You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@struts.apache.org by "Musachy Barroso (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/11/26 17:56:37 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (WW-2422) Merge SmartURLs and CodeBehind into Conventions plugin

     [ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Musachy Barroso resolved WW-2422.
---------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.2.x)
                   2.1.3

Convention plugin is in the sandbox, thanks Brian.

> Merge SmartURLs and CodeBehind into Conventions plugin
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-2422
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2422
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Ted Husted
>            Assignee: Brian Pontarelli
>             Fix For: 2.1.3
>
>
> I didn't see a ticket for this, so I opened one. Along with future work, this would cover  r607248, r607259, and r607376. 
> From dev@: 
> --------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>
> Date: Dec 29, 2007 12:41 AM
> Subject: Convention plugin
> To: Struts Developers List <de...@struts.apache.org>
> I have the first rough version of the convention plugin checked into the
> sandbox. Feel free to take a look. I haven't completed the unit tests
> yet, but I did get most of the Javadoc updated and added all the new
> features and support that was discussed.
> The most major change I'm trying to determine if I like is that you now
> do most everything on the action methods rather than the action class. I
> tend to like it more, but my only compliant is that I have to move my
> getters and setters below my action methods, which I don't normally do,
> so that I can see how the class is configured quickly after opening it
> in an editor. I guess I could go Groovy and drop the getters and
> setters. I've also tossed around the idea of some interceptor changes
> that would allow for actions with public/protected member variables.
> Anyways, feel free to check it all out and comment on things..... Oh,
> and there are a few outstanding bugs I've opened with XWork that I had
> to make locally (not a committer) in order to get things working
> correctly. So, if you run into issues, it could be those things. They
> had to do with the Guice container and type converters. I can send folks
> patch files until they are fixed on XWork trunk. Just send me an email
> if you want them.
> -bp

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.