You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by Harkishan Singh <ha...@gmail.com> on 2014/03/11 09:38:27 UTC
Scoring mechanism not working in jena-text 1.0.0
Hi,
I download the source code of jena-text version 1.0.0 and found that
mechanism for finding score is not implemented (went through this file
TextQueryPF.java) where as in LARQ this mechanism was there.
I'm not sure whether in version 1.0.1 they have implemented it.
I executed this query but didn't got any score.
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX text: <http://jena.apache.org/text#>
SELECT ?s ?score
{?s text:query ("xyz" ?score ). }
Does any one have an idea whether in latest version 1.0.1 they have
implemented it or not.
Thanks,
Harkishan Singh
Re: Scoring mechanism not working in jena-text 1.0.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 23/07/14 16:37, Willie Milnor wrote:
> Has there been any progress on implementing scoring in jena-text?
Willie - would you like to develop a patch to add this to jena-text? As
an open source project, it's contributions that drive progress.
Andy
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/14 11:20, Harkishan Singh wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Andy Seaborne for the reply.
>>>
>>> Can I use the same approach for finding score as we have in LARQ
>>> framework.
>>> I mean by reusing some part of LARQ code??
>>>
>>
>> LARQ is completely different internally from jena-text. Even the Lucene
>> document index is different. The code can't be reused but the way it
>> handles property functions is similar.
>>
>> It shouldn't be too hard to add score handling to jena-text (for Lucene
>> and for Solr) if you want to have a go at doing that. TextQueryPF is the
>> place for catching text:query.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/03/14 08:38, Harkishan Singh wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I download the source code of jena-text version 1.0.0 and found that
>>>>> mechanism for finding score is not implemented (went through this file
>>>>> TextQueryPF.javaTextQueryPF.java) where as in LARQ this mechanism was
>>>>> there.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure whether in version 1.0.1 they have implemented it.
>>>>> I executed this query but didn't got any score.
>>>>>
>>>>> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
>>>>> PREFIX text: <http://jena.apache.org/text#>
>>>>> SELECT ?s ?score
>>>>> {?s text:query ("xyz" ?score ). }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Things in the triple object position are argument to the property
>>>> function
>>>> - they need to be bound, they are not "out" parameters so score there is
>>>> used to limit the results (not that it's implemented IIRC - awaiting a
>>>> contribution).
>>>>
>>>> The intended design is that the subject position is used for output of
>>>> the
>>>> function (if already bound, it's effective a test of the right value).
>>>>
>>>> So it would be
>>>>
>>>> { (?s ?score) text:query ("xyz"). }
>>>>
>>>> but again not yet implemented.
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does any one have an idea whether in latest version 1.0.1 they have
>>>>> implemented it or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Harkishan Singh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Scoring mechanism not working in jena-text 1.0.0
Posted by Willie Milnor <mi...@gmail.com>.
Has there been any progress on implementing scoring in jena-text?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/03/14 11:20, Harkishan Singh wrote:
>
>> Thanks Andy Seaborne for the reply.
>>
>> Can I use the same approach for finding score as we have in LARQ
>> framework.
>> I mean by reusing some part of LARQ code??
>>
>
> LARQ is completely different internally from jena-text. Even the Lucene
> document index is different. The code can't be reused but the way it
> handles property functions is similar.
>
> It shouldn't be too hard to add score handling to jena-text (for Lucene
> and for Solr) if you want to have a go at doing that. TextQueryPF is the
> place for catching text:query.
>
> Andy
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/03/14 08:38, Harkishan Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>> I download the source code of jena-text version 1.0.0 and found that
>>>> mechanism for finding score is not implemented (went through this file
>>>> TextQueryPF.javaTextQueryPF.java) where as in LARQ this mechanism was
>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure whether in version 1.0.1 they have implemented it.
>>>> I executed this query but didn't got any score.
>>>>
>>>> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
>>>> PREFIX text: <http://jena.apache.org/text#>
>>>> SELECT ?s ?score
>>>> {?s text:query ("xyz" ?score ). }
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Things in the triple object position are argument to the property
>>> function
>>> - they need to be bound, they are not "out" parameters so score there is
>>> used to limit the results (not that it's implemented IIRC - awaiting a
>>> contribution).
>>>
>>> The intended design is that the subject position is used for output of
>>> the
>>> function (if already bound, it's effective a test of the right value).
>>>
>>> So it would be
>>>
>>> { (?s ?score) text:query ("xyz"). }
>>>
>>> but again not yet implemented.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does any one have an idea whether in latest version 1.0.1 they have
>>>> implemented it or not.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Harkishan Singh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Willie
Re: Scoring mechanism not working in jena-text 1.0.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 11/03/14 11:20, Harkishan Singh wrote:
> Thanks Andy Seaborne for the reply.
>
> Can I use the same approach for finding score as we have in LARQ framework.
> I mean by reusing some part of LARQ code??
LARQ is completely different internally from jena-text. Even the Lucene
document index is different. The code can't be reused but the way it
handles property functions is similar.
It shouldn't be too hard to add score handling to jena-text (for Lucene
and for Solr) if you want to have a go at doing that. TextQueryPF is
the place for catching text:query.
Andy
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/14 08:38, Harkishan Singh wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I download the source code of jena-text version 1.0.0 and found that
>>> mechanism for finding score is not implemented (went through this file
>>> TextQueryPF.javaTextQueryPF.java) where as in LARQ this mechanism was there.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure whether in version 1.0.1 they have implemented it.
>>> I executed this query but didn't got any score.
>>>
>>> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
>>> PREFIX text: <http://jena.apache.org/text#>
>>> SELECT ?s ?score
>>> {?s text:query ("xyz" ?score ). }
>>>
>>
>> Things in the triple object position are argument to the property function
>> - they need to be bound, they are not "out" parameters so score there is
>> used to limit the results (not that it's implemented IIRC - awaiting a
>> contribution).
>>
>> The intended design is that the subject position is used for output of the
>> function (if already bound, it's effective a test of the right value).
>>
>> So it would be
>>
>> { (?s ?score) text:query ("xyz"). }
>>
>> but again not yet implemented.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>>> Does any one have an idea whether in latest version 1.0.1 they have
>>> implemented it or not.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harkishan Singh
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Scoring mechanism not working in jena-text 1.0.0
Posted by Harkishan Singh <ha...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Andy Seaborne for the reply.
Can I use the same approach for finding score as we have in LARQ framework.
I mean by reusing some part of LARQ code??
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/03/14 08:38, Harkishan Singh wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I download the source code of jena-text version 1.0.0 and found that
>> mechanism for finding score is not implemented (went through this file
>> TextQueryPF.java) where as in LARQ this mechanism was there.
>>
>> I'm not sure whether in version 1.0.1 they have implemented it.
>> I executed this query but didn't got any score.
>>
>> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
>> PREFIX text: <http://jena.apache.org/text#>
>> SELECT ?s ?score
>> {?s text:query ("xyz" ?score ). }
>>
>
> Things in the triple object position are argument to the property function
> - they need to be bound, they are not "out" parameters so score there is
> used to limit the results (not that it's implemented IIRC - awaiting a
> contribution).
>
> The intended design is that the subject position is used for output of the
> function (if already bound, it's effective a test of the right value).
>
> So it would be
>
> { (?s ?score) text:query ("xyz"). }
>
> but again not yet implemented.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>> Does any one have an idea whether in latest version 1.0.1 they have
>> implemented it or not.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harkishan Singh
>>
>>
>
Re: Scoring mechanism not working in jena-text 1.0.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 11/03/14 08:38, Harkishan Singh wrote:
> Hi,
> I download the source code of jena-text version 1.0.0 and found that
> mechanism for finding score is not implemented (went through this file
> TextQueryPF.java) where as in LARQ this mechanism was there.
>
> I'm not sure whether in version 1.0.1 they have implemented it.
> I executed this query but didn't got any score.
>
> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
> PREFIX text: <http://jena.apache.org/text#>
> SELECT ?s ?score
> {?s text:query ("xyz" ?score ). }
Things in the triple object position are argument to the property
function - they need to be bound, they are not "out" parameters so score
there is used to limit the results (not that it's implemented IIRC -
awaiting a contribution).
The intended design is that the subject position is used for output of
the function (if already bound, it's effective a test of the right value).
So it would be
{ (?s ?score) text:query ("xyz"). }
but again not yet implemented.
Andy
>
> Does any one have an idea whether in latest version 1.0.1 they have
> implemented it or not.
>
> Thanks,
> Harkishan Singh
>