You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> on 2011/03/07 12:26:32 UTC
QPID-3115: candidate for 0.10?
I have completed fixes to the c++ client for QPID-3115 (making it more
consistent with the python connection options).
I believe this is a low risk set of changes and would be useful to users
of Qpid 0.10 and would therefore suggest they could be merged on to the
0.10 release branch. However they are not critical in anyway, so this is
not essential.
Any thoughts or opinions?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
RE: QPID-3115: candidate for 0.10?
Posted by Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com>.
Ok, I'm in favor of including this for 0.10 as long as the user is
tipped off somehow via the release notes.
-Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon Sim [mailto:gsim@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 7:54 AM
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: QPID-3115: candidate for 0.10?
>
>
> On 03/07/2011 12:32 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
> > Hi Gordon,
> >
> >> I have completed fixes to the c++ client for QPID-3115 (making it
> >> more consistent with the python connection options).
> >>
> >> I believe this is a low risk set of changes and would be useful to
> >> users of Qpid 0.10 and would therefore suggest they could be merged
> >> on to the
> >> 0.10 release branch. However they are not critical in anyway,
> >> so this is
> >> not essential.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts or opinions?
> >
> > Consistency is good. Is there any place the change is
> documented for
> > the unsuspecting user?
>
> I've update the programming guide in line with these changes.
> However it
> doesn't describe the change itself, just the final state. I think the
> JIRA (and thus release notes) would be the best place to describe the
> change. The commit logs attached to the JIRA do that to some
> extent, but
> I can add an explicit comment also.
>
> > Will this break 0.8 applications?
>
> The old names are still supported. However where previously
> unrecognised
> options were silently ignored, now they will cause an exception.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: QPID-3115: candidate for 0.10?
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 03/07/2011 12:32 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
> Hi Gordon,
>
>> I have completed fixes to the c++ client for QPID-3115
>> (making it more
>> consistent with the python connection options).
>>
>> I believe this is a low risk set of changes and would be
>> useful to users
>> of Qpid 0.10 and would therefore suggest they could be merged
>> on to the
>> 0.10 release branch. However they are not critical in anyway,
>> so this is
>> not essential.
>>
>> Any thoughts or opinions?
>
> Consistency is good. Is there any place the change is documented for the
> unsuspecting user?
I've update the programming guide in line with these changes. However it
doesn't describe the change itself, just the final state. I think the
JIRA (and thus release notes) would be the best place to describe the
change. The commit logs attached to the JIRA do that to some extent, but
I can add an explicit comment also.
> Will this break 0.8 applications?
The old names are still supported. However where previously unrecognised
options were silently ignored, now they will cause an exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
RE: QPID-3115: candidate for 0.10?
Posted by Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com>.
Hi Gordon,
> I have completed fixes to the c++ client for QPID-3115
> (making it more
> consistent with the python connection options).
>
> I believe this is a low risk set of changes and would be
> useful to users
> of Qpid 0.10 and would therefore suggest they could be merged
> on to the
> 0.10 release branch. However they are not critical in anyway,
> so this is
> not essential.
>
> Any thoughts or opinions?
Consistency is good. Is there any place the change is documented for the
unsuspecting user? Will this break 0.8 applications?
-Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org