Re: Why Turbine security om classes didn't use om classes generatedby Torque?

[John McNally <jm...@collab.net>]

The security classes are generated by torque.

john mcnally

Mao.Qingwen@ing.com.au wrote:
> 
> I 've recently spent some time explored Turbine security service features. Some
> concerns:
> 
> *  Why Turbine security om classes(UserPeer, RolePeer, PermissionPeer etc)
> didn't use om classes generated by Torque?
> 
> My user, role, permission database table schema is a bit different as Turbine
> security table schema. I planed to port the Turbine Security service on my
> security tables. I've used Torque to generate my security om classes. But I
> failed to reuse those security services provided by Turbine since they are
> tightly coupled with those om classes which don't have the same API as generated
> by Torque. My next step is to build my security service from scratch so I could
> use my Torque generated om classes. I found out if I want to plug in my security
> model into Turbine, I have to change the source code of class
> TemplateSessionValidator. I am wondering whether are there any better ways to do
> that? Or am I on the right track?
> 
> * How do I configure my own security service to work together with Turbine?
> 
> Regards,
> Qingwen
> 
> NOTICE
> The information contained in this electronic mail message is privileged and
> confidential, and is intended only for use of the addressee.  If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction,
> distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by reply
> transmission and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>