Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6420) [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test

[Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>]

In message
<3b...@mail.gmail.com>, Nathan
Beyer writes:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it is EMMA's report.
>
> I was able to figure out that.

:-)

> > Maybe we should find a place to put these reports. So we can know
> > exactly what test coverage rate we have got for each module
>
> It's the integration into the build system that's of interest.

I've temporarily placed a copy of the baseline results at:

   http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/emma/

But I strongly agree with Nathan, it would be very, very helpful to get
this work integrated with the rest of the build system.  In particular,
it would then enable us to make use of the hudson emma plugin so we have
regular reports and can track progress.

I'm happy to help to achieve this goal.  Perhaps as a first step, the
current method for producing the report could be documented/described?

Regards,
 Mark.

Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6420) [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test

[regis xu <xu...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mark Hindess
<ma...@googlemail.com>wrote:

>
> In message
> <3b...@mail.gmail.com>, Nathan
> Beyer writes:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think it is EMMA's report.
> >
> > I was able to figure out that.
>
> :-)
>
> > > Maybe we should find a place to put these reports. So we can know
> > > exactly what test coverage rate we have got for each module
> >
> > It's the integration into the build system that's of interest.
>
> I've temporarily placed a copy of the baseline results at:
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/emma/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehindessm/emma/>
>
> But I strongly agree with Nathan, it would be very, very helpful to get
> this work integrated with the rest of the build system.  In particular,
> it would then enable us to make use of the hudson emma plugin so we have
> regular reports and can track progress.
>
> I'm happy to help to achieve this goal.  Perhaps as a first step, the
> current method for producing the report could be documented/described?
>
> Regards,
>  Mark.
>
>
> [1] describe the details. And Sean have done some work to integrate Emma to
BTI [2], but I'm not clear about the current status.

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/coverageEMMA
[2] http://markmail.org/thread/3vqgijetuieh2a2a