You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by "Skogen, Espen" <es...@jpmorgan.com> on 2012/01/12 13:21:04 UTC
Flex and Maven
Hi all,
How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now that we get going?
JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos for their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex project used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available from the Apache maven repo.
Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer that - it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
E:)
________________________________
Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Espen,
this was already commented in other thread and seems is some of the
features many people want to be in this new Apache Flex journey (maybe one
of the most important things to take into account).
2012/1/12 Skogen, Espen <es...@jpmorgan.com>
> Hi all,
>
> How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now that we
> get going?
> JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos for
> their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex project
> used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available from
> the Apache maven repo.
>
> Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer that -
> it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
>
> E:)
>
> ________________________________
> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P.
> Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T:
> +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>
>
>
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
--
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F: +34 912 35 57 77
CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
Avd. del General Perón, 32
Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
28020 Madrid
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Scott Delamater <sc...@gmail.com>.
Heh, of course. Now I just feel silly...
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Skogen, Espen <es...@jpmorgan.com>wrote:
> Apache has it's own maven repo. I certainly wouldn't encourage using SVN
> for a maven repo simulation:)
>
> It's available here: http://repository.apache.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P.
> Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T:
> +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Delamater [mailto:scott.delamater@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2012 15:11
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Flex and Maven
>
> One consideration, though, is that Apache doesn't allow binaries in the
> source code. (Or maybe I've misunderstood some of the rules?) So our swcs
> would need to live in some other repo, which may be outside the
> responsibilities of this group. (Although it does seem like a good
> "extracurricular" activity for this group.)
>
> sD
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Gautam Pandey <gk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 Yes we need better maven support for flex. Because of unavailability
> of
> > maven support we r not migrating to newer version.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Gautam
> > On Jan 13, 2012 5:34 AM, "Scott Delamater" <sc...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I agree, this would be a huge add for enterprise work.
> > >
> > > Especially with the recent XSS patch fiasco, having artifacts for the
> "A"
> > > variants of the SDKs available would've been a big help for our team at
> > > Shutterfly. I assume other enterprise consumers have generated similar
> > > artifacts, and assuming we were all willing to share those artifacts, I
> > > could see it being mutually beneficial.
> > >
> > > sD
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Remi P <rp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > It's really a major point for entreprise developments that Flex SDK
> > > > artifacts can be deployed on central repo
> > > > Just for example, the last Adobe release of Flex SDK 4.6 has not yet
> > been
> > > > deployed on sonatype repository
> > > >
> > > > Remi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, John Childress <
> > > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
> > > > > <mi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven
> > > support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gredbug@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > > > > > > <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts,
> > now
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > we get going?
> > > > > > > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and
> > > Flexmojos
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache
> Flex
> > > > > project
> > > > > > > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately
> > > available
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > the Apache maven repo.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who
> > prefer
> > > > > that
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > > it would just simplify the process for everybody using
> Flexmojos.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at
> > it.
> > > > I'd
> > > > > > > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Michel Boudreau
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." -
> Unofficial
> > > > motto
> > > > > of
> > > > > > the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > John Childress
> > > > > 713-234-0427
> > > > > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>
RE: Flex and Maven
Posted by "Skogen, Espen" <es...@jpmorgan.com>.
Apache has it's own maven repo. I certainly wouldn't encourage using SVN for a maven repo simulation:)
It's available here: http://repository.apache.org/
Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Delamater [mailto:scott.delamater@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 January 2012 15:11
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flex and Maven
One consideration, though, is that Apache doesn't allow binaries in the
source code. (Or maybe I've misunderstood some of the rules?) So our swcs
would need to live in some other repo, which may be outside the
responsibilities of this group. (Although it does seem like a good
"extracurricular" activity for this group.)
sD
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Gautam Pandey <gk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 Yes we need better maven support for flex. Because of unavailability of
> maven support we r not migrating to newer version.
>
> Thanks
> Gautam
> On Jan 13, 2012 5:34 AM, "Scott Delamater" <sc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I agree, this would be a huge add for enterprise work.
> >
> > Especially with the recent XSS patch fiasco, having artifacts for the "A"
> > variants of the SDKs available would've been a big help for our team at
> > Shutterfly. I assume other enterprise consumers have generated similar
> > artifacts, and assuming we were all willing to share those artifacts, I
> > could see it being mutually beneficial.
> >
> > sD
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Remi P <rp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > It's really a major point for entreprise developments that Flex SDK
> > > artifacts can be deployed on central repo
> > > Just for example, the last Adobe release of Flex SDK 4.6 has not yet
> been
> > > deployed on sonatype repository
> > >
> > > Remi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, John Childress <
> > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
> > > > <mi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven
> > support.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > > > > > <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts,
> now
> > > > that
> > > > > > we get going?
> > > > > > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and
> > Flexmojos
> > > > for
> > > > > > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex
> > > > project
> > > > > > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately
> > available
> > > > > from
> > > > > > the Apache maven repo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who
> prefer
> > > > that
> > > > > -
> > > > > > it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at
> it.
> > > I'd
> > > > > > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Michel Boudreau
> > > > >
> > > > > "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." - Unofficial
> > > motto
> > > > of
> > > > > the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > John Childress
> > > > 713-234-0427
> > > > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
RE: Flex and Maven
Posted by Web DoubleFx <we...@hotmail.com>.
That's would be nice for all the "A" versions too
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Dirk Eismann <bo...@googlemail.com>.
true, no binaries in the SVN - but the ASF itself hosts a Maven repo:
https://repository.apache.org so the SWCs will be published there as
artifacts.
Dirk.
2012/1/13 Scott Delamater <sc...@gmail.com>:
> One consideration, though, is that Apache doesn't allow binaries in the
> source code. (Or maybe I've misunderstood some of the rules?) So our swcs
> would need to live in some other repo, which may be outside the
> responsibilities of this group. (Although it does seem like a good
> "extracurricular" activity for this group.)
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Scott Delamater <sc...@gmail.com>.
One consideration, though, is that Apache doesn't allow binaries in the
source code. (Or maybe I've misunderstood some of the rules?) So our swcs
would need to live in some other repo, which may be outside the
responsibilities of this group. (Although it does seem like a good
"extracurricular" activity for this group.)
sD
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Gautam Pandey <gk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 Yes we need better maven support for flex. Because of unavailability of
> maven support we r not migrating to newer version.
>
> Thanks
> Gautam
> On Jan 13, 2012 5:34 AM, "Scott Delamater" <sc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I agree, this would be a huge add for enterprise work.
> >
> > Especially with the recent XSS patch fiasco, having artifacts for the "A"
> > variants of the SDKs available would've been a big help for our team at
> > Shutterfly. I assume other enterprise consumers have generated similar
> > artifacts, and assuming we were all willing to share those artifacts, I
> > could see it being mutually beneficial.
> >
> > sD
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Remi P <rp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > It's really a major point for entreprise developments that Flex SDK
> > > artifacts can be deployed on central repo
> > > Just for example, the last Adobe release of Flex SDK 4.6 has not yet
> been
> > > deployed on sonatype repository
> > >
> > > Remi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, John Childress <
> > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
> > > > <mi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven
> > support.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > > > > > <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts,
> now
> > > > that
> > > > > > we get going?
> > > > > > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and
> > Flexmojos
> > > > for
> > > > > > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex
> > > > project
> > > > > > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately
> > available
> > > > > from
> > > > > > the Apache maven repo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who
> prefer
> > > > that
> > > > > -
> > > > > > it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at
> it.
> > > I'd
> > > > > > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Michel Boudreau
> > > > >
> > > > > "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." - Unofficial
> > > motto
> > > > of
> > > > > the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > John Childress
> > > > 713-234-0427
> > > > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Gautam Pandey <gk...@gmail.com>.
+1 Yes we need better maven support for flex. Because of unavailability of
maven support we r not migrating to newer version.
Thanks
Gautam
On Jan 13, 2012 5:34 AM, "Scott Delamater" <sc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I agree, this would be a huge add for enterprise work.
>
> Especially with the recent XSS patch fiasco, having artifacts for the "A"
> variants of the SDKs available would've been a big help for our team at
> Shutterfly. I assume other enterprise consumers have generated similar
> artifacts, and assuming we were all willing to share those artifacts, I
> could see it being mutually beneficial.
>
> sD
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Remi P <rp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > It's really a major point for entreprise developments that Flex SDK
> > artifacts can be deployed on central repo
> > Just for example, the last Adobe release of Flex SDK 4.6 has not yet been
> > deployed on sonatype repository
> >
> > Remi
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, John Childress <
> john.childress@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
> > > <mi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven
> support.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > > > > <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now
> > > that
> > > > > we get going?
> > > > > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and
> Flexmojos
> > > for
> > > > > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex
> > > project
> > > > > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately
> available
> > > > from
> > > > > the Apache maven repo.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer
> > > that
> > > > -
> > > > > it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
> > > > >
> > > > > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at it.
> > I'd
> > > > > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michel Boudreau
> > > >
> > > > "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." - Unofficial
> > motto
> > > of
> > > > the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > John Childress
> > > 713-234-0427
> > > john.childress@gmail.com
> > >
> >
>
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Scott Delamater <sc...@gmail.com>.
I agree, this would be a huge add for enterprise work.
Especially with the recent XSS patch fiasco, having artifacts for the "A"
variants of the SDKs available would've been a big help for our team at
Shutterfly. I assume other enterprise consumers have generated similar
artifacts, and assuming we were all willing to share those artifacts, I
could see it being mutually beneficial.
sD
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Remi P <rp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> It's really a major point for entreprise developments that Flex SDK
> artifacts can be deployed on central repo
> Just for example, the last Adobe release of Flex SDK 4.6 has not yet been
> deployed on sonatype repository
>
> Remi
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, John Childress <john.childress@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
> > <mi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven support.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > > > <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now
> > that
> > > > we get going?
> > > > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos
> > for
> > > > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex
> > project
> > > > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available
> > > from
> > > > the Apache maven repo.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer
> > that
> > > -
> > > > it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
> > > >
> > > > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at it.
> I'd
> > > > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michel Boudreau
> > >
> > > "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." - Unofficial
> motto
> > of
> > > the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > John Childress
> > 713-234-0427
> > john.childress@gmail.com
> >
>
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Remi P <rp...@gmail.com>.
+1
It's really a major point for entreprise developments that Flex SDK
artifacts can be deployed on central repo
Just for example, the last Adobe release of Flex SDK 4.6 has not yet been
deployed on sonatype repository
Remi
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, John Childress <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
> <mi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > +1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven support.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > > <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now
> that
> > > we get going?
> > > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos
> for
> > > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex
> project
> > > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available
> > from
> > > the Apache maven repo.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer
> that
> > -
> > > it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
> > >
> > > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at it. I'd
> > > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michel Boudreau
> >
> > "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." - Unofficial motto
> of
> > the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> John Childress
> 713-234-0427
> john.childress@gmail.com
>
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by John Childress <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
<mi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven support.
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now that
> > we get going?
> > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos for
> > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex project
> > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available
> from
> > the Apache maven repo.
> > >
> > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer that
> -
> > it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
> >
> > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at it. I'd
> > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Michel Boudreau
>
> "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." - Unofficial motto of
> the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
>
--
John Childress
713-234-0427
john.childress@gmail.com
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Michel Boudreau <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1 on this. Totally agree that Flex should have better maven support.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> <es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now that
> we get going?
> > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos for
> their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex project
> used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available from
> the Apache maven repo.
> >
> > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer that -
> it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
>
> As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at it. I'd
> really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
>
--
Michel Boudreau
"If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." - Unofficial motto of
the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
Re: Flex and Maven
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
<es...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now that we get going?
> JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos for their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex project used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available from the Apache maven repo.
>
> Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer that - it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos.
As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at it. I'd
really like to see us publish to Maven repos.