You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ratis.apache.org by "Tsz-wo Sze (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/12/04 21:04:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (RATIS-1945) INCONSISTENCY replies should be counted as errors.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tsz-wo Sze updated RATIS-1945:
------------------------------
Component/s: Leader
> INCONSISTENCY replies should be counted as errors.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-1945
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1945
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: gRPC, Leader
> Reporter: Tsz-wo Sze
> Assignee: Tsz-wo Sze
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.1.0
>
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> HDDS-9784 reported performance degradation even if the min-wait time (added by RATIS-1793) is set to 1ms. -It may be better to enforce the min-wait time only INCONSISTENCY replies.- (see the update below)
> (Update) After checked the code, found that RATIS-1836 added error retry policy. INCONSISTENCY replies should be counted as errors. Then, retry policy will delay the retries and the min-wait time can be set as 0ms in order to avoid performance penalty for the non-error case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)