You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org> on 2020/02/05 14:40:11 UTC
[DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Hello, Igniters.
We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions modules.
I want to release two modules:
* ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
* ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
Let's discuss it.
Any objections to it?
What should be done before release?
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Posted by Saikat Maitra <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Denis,
As discussed with Alexey I have captured the discussion details in
confluence wiki page. I have not received any concerns or follow up
questions on the release process. I can certainly pause and continue to
work on current migration of existing modules if more time required for the
review process for releases.
With respect to releases all the extensions need to be verified for an
upcoming release and updated if needed (with the version increase only for
those updated)
We can release our first version for ignite-extensions modules as 1.0.0
pointing to 2.7.6 latest released version while the master branch can
continued to be verified as per 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
Independent Integrations:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization#IEP-36:Modularization-IndependentIntegrations
Discussion Links:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization#IEP-36:Modularization-DiscussionLinks
Tickets:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization#IEP-36:Modularization-Tickets
Please let me know if you have any feedback.
Regards,
Saikat
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:16 PM Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some more thoughts.
>
> I think we can try out a first release and decide if everything is ok
> along the way. I suppose that we should run tests with supported
> Ignite versions (perhaps not all) and provide results. And finally
> there will be a release vote.
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan Pavlukhin
>
> пт, 7 февр. 2020 г. в 19:43, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Folks, have we agreed on the release process? Saikat, could you point all
> > of us to a related discussion. If my memory doesn't fail me Alex
> Goncharuk
> > also wanted to step in before we do the first release.
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:02 AM Saikat Maitra <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Nikolay, Ivan, Denis
> > >
> > > I think we can release for spring boot autoconfigure module.
> > >
> > >
> > > I will also go ahead and make release for flink ext.
> > >
> > > I have pending PR for flume and zeromq, if I can get review and
> approval I
> > > can go ahead and merge and release these modules as well.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Saikat
> > >
> > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 2:06 AM, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for clarification.
> > > >
> > > > Igniters, I will proceed with the release in the next few days if
> there
> > > is
> > > > no objections on it.
> > > >
> > > > > 7 февр. 2020 г., в 10:57, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> > > > написал(а):
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Nikolay,
> > > > >
> > > > > In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you
> mentioned
> > > > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and
> specify
> > > > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > > > > sounds fine to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > > >
> > > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org
> >:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hello, Ivan.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence
> to
> > > > Ignite versions
> > > > >>> As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an
> > > > independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite
> versions.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please, clarify, what do you mean?
> > > > >> Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and
> specify
> > > > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> > > > написал(а):
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Nikolay,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process
> in
> > > > >>> practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
> > > > >>> integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released
> without
> > > > >>> that integration bundled.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence
> to
> > > > >>> Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release
> cycle I
> > > > >>> can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of
> > > supported
> > > > >>> Ignite versions.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions
> README on
> > > > >>> GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best regards,
> > > > >>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related
> to
> > > the
> > > > >>>> extensions repository organization and release approach?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Denis
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > > nizhikov@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> We don't have a release process for newly created
> ignite-extensions
> > > > >>>>> modules.
> > > > >>>>> I want to release two modules:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > > > >>>>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Let's discuss it.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Any objections to it?
> > > > >>>>> What should be done before release?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> -
> > > > >>>> Denis
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Posted by Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>.
Some more thoughts.
I think we can try out a first release and decide if everything is ok
along the way. I suppose that we should run tests with supported
Ignite versions (perhaps not all) and provide results. And finally
there will be a release vote.
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin
пт, 7 февр. 2020 г. в 19:43, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
>
> Folks, have we agreed on the release process? Saikat, could you point all
> of us to a related discussion. If my memory doesn't fail me Alex Goncharuk
> also wanted to step in before we do the first release.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:02 AM Saikat Maitra <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Nikolay, Ivan, Denis
> >
> > I think we can release for spring boot autoconfigure module.
> >
> >
> > I will also go ahead and make release for flink ext.
> >
> > I have pending PR for flume and zeromq, if I can get review and approval I
> > can go ahead and merge and release these modules as well.
> >
> > Regards
> > Saikat
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 2:06 AM, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for clarification.
> > >
> > > Igniters, I will proceed with the release in the next few days if there
> > is
> > > no objections on it.
> > >
> > > > 7 февр. 2020 г., в 10:57, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> > > написал(а):
> > > >
> > > > Hi Nikolay,
> > > >
> > > > In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned
> > > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> > > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > > > sounds fine to me.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >
> > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello, Ivan.
> > > >>
> > > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> > > Ignite versions
> > > >>> As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an
> > > independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please, clarify, what do you mean?
> > > >> Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
> > > >>
> > > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> > > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > > >>
> > > >>> 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> > > написал(а):
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Nikolay,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
> > > >>> practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
> > > >>> integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
> > > >>> that integration bundled.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> > > >>> Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
> > > >>> can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of
> > supported
> > > >>> Ignite versions.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
> > > >>> GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best regards,
> > > >>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to
> > the
> > > >>>> extensions repository organization and release approach?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > nizhikov@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
> > > >>>>> modules.
> > > >>>>> I want to release two modules:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > > >>>>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Let's discuss it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Any objections to it?
> > > >>>>> What should be done before release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> -
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Folks, have we agreed on the release process? Saikat, could you point all
of us to a related discussion. If my memory doesn't fail me Alex Goncharuk
also wanted to step in before we do the first release.
-
Denis
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:02 AM Saikat Maitra <sa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Nikolay, Ivan, Denis
>
> I think we can release for spring boot autoconfigure module.
>
>
> I will also go ahead and make release for flink ext.
>
> I have pending PR for flume and zeromq, if I can get review and approval I
> can go ahead and merge and release these modules as well.
>
> Regards
> Saikat
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 2:06 AM, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for clarification.
> >
> > Igniters, I will proceed with the release in the next few days if there
> is
> > no objections on it.
> >
> > > 7 февр. 2020 г., в 10:57, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> > написал(а):
> > >
> > > Hi Nikolay,
> > >
> > > In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned
> > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > > sounds fine to me.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >
> > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>:
> > >>
> > >> Hello, Ivan.
> > >>
> > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> > Ignite versions
> > >>> As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an
> > independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions.
> > >>
> > >> Please, clarify, what do you mean?
> > >> Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
> > >>
> > >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> > supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > >>
> > >>> 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> > написал(а):
> > >>>
> > >>> Nikolay,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
> > >>> practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
> > >>> integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
> > >>> that integration bundled.
> > >>>
> > >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> > >>> Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
> > >>> can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of
> supported
> > >>> Ignite versions.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
> > >>> GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >>>
> > >>> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to
> the
> > >>>> extensions repository organization and release approach?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Denis
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <
> nizhikov@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
> > >>>>> modules.
> > >>>>> I want to release two modules:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > >>>>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Let's discuss it.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Any objections to it?
> > >>>>> What should be done before release?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> -
> > >>>> Denis
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Posted by Saikat Maitra <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Nikolay, Ivan, Denis
I think we can release for spring boot autoconfigure module.
I will also go ahead and make release for flink ext.
I have pending PR for flume and zeromq, if I can get review and approval I
can go ahead and merge and release these modules as well.
Regards
Saikat
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 2:06 AM, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for clarification.
>
> Igniters, I will proceed with the release in the next few days if there is
> no objections on it.
>
> > 7 февр. 2020 г., в 10:57, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> написал(а):
> >
> > Hi Nikolay,
> >
> > In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned
> >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> > sounds fine to me.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ivan Pavlukhin
> >
> > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> Hello, Ivan.
> >>
> >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> Ignite versions
> >>> As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an
> independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions.
> >>
> >> Please, clarify, what do you mean?
> >> Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
> >>
> >> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify
> supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> >>
> >>> 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>
> написал(а):
> >>>
> >>> Nikolay,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
> >>> practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
> >>> integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
> >>> that integration bundled.
> >>>
> >>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> >>> Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
> >>> can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported
> >>> Ignite versions.
> >>>
> >>> Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
> >>> GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>
> >>> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
> >>>>
> >>>> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to the
> >>>> extensions repository organization and release approach?
> >>>>
> >>>> Denis
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
> >>>>> modules.
> >>>>> I want to release two modules:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> >>>>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Let's discuss it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any objections to it?
> >>>>> What should be done before release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -
> >>>> Denis
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer
release.
Posted by Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>.
Thanks for clarification.
Igniters, I will proceed with the release in the next few days if there is no objections on it.
> 7 февр. 2020 г., в 10:57, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com> написал(а):
>
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned
>> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> sounds fine to me.
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan Pavlukhin
>
> чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Hello, Ivan.
>>
>>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to Ignite versions
>>> As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions.
>>
>> Please, clarify, what do you mean?
>> Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
>>
>> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
>>
>>> 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Nikolay,
>>>
>>> Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
>>> practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
>>> integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
>>> that integration bundled.
>>>
>>> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
>>> Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
>>> can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported
>>> Ignite versions.
>>>
>>> Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
>>> GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>
>>> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to the
>>>> extensions repository organization and release approach?
>>>>
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
>>>>> modules.
>>>>> I want to release two modules:
>>>>>
>>>>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
>>>>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's discuss it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any objections to it?
>>>>> What should be done before release?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -
>>>> Denis
>>
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Posted by Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Nikolay,
In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned
> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
sounds fine to me.
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>:
>
> Hello, Ivan.
>
> > As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to Ignite versions
> > As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions.
>
> Please, clarify, what do you mean?
> Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
>
> I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
>
> > 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com> написал(а):
> >
> > Nikolay,
> >
> > Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
> > practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
> > integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
> > that integration bundled.
> >
> > As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> > Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
> > can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported
> > Ignite versions.
> >
> > Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
> > GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ivan Pavlukhin
> >
> > ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to the
> >> extensions repository organization and release approach?
> >>
> >> Denis
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>
> >>> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
> >>> modules.
> >>> I want to release two modules:
> >>>
> >>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> >>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> >>>
> >>> Let's discuss it.
> >>>
> >>> Any objections to it?
> >>> What should be done before release?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -
> >> Denis
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer
release.
Posted by Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org>.
Hello, Ivan.
> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to Ignite versions
> As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions.
Please, clarify, what do you mean?
Do you have any idea how it should be implemented?
I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify supported Ignite version somewhere in the documentation.
> 6 февр. 2020 г., в 11:15, Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com> написал(а):
>
> Nikolay,
>
> Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
> practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
> integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
> that integration bundled.
>
> As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
> Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
> can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported
> Ignite versions.
>
> Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
> GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan Pavlukhin
>
> ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to the
>> extensions repository organization and release approach?
>>
>> Denis
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>
>>> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
>>> modules.
>>> I want to release two modules:
>>>
>>> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
>>> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
>>>
>>> Let's discuss it.
>>>
>>> Any objections to it?
>>> What should be done before release?
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -
>> Denis
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Posted by Ivan Pavlukhin <vo...@gmail.com>.
Nikolay,
Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in
practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink
integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without
that integration bundled.
As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to
Ignite versions. As we are going to have a separate release cycle I
can imagine an independent versioning scheme with a range of supported
Ignite versions.
Also I think it is a good idea to update ignite-extensions README on
GitHub and provide a link to relevant TC jobs.
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin
ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>:
>
> Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to the
> extensions repository organization and release approach?
>
> Denis
>
> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello, Igniters.
> >
> > We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
> > modules.
> > I want to release two modules:
> >
> > * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> > * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> >
> > Let's discuss it.
> >
> > Any objections to it?
> > What should be done before release?
> >
>
>
> --
> -
> Denis
Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to the
extensions repository organization and release approach?
Denis
On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions
> modules.
> I want to release two modules:
>
> * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure
> * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure
>
> Let's discuss it.
>
> Any objections to it?
> What should be done before release?
>
--
-
Denis