You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rave.apache.org by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org> on 2012/02/01 17:45:00 UTC
RE: [DISCUSS] Next 0.8-incubating release: LICENSE and NOTICE
requirements
<snip />
>>>>>>> I think I've just finished with the NOTICE (and some LICENSE)
>>>>>>> modifications
>>>>>>> needed for rave-shindig.
>>>>>>> Quite some changes which I tried to do as much as atomic as possible
>so
>>>>>>> everybody can review why I did many removals and
>additions/changes.
I have gone through every jar in rave-portal and checked licenses & NOTICE entries. I am going to call it done unless anyone finds something I didn't.
Assuming lazy consensus, we make the recent changes to the combined LICENSE & NOTICE files in the binary release this evening/tomorrow.
Re: [DISCUSS] Next 0.8-incubating release: LICENSE and NOTICE
requirements
Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
On 2/2/12 11:06 AM, "Ate Douma" <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>On 02/02/2012 04:50 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/1/12 12:24 PM, "Ate Douma"<at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/01/2012 05:45 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>> <snip />
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think I've just finished with the NOTICE (and some LICENSE)
>>>>>>>>>>> modifications
>>>>>>>>>>> needed for rave-shindig.
>>>>>>>>>>> Quite some changes which I tried to do as much as atomic as
>>>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>> everybody can review why I did many removals and
>>>>> additions/changes.
>>>>
>>>> I have gone through every jar in rave-portal and checked licenses&
>>>> NOTICE entries. I am going to call it done unless anyone finds
>>>> something I didn't.
>>>>
>>>> Assuming lazy consensus, we make the recent changes to the combined
>>>> LICENSE& NOTICE files in the binary release this evening/tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Great Matt.
>>>
>>> I've not had time to review the final result, but I can and will do so
>>> later
>>> this evening. So if you can hold off until then, I'd appreciate it :)
>>
>> Ate and I found a few more changes, but we think we have the
>>rave-shindig
>> & rave-portal L&N ironed out. I took a first pass at a merge between
>>the
>> two for the binary dist and have committed that back for review. The
>>last
>> piece of the puzzle is to add any licenses or notices that tomcat or
>>other
>> software in the dist have.
>>
>> From what I can tell, tomcat only has 1 EPL jar, the rest is all ASL.
>>I
>> will add the license& notice tomorrow.
>
>Yup, I checked it myself and it looks like the only thing extra needed
>(which
>got lost since the merge, so need to be brought back in) is a notice for:
>
> Java compilation software for JSP pages is provided by Eclipse,
> which is open source software. The original software and
> related information is available at
> http://www.eclipse.org.
>
>and indicating the EPL 1.0 license, which we already have appended to
>LICENSE,
>also applies "For the Eclipse JDT Java compiler".
These entries have been completed. I am going to call this issue complete
and will close the ticket tomorrow morning (assuming noone catches
anything before then and now). We can then go for a release candidate.
>
>Ate
>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards, Ate
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next 0.8-incubating release: LICENSE and NOTICE requirements
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 02/02/2012 04:50 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>
> On 2/1/12 12:24 PM, "Ate Douma"<at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>
>> On 02/01/2012 05:45 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>> <snip />
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think I've just finished with the NOTICE (and some LICENSE)
>>>>>>>>>> modifications
>>>>>>>>>> needed for rave-shindig.
>>>>>>>>>> Quite some changes which I tried to do as much as atomic as
>>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>> everybody can review why I did many removals and
>>>> additions/changes.
>>>
>>> I have gone through every jar in rave-portal and checked licenses&
>>> NOTICE entries. I am going to call it done unless anyone finds
>>> something I didn't.
>>>
>>> Assuming lazy consensus, we make the recent changes to the combined
>>> LICENSE& NOTICE files in the binary release this evening/tomorrow.
>>
>> Great Matt.
>>
>> I've not had time to review the final result, but I can and will do so
>> later
>> this evening. So if you can hold off until then, I'd appreciate it :)
>
> Ate and I found a few more changes, but we think we have the rave-shindig
> & rave-portal L&N ironed out. I took a first pass at a merge between the
> two for the binary dist and have committed that back for review. The last
> piece of the puzzle is to add any licenses or notices that tomcat or other
> software in the dist have.
>
> From what I can tell, tomcat only has 1 EPL jar, the rest is all ASL. I
> will add the license& notice tomorrow.
Yup, I checked it myself and it looks like the only thing extra needed (which
got lost since the merge, so need to be brought back in) is a notice for:
Java compilation software for JSP pages is provided by Eclipse,
which is open source software. The original software and
related information is available at
http://www.eclipse.org.
and indicating the EPL 1.0 license, which we already have appended to LICENSE,
also applies "For the Eclipse JDT Java compiler".
Ate
>
>>
>> Regards, Ate
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next 0.8-incubating release: LICENSE and NOTICE
requirements
Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
On 2/1/12 12:24 PM, "Ate Douma" <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>On 02/01/2012 05:45 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> <snip />
>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I've just finished with the NOTICE (and some LICENSE)
>>>>>>>>> modifications
>>>>>>>>> needed for rave-shindig.
>>>>>>>>> Quite some changes which I tried to do as much as atomic as
>>>>>>>>>possible
>>> so
>>>>>>>>> everybody can review why I did many removals and
>>> additions/changes.
>>
>> I have gone through every jar in rave-portal and checked licenses&
>>NOTICE entries. I am going to call it done unless anyone finds
>>something I didn't.
>>
>> Assuming lazy consensus, we make the recent changes to the combined
>>LICENSE& NOTICE files in the binary release this evening/tomorrow.
>
>Great Matt.
>
>I've not had time to review the final result, but I can and will do so
>later
>this evening. So if you can hold off until then, I'd appreciate it :)
Ate and I found a few more changes, but we think we have the rave-shindig
& rave-portal L&N ironed out. I took a first pass at a merge between the
two for the binary dist and have committed that back for review. The last
piece of the puzzle is to add any licenses or notices that tomcat or other
software in the dist have.
>From what I can tell, tomcat only has 1 EPL jar, the rest is all ASL. I
will add the license & notice tomorrow.
>
>Regards, Ate
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next 0.8-incubating release: LICENSE and NOTICE requirements
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 02/01/2012 05:45 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> <snip />
>
>>>>>>>> I think I've just finished with the NOTICE (and some LICENSE)
>>>>>>>> modifications
>>>>>>>> needed for rave-shindig.
>>>>>>>> Quite some changes which I tried to do as much as atomic as possible
>> so
>>>>>>>> everybody can review why I did many removals and
>> additions/changes.
>
> I have gone through every jar in rave-portal and checked licenses& NOTICE entries. I am going to call it done unless anyone finds something I didn't.
>
> Assuming lazy consensus, we make the recent changes to the combined LICENSE& NOTICE files in the binary release this evening/tomorrow.
Great Matt.
I've not had time to review the final result, but I can and will do so later
this evening. So if you can hold off until then, I'd appreciate it :)
Regards, Ate