You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@perl.apache.org by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> on 2000/06/28 20:31:40 UTC
Re: dev@perl.apache.org
Testing whether we are all subscribed. If you have received two copies
of my email everything is fine, if not, there can be the same problem we
have experienced with the first days of the pmc@ list...
Or was I wrong considering that we are automatically subscribed :)
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Eric Cholet wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> >
> > +1
>
> "me too". But I guess you figured since I created the list now. :-)
>
>
> - ask
>
> --
> ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
> more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: pmc-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: pmc-help@perl.apache.org
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:stas@stason.org http://perl.org http://stason.org/TULARC
http://singlesheaven.com http://perlmonth.com http://sourcegarden.org
Re: dev@perl.apache.org
Posted by Ask Bjoern Hansen <as...@valueclick.com>.
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Testing whether we are all subscribed. If you have received two copies
> of my email everything is fine, if not, there can be the same problem we
> have experienced with the first days of the pmc@ list...
>
> Or was I wrong considering that we are automatically subscribed :)
kinda. "we" are only subscribed because we probably were subscribed to
modperl-cvs@apache.org too before. :)
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>