You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> on 2004/09/01 09:57:20 UTC
URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
I saw in CVS,
that URI for Struts-Faces points
also to Jakarta:
<uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
@struts-el:
only tiles-el points to jakarta
(in Struts 1.2.3)
<uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
<uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
<uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
<uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
Regards,
Matthias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
>
>
> The taglib URI for struts-el is
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
>
> Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
>
> Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the
> other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
>
> HTH,
>
> Kunal
>
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> >Martin,
> >
> >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> uploaded. The JDK
> >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> is still
> >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> >
> >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> Struts 1.2.2
> >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the plan
> >then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> >
> >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> >
> >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> >
> >Niall
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the following
> >>>
> >>>
> >major
> >
> >
> >>>problems:
> >>>
> >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> >>>
> >>>
> >validator
> >
> >
> >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib distros come from
> >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> target builds
> >>everything at once.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ Pity nobody
> >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things consistently:
> >>>
> >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> >>>
> >>>
> >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> >
> >
> >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> and files
> >>>
> >>>
> >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> system, and
> >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> I see none
> >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> other way?
> >>Not sure.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> but I would
> >>>
> >>>
> >say we
> >
> >
> >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> release and cut
> >>>a
> >>>
> >>>
> >new
> >
> >
> >>>one.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a new release
> >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> cvs.apache.org.
> >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> people have
> >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Martin Cooper
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Niall
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Nicolas De Loof <ni...@capgemini.com>.
I may had attached a patch for this to deserve any credit ;-)
Thanks
Nico.
> Nico,
>
> I've corrected the comment, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Also, my apologies - I should have referred to the bug and credited you in
> the CVS log message, but I forgot :-(
>
> Sorry
>
> Niall
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nicolas De Loof" <ni...@capgemini.com>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
>
>
> >
> > Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from a JSP <%
> taglib %> directive without having to set a
> > <taglib> element in web.xml.
> >
> > Notice I submited a ticket about tiles.dtd that uses
> jakarta.apache.org/struts.
> >
> > Nico.
> >
> >
> > > Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've updated this
> in
> > > CVS.
> > >
> > > Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was under the
> > > impression that these URI's should point to a publicly available copy of
> the
> > > tld and but there aren't copies either on struts.apache.org or
> > > jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
> > >
> > > Niall
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
> > > To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
> > > Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
> > >
> > >
> > > > I saw in CVS,
> > > >
> > > > that URI for Struts-Faces points
> > > > also to Jakarta:
> > > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > @struts-el:
> > > > only tiles-el points to jakarta
> > > > (in Struts 1.2.3)
> > > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> > > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> > > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> > > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > > > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> > > > >
> > > > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> > > > >
> > > > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the
> > > > > other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> > > > >
> > > > > HTH,
> > > > >
> > > > > Kunal
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Martin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> > > > > uploaded. The JDK
> > > > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> > > > > is still
> > > > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> > > > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> > > > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> > > > > Struts 1.2.2
> > > > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the
> plan
> > > > > >then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Niall
> > > > > >
> > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> > > > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> > > > > >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the
> following
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >major
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>problems:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >validator
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib distros come from
> > > > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> > > > > target builds
> > > > > >>everything at once.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> > > > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ Pity nobody
> > > > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> > > > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things consistently:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> > > > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> > > > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> > > > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> > > > > and files
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> > > > > system, and
> > > > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> > > > > I see none
> > > > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> > > > > other way?
> > > > > >>Not sure.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> > > > > but I would
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >say we
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> > > > > release and cut
> > > > > >>>a
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >new
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>one.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a new release
> > > > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> > > > > cvs.apache.org.
> > > > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> > > > > people have
> > > > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>--
> > > > > >>Martin Cooper
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>Niall
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > Our name has changed. Please update your address book to the following
> format: "recipient@capgemini.com".
> >
> > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
> and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
> person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute,
> or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in
> error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
> message.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Our name has changed. Please update your address book to the following format: "recipient@capgemini.com".
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
Nico,
I've corrected the comment, thanks for pointing this out.
Also, my apologies - I should have referred to the bug and credited you in
the CVS log message, but I forgot :-(
Sorry
Niall
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicolas De Loof" <ni...@capgemini.com>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
>
> Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from a JSP <%
taglib %> directive without having to set a
> <taglib> element in web.xml.
>
> Notice I submited a ticket about tiles.dtd that uses
jakarta.apache.org/struts.
>
> Nico.
>
>
> > Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've updated this
in
> > CVS.
> >
> > Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was under the
> > impression that these URI's should point to a publicly available copy of
the
> > tld and but there aren't copies either on struts.apache.org or
> > jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
> > To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
> > Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
> >
> >
> > > I saw in CVS,
> > >
> > > that URI for Struts-Faces points
> > > also to Jakarta:
> > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
> > >
> > >
> > > @struts-el:
> > > only tiles-el points to jakarta
> > > (in Struts 1.2.3)
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> > > >
> > > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> > > >
> > > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the
> > > > other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > > Kunal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> > > > uploaded. The JDK
> > > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> > > > is still
> > > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> > > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> > > > >
> > > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> > > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> > > > Struts 1.2.2
> > > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the
plan
> > > > >then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> > > > >
> > > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> > > > >
> > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> > > > >
> > > > >Niall
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> > > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> > > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> > > > >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the
following
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >major
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>problems:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >validator
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib distros come from
> > > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> > > > target builds
> > > > >>everything at once.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> > > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ Pity nobody
> > > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> > > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things consistently:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> > > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> > > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> > > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> > > > and files
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> > > > system, and
> > > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> > > > I see none
> > > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> > > > other way?
> > > > >>Not sure.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> > > > but I would
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >say we
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> > > > release and cut
> > > > >>>a
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >new
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>one.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a new release
> > > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> > > > cvs.apache.org.
> > > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> > > > people have
> > > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>--
> > > > >>Martin Cooper
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Niall
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
> Our name has changed. Please update your address book to the following
format: "recipient@capgemini.com".
>
> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute,
or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
message.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Kris Schneider <kr...@dotech.com>.
To help avoid that sort of confusion, I've taken to using a "urn:" scheme
instead of an "http:" scheme for my taglibs. As an example, URIs for Struts
taglibs could look like:
urn:x-taglib:org.apache.struts.bean
urn:x-taglib:org.apache.struts.html
Where "x-taglib" is the URN Namespace ID. Not sure that it's that big a deal but
I like the fact that it's a name as opposed to a location.
Quoting Nicolas De Loof <ni...@capgemini.com>:
>
> Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from a JSP <%
> taglib %> directive without having to set a
> <taglib> element in web.xml.
>
> Notice I submited a ticket about tiles.dtd that uses
> jakarta.apache.org/struts.
>
> Nico.
>
>
> > Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've updated this
> in
> > CVS.
> >
> > Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was under the
> > impression that these URI's should point to a publicly available copy of
> the
> > tld and but there aren't copies either on struts.apache.org or
> > jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
> > To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
> > Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
> >
> >
> > > I saw in CVS,
> > >
> > > that URI for Struts-Faces points
> > > also to Jakarta:
> > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
> > >
> > >
> > > @struts-el:
> > > only tiles-el points to jakarta
> > > (in Struts 1.2.3)
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> > > >
> > > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> > > >
> > > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the
> > > > other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > > Kunal
--
Kris Schneider <ma...@dotech.com>
D.O.Tech <http://www.dotech.com/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Nicolas De Loof <ni...@capgemini.com>.
Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from a JSP <% taglib %> directive without having to set a
<taglib> element in web.xml.
Notice I submited a ticket about tiles.dtd that uses jakarta.apache.org/struts.
Nico.
> Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've updated this in
> CVS.
>
> Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was under the
> impression that these URI's should point to a publicly available copy of the
> tld and but there aren't copies either on struts.apache.org or
> jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
>
> Niall
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
> Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
>
>
> > I saw in CVS,
> >
> > that URI for Struts-Faces points
> > also to Jakarta:
> > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
> >
> >
> > @struts-el:
> > only tiles-el points to jakarta
> > (in Struts 1.2.3)
> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > >
> > >
> > > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> > >
> > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> > >
> > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the
> > > other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > Kunal
> > >
> > >
> > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > >
> > > >Martin,
> > > >
> > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> > > uploaded. The JDK
> > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> > > is still
> > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> > > >
> > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> > > Struts 1.2.2
> > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the plan
> > > >then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> > > >
> > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> > > >
> > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> > > >
> > > >Niall
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> > > >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the following
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >major
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>problems:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >validator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib distros come from
> > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> > > target builds
> > > >>everything at once.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ Pity nobody
> > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things consistently:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> > > and files
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> > > system, and
> > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> > > I see none
> > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> > > other way?
> > > >>Not sure.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> > > but I would
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >say we
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> > > release and cut
> > > >>>a
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >new
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>one.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a new release
> > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> > > cvs.apache.org.
> > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> > > people have
> > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> > > >>
> > > >>--
> > > >>Martin Cooper
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Niall
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Our name has changed. Please update your address book to the following format: "recipient@capgemini.com".
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
Thanks Matthias.
I've updated the jsps.
Niall
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
> Niall,
>
> thanks for fixing it,
> but now in JSPs are wrong URIs...
>
> here are the JSPs, that refer to Struts-Faces-Tags
> (if you want, I will create a patch for the JSPs, but it
> *only* copy-paste-issue for the URI..., not really a patch, isn't it?)
>
> contrib/struts-faces/web
> -example/
> -logon.jsp
> -mainMenu.jsp
> -registration.jsp
> -subscription.jsp
>
> -example2/
> -footer.jsp
> -header.jsp
> -layout.jsp
> -layout1.jsp
> -loggedoff.jsp
> -loggedon.jsp
> -logon.jsp
> -mainMenu.jsp
> -registration.jsp
> -subscription.jsp
>
> -systest
> -context.jsp
> -context1.jsp
> -logon.jsp
> -logon1.jsp
> -simple.jsp
>
>
>
> hope I didn't missed one ... :-)
>
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pemberton@blueyonder.co.uk]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 10:50 AM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead
> > in the Water?)
> >
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've
> > updated this in CVS.
> >
> > Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was
> > under the impression that these URI's should point to a
> > publicly available copy of the tld and but there aren't
> > copies either on struts.apache.org or
> > jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
> > To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
> > Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
> >
> >
> > > I saw in CVS,
> > >
> > > that URI for Struts-Faces points
> > > also to Jakarta:
> > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
> > >
> > >
> > > @struts-el:
> > > only tiles-el points to jakarta
> > > (in Struts 1.2.3) <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> > > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> > > >
> > > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> > > >
> > > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the other
> > > > taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > > Kunal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> > > > uploaded. The JDK
> > > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> > > > is still
> > > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> > > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> > > > >
> > > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> > > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> > > > Struts 1.2.2
> > > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the
> > > > >plan then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> > > > >
> > > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> > > > >
> > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> > > > >
> > > > >Niall
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> > > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> > > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> > > > >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the
> > > > >>>following
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >major
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>problems:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >validator
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib
> > distros come from
> > > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> > > > target builds
> > > > >>everything at once.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> > > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{
> > Pity nobody
> > > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> > > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things
> > consistently:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> > > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> > > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> > > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> > > > and files
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> > > > system, and
> > > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> > > > I see none
> > > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> > > > other way?
> > > > >>Not sure.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> > > > but I would
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >say we
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> > > > release and cut
> > > > >>>a
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >new
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>>one.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a
> > new release
> > > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> > > > cvs.apache.org.
> > > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> > > > people have
> > > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>--
> > > > >>Martin Cooper
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Niall
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >--
> > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>.
Niall,
thanks for fixing it,
but now in JSPs are wrong URIs...
here are the JSPs, that refer to Struts-Faces-Tags
(if you want, I will create a patch for the JSPs, but it
*only* copy-paste-issue for the URI..., not really a patch, isn't it?)
contrib/struts-faces/web
-example/
-logon.jsp
-mainMenu.jsp
-registration.jsp
-subscription.jsp
-example2/
-footer.jsp
-header.jsp
-layout.jsp
-layout1.jsp
-loggedoff.jsp
-loggedon.jsp
-logon.jsp
-mainMenu.jsp
-registration.jsp
-subscription.jsp
-systest
-context.jsp
-context1.jsp
-logon.jsp
-logon1.jsp
-simple.jsp
hope I didn't missed one ... :-)
Regards,
Matthias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pemberton@blueyonder.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 10:50 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead
> in the Water?)
>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've
> updated this in CVS.
>
> Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was
> under the impression that these URI's should point to a
> publicly available copy of the tld and but there aren't
> copies either on struts.apache.org or
> jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
>
> Niall
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
> Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
>
>
> > I saw in CVS,
> >
> > that URI for Struts-Faces points
> > also to Jakarta:
> > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
> >
> >
> > @struts-el:
> > only tiles-el points to jakarta
> > (in Struts 1.2.3) <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > >
> > >
> > > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> > >
> > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> > >
> > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the other
> > > taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > Kunal
> > >
> > >
> > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > >
> > > >Martin,
> > > >
> > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> > > uploaded. The JDK
> > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> > > is still
> > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> > > >
> > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> > > Struts 1.2.2
> > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the
> > > >plan then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> > > >
> > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> > > >
> > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> > > >
> > > >Niall
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> > > >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the
> > > >>>following
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >major
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>problems:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >validator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib
> distros come from
> > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> > > target builds
> > > >>everything at once.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{
> Pity nobody
> > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things
> consistently:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> > > and files
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> > > system, and
> > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> > > I see none
> > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> > > other way?
> > > >>Not sure.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> > > but I would
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >say we
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> > > release and cut
> > > >>>a
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >new
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>one.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a
> new release
> > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> > > cvs.apache.org.
> > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> > > people have
> > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> > > >>
> > > >>--
> > > >>Martin Cooper
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Niall
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >--
> > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>.
> but there aren't
> copies either on struts.apache.org or
> jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
jup, but in struts.jar$/META-INF/tlds
there are the *.tlds
like for JSF:
-->
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" prefix="h" %>
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" prefix="f" %>
Matze
> Niall
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
> Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
>
>
> > I saw in CVS,
> >
> > that URI for Struts-Faces points
> > also to Jakarta:
> > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
> >
> >
> > @struts-el:
> > only tiles-el points to jakarta
> > (in Struts 1.2.3) <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > >
> > >
> > > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> > >
> > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> > >
> > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the other
> > > taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > Kunal
> > >
> > >
> > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > >
> > > >Martin,
> > > >
> > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> > > uploaded. The JDK
> > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> > > is still
> > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> > > >
> > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> > > Struts 1.2.2
> > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the
> > > >plan then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> > > >
> > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> > > >
> > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> > > >
> > > >Niall
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> > > >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the
> > > >>>following
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >major
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>problems:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >validator
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib
> distros come from
> > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> > > target builds
> > > >>everything at once.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{
> Pity nobody
> > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things
> consistently:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> > > and files
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> > > system, and
> > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> > > I see none
> > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> > > other way?
> > > >>Not sure.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> > > but I would
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >say we
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> > > release and cut
> > > >>>a
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >new
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>>one.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a
> new release
> > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> > > cvs.apache.org.
> > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> > > people have
> > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> > > >>
> > > >>--
> > > >>Martin Cooper
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Niall
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >--
> > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've updated this in
CVS.
Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was under the
impression that these URI's should point to a publicly available copy of the
tld and but there aren't copies either on struts.apache.org or
jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
Niall
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
> I saw in CVS,
>
> that URI for Struts-Faces points
> also to Jakarta:
> <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri>
>
>
> @struts-el:
> only tiles-el points to jakarta
> (in Struts 1.2.3)
> <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri>
> <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri>
> <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri>
> <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri>
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:kunalp@carsales.com.au]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> >
> >
> > The taglib URI for struts-el is
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el
> >
> > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el
> >
> > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the
> > other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Kunal
> >
> >
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >
> > >Martin,
> > >
> > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you
> > uploaded. The JDK
> > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar
> > is still
> > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib"
> > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-)
> > >
> > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
> > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the
> > Struts 1.2.2
> > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the plan
> > >then the JDK issues would have been caught.
> > >
> > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
> > >
> > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
> > >
> > >Niall
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Martin Cooper" <mf...@gmail.com>
> > >To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
> > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
> > >><ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the following
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >major
> > >
> > >
> > >>>problems:
> > >>>
> > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >validator
> > >
> > >
> > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one).
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib distros come from
> > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release'
> > target builds
> > >>everything at once.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses
> > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ Pity nobody
> > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to
> > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things consistently:
> > >>>
> > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/
> > >
> > >
> > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/
> > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts
> > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src
> > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories
> > and files
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local
> > system, and
> > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly.
> > I see none
> > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some
> > other way?
> > >>Not sure.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS
> > but I would
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >say we
> > >
> > >
> > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality
> > release and cut
> > >>>a
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >new
> > >
> > >
> > >>>one.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a new release
> > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to
> > cvs.apache.org.
> > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if
> > people have
> > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful.
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>Martin Cooper
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Niall
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org