You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Wangda Tan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/04/03 03:51:17 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-796) Allow for (admin) labels on nodes and
resource-requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13958434#comment-13958434 ]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-796:
---------------------------------
[~acmurthy], thanks for this patch, I’ve a few questions/suggestions for this implementation. Please forgive the ignorance if my suggestion makes no sense.
1. Is it good to put SchedulerLabelsManager.add/removeNode invoke to RMNodeImpl transition, which can be leveraged by CS/FS at the same time?
2. I’m wondering does it make sense to put SchedulerLabelsManager into RMContext?
3. Do we need consider labels of queue/application (not RR) will affect headroom of an application? (If yes, we need consider linking this to YARN-1198).
Thanks,
> Allow for (admin) labels on nodes and resource-requests
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-796
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Arun C Murthy
> Assignee: Arun C Murthy
> Attachments: YARN-796.patch
>
>
> It will be useful for admins to specify labels for nodes. Examples of labels are OS, processor architecture etc.
> We should expose these labels and allow applications to specify labels on resource-requests.
> Obviously we need to support admin operations on adding/removing node labels.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)