to be covered by the current "resolved" page.
[Or if it is covered, it's not obvious what the rules are]
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options-inproduct-may1
> Options for prohibited works
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-88
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> The previous (proposed) 3rd party policy [1] had some guidance on how to deal with dependencies on prohibited works - e.g. LGPL
> This info. has not found its way into the Legal Previously Asked Questions page [2].
> So what is the position?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options
> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-88) Options for prohibited works
Posted by "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000841#comment-13000841 ]
Sam Ruby commented on LEGAL-88:
-------------------------------
> This seems either highly related to or a duplicate of LEGAL-54.
Good.
> That issue seems like it has agreement
Agreed.
> but hasn't been resolved.
I guess it is awaiting somebody to commit the patch.
I'd like Legal Affairs to be run to the extent possible like a PMC; i.e. to treat the website as a product and to accept bug reports on it and to have committers do the work based on consensus. The VP is merely another participant but does have the additional responsibility to send boring reports to the board.
I miss Henri's participation here.
> Options for prohibited works
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-88
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-88
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> The previous (proposed) 3rd party policy [1] had some guidance on how to deal with dependencies on prohibited works - e.g. LGPL
> This info. has not found its way into the Legal Previously Asked Questions page [2].
> So what is the position?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options
> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org