You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Boris (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/01/23 20:49:59 UTC

[jira] Updated: (LANG-481) Possible race-conditions in hashCode of the range classes

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Boris updated LANG-481:
-----------------------

    Description: 
The hashCode() methods of the range classes look very suspicious to me. The value is lazily initialized, but the calculation is done _on the cached value. With some unlucky timing a caller may get an incomplete hash.

An unlucky sequence of Code could be something like
T1:        if (hashCode == 0)
T1:            hashCode = 17;
T2:         if (hashCode == 0)
T2:         return hashCode;
T1:            hashCode = 37 * hashCode...........

where T1 and T2 are different threads accessing the method in parallel and T2 gets the wrong hash "17".

Affected classes are

org.apache.commons.lang.math.DoubleRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.FloatRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.IntRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.LongRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.NumberRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.Range

Possible fix: calculate the hash on a temporary variable and finally assign it to the member

  was:
The hashCode() methods of the range classes look very suspicious to me. The value is lazily initialized, but the calculation is done _on the cached value. With some unlucky timing a caller may get an incomplete hash.

An unlucky sequence of Code could be something like
{{T1:        if (hashCode == 0)
T1:            hashCode = 17;
T2:         if (hashCode == 0)
T2:         return hashCode;
T1:            hashCode = 37 * hashCode...........}}

where T1 and T2 are different threads accessing the method in parallel and T2 gets the wrong hash "17".

Affected classes are

org.apache.commons.lang.math.DoubleRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.FloatRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.IntRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.LongRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.NumberRange
org.apache.commons.lang.math.Range

Possible fix: calculate the hash on a temporary variable and finally assign it to the member


> Possible race-conditions in hashCode of the range classes
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-481
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Boris
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The hashCode() methods of the range classes look very suspicious to me. The value is lazily initialized, but the calculation is done _on the cached value. With some unlucky timing a caller may get an incomplete hash.
> An unlucky sequence of Code could be something like
> T1:        if (hashCode == 0)
> T1:            hashCode = 17;
> T2:         if (hashCode == 0)
> T2:         return hashCode;
> T1:            hashCode = 37 * hashCode...........
> where T1 and T2 are different threads accessing the method in parallel and T2 gets the wrong hash "17".
> Affected classes are
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.DoubleRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.FloatRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.IntRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.LongRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.NumberRange
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.Range
> Possible fix: calculate the hash on a temporary variable and finally assign it to the member

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.