You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@fluss.apache.org by "fresh-borzoni (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/02/06 03:02:01 UTC

[PR] [TASK-240] Fire-and-forget behaviour for effecient batching [fluss-rust]

fresh-borzoni opened a new pull request, #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/pull/258

   <!--
   *Thank you very much for contributing to Fluss - we are happy that you want to help us improve Fluss. To help the community review your contribution in the best possible way, please go through the checklist below, which will get the contribution into a shape in which it can be best reviewed.*
   
   ## Contribution Checklist
   
     - Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [GitHub issue](https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/issues). Exceptions are made for typos in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no issue.
   
     - Name the pull request in the format "[component] Title of the pull request", where *[component]* should be replaced by the name of the component being changed. Typically, this corresponds to the component label assigned to the issue (e.g., [kv], [log], [client], [flink]). Skip *[component]* if you are unsure about which is the best component.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
   
     - Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean verify` passes.
   
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from multiple issues.
   
   
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes or typos)**
   -->
   
   ### Purpose
   
   <!-- Linking this pull request to the issue -->
   Linked issue: close #xxx
   
   <!-- What is the purpose of the change -->
   
   ### Brief change log
   
   <!-- Please describe the changes made in this pull request and explain how they address the issue -->
   
   ### Tests
   
   <!-- List UT and IT cases to verify this change -->
   
   ### API and Format
   
   <!-- Does this change affect API or storage format -->
   
   ### Documentation
   
   <!-- Does this change introduce a new feature -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [TASK-240] Fire-and-forget behaviour for efficient batching [fluss-rust]

Posted by "fresh-borzoni (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
fresh-borzoni commented on PR #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/pull/258#issuecomment-3857740402

   We may wish to refactor queueing to use sync to avoid `await?` on queueing, it would match rdkafka, but better in separate followup PR.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [TASK-240] Fire-and-forget behaviour for efficient batching [fluss-rust]

Posted by "fresh-borzoni (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
fresh-borzoni commented on PR #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/pull/258#issuecomment-3857705085

   @luoyuxia @leekeiabstraction PTAL 🙏 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [TASK-240] Fire-and-forget behaviour for efficient batching [fluss-rust]

Posted by "luoyuxia (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
luoyuxia commented on PR #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/pull/258#issuecomment-3857803733

   > We may wish to refactor queueing to use sync to avoid `await?` on queueing, it would match rdkafka, but better in separate followup PR.
   
   Agree on it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [TASK-240] Fire-and-forget behaviour for efficient batching [fluss-rust]

Posted by "luoyuxia (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
luoyuxia merged PR #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/pull/258


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [TASK-240] Fire-and-forget behaviour for efficient batching [fluss-rust]

Posted by "fresh-borzoni (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
fresh-borzoni commented on PR #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/pull/258#issuecomment-3860794472

   Created an issue for this: https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/issues/263


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org