You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Claudio Tagliola (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/03/02 13:44:58 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3755) receiveNoWait blocked on same mutex
as sending threads
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13220881#comment-13220881 ]
Claudio Tagliola commented on AMQ-3755:
---------------------------------------
Some more information: we run our broker mostly with default settings, except:
* ProducerFlowControl set to disabled for all queues and topics;
* AsyncSend set to true;
* CopyMessageOnSend set to false.
Clients are connecting through a failover(tcp) connection.
> receiveNoWait blocked on same mutex as sending threads
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-3755
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3755
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.5.0
> Reporter: Claudio Tagliola
>
> We have a server processing requests with an internal broker, connected with a vm transport. At a certain load and a high number of clients (approx. 350 clients) we see our server congested towards the internal VM broker. By looking at the stacktraces, it seems the incoming reading thread is waiting for a lock obtained by one of several other threads. This resulted in a short period (around 20-30 seconds) of very sluggish response times towards our clients. Response times of _any_ request through ActiveMQ go from a normal <50ms response time towards 2 seconds.
> Below is an extract of a stackdump while this happened. The first stacktrace is the thread trying to read incoming messages with a receiveNoWait, but it is blocked by the first thread, which the second thread owns. The third and fourth are two other processes, all waiting for the same mutex. These four processes are - from our server's perspective - not related to each other:
> {noformat}
> "RoundRobinReceiver" prio=10 tid=0x00007f1030483800 nid=0x2a59 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007f1075f5b000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:39)
> - waiting to lock <0x00000006bb6028b0> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.oneway(ResponseCorrelator.java:60)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.doAsyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1265)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.asyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1259)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.asyncSendPacket(ActiveMQSession.java:1863)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.sendAck(ActiveMQSession.java:2029)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.sendAck(ActiveMQSession.java:2024)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer.afterMessageIsConsumed(ActiveMQMessageConsumer.java:871)
> - locked <0x0000000715bda898> (a java.util.LinkedList)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer.receiveNoWait(ActiveMQMessageConsumer.java:617)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.jms.JMSRoundRobinListener.readFromConsumer(JMSRoundRobinListener.java:200)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.jms.JMSRoundRobinListener.roundRobinOverQueueConsumers(JMSRoundRobinListener.java:173)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.jms.JMSRoundRobinListener.receiveMessagesUntilInterrupt(JMSRoundRobinListener.java:109)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.jms.JMSRoundRobinListener.access$200(JMSRoundRobinListener.java:22)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.jms.JMSRoundRobinListener$RoundRobinReceiver.run(JMSRoundRobinListener.java:248)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> "ResultPublisher1" prio=10 tid=0x00007f0f20003000 nid=0x2b31 waiting on condition [0x00007f1060d59000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
> at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> - parking to wait for <0x00000006bb600410> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
> at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
> at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2043)
> at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.put(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:349)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.vm.VMTransport.oneway(VMTransport.java:94)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:40)
> - locked <0x00000006bb6028b0> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.oneway(ResponseCorrelator.java:60)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.doAsyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1265)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.asyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1259)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.send(ActiveMQSession.java:1744)
> - locked <0x00000006bc4bd448> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducer.send(ActiveMQMessageProducer.java:231)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport.send(ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport.java:241)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.jms.MappingResultPublisher.publishResponse(MappingResultPublisher.java:66)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.jms.QueuedMappingResultPublisher.executeJob(QueuedMappingResultPublisher.java:44)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.mapper.AbstractQueuedMappingJobExecutor.processJob(AbstractQueuedMappingJobExecutor.java:120)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.mapper.AbstractQueuedMappingJobExecutor.access$100(AbstractQueuedMappingJobExecutor.java:23)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.mapper.AbstractQueuedMappingJobExecutor$1.run(AbstractQueuedMappingJobExecutor.java:105)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> "RemoteResolveRequestService-ReplierThread-1" prio=10 tid=0x00007f1030485000 nid=0x2a5a waiting for monitor entry [0x00007f1075e5a000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:39)
> - waiting to lock <0x00000006bb6028b0> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.oneway(ResponseCorrelator.java:60)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.doAsyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1265)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.asyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1259)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.send(ActiveMQSession.java:1744)
> - locked <0x00000006baf131f8> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducer.send(ActiveMQMessageProducer.java:231)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport.send(ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport.java:300)
> at com.foo.bar.remoteservices.server.RpcReplierTask.sendReply(RpcReplierTask.java:129)
> at com.foo.bar.remoteservices.server.RpcReplierTask.run(RpcReplierTask.java:103)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> "PersistEntityMessagePublisherThread" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f1030b70800 nid=0x2a4b waiting for monitor entry [0x00007f1076c68000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:39)
> - waiting to lock <0x00000006bb6028b0> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.oneway(ResponseCorrelator.java:60)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.doAsyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1265)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.asyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1259)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.send(ActiveMQSession.java:1744)
> - locked <0x00000006bc542e90> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducer.send(ActiveMQMessageProducer.java:231)
> at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport.send(ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport.java:241)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.sendMessage(PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.java:140)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.sendMessage(PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.java:132)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.forwardMessagesToTopic(PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.java:101)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.access$000(PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.java:22)
> at com.foo.bar.impl.server.services.PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher$1.run(PersistEntityMessageBackgroundPublisher.java:49)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> {noformat}
> My question is: why is the receiving of messages blocked by the other threads and why do they share a single mutex? Is there anything I can do to alleviate this problem?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira