You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com> on 2017/09/09 10:50:04 UTC
Please retweet and vote
https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
--
Sent from my phone
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>.
Stephen,
I was pragmatic and did not want to push users to use Maven&Java8 only
because JDK 7 is weak.
First the interest should go from inside, this means API and then users.
I agree with Michael whether we should better focus on Maven 4 and POM
structure.
For instance today everybody could notice on mailing list that we are in
hurry with Jigsaw support, me too! It does not mean for me Java 9, nothing
but Jigsaw's modularity because this goes with Users - my second question
(first was API). So yes this makes sense to spend the time in Jigsaw
however I am the one who does not like Oracle's style of pushing the
release and breaking their rules that Java SE release is aligned with Java
EE release where Java EE 8 is not yet out. And I am not talking about the
facts that Oracle's Patent of SE will be cheaper but developers more angry
in 9 and 10 because I know what they plan to do!
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Am 2017-09-10 um 19:07 schrieb Stephen Connolly:
>
>> Hervé and I discussed on irc earlier today.
>>
>> My suggestion - I was going to write up tomorrow - is that we drop 7 for
>> 3.6.x
>>
>> We should focus 3.6.x on making the codebase Java 8 (lambdas, replace
>> File____Stream with the non-file handle leak version, adopt Path, etc)
>> with
>> a view to encourage contributions... and best support for Java 9 (such
>> that
>> if you run j9 we recommend 3.6.x)
>>
>
> This will take months to properly rewrite Maven core. I'd rather see this
> for Maven 4 and continue to polish Maven with 3.5.x, 3.6.x, etc.
>
> Unless no one will do this within a short timeframe, I see no benefit here.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org>.
Am 2017-09-10 um 19:07 schrieb Stephen Connolly:
> Hervé and I discussed on irc earlier today.
>
> My suggestion - I was going to write up tomorrow - is that we drop 7 for
> 3.6.x
>
> We should focus 3.6.x on making the codebase Java 8 (lambdas, replace
> File____Stream with the non-file handle leak version, adopt Path, etc) with
> a view to encourage contributions... and best support for Java 9 (such that
> if you run j9 we recommend 3.6.x)
This will take months to properly rewrite Maven core. I'd rather see
this for Maven 4 and continue to polish Maven with 3.5.x, 3.6.x, etc.
Unless no one will do this within a short timeframe, I see no benefit here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
Hervé and I discussed on irc earlier today.
My suggestion - I was going to write up tomorrow - is that we drop 7 for
3.6.x
We should focus 3.6.x on making the codebase Java 8 (lambdas, replace
File____Stream with the non-file handle leak version, adopt Path, etc) with
a view to encourage contributions... and best support for Java 9 (such that
if you run j9 we recommend 3.6.x)
We can keep 3.5.x alive for security issues and S1/S2 backports for the
next 6 months or so. Close all other lines.
75% of people were fine with requiring Java 8
Also remember that Java 7 ships with out of date TLS root CA certs and iirc
does not support SNI, so the reality is you shouldn't be running Maven with
Java 7 unless you are within a secure intranet with a corp proxy that can
perform the TLS verification for you.
(Now openjdk 7 is a different story, but if we say some subset of 7 then
people will assume oracle 7 also)
On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 17:52, Arnaud Héritier <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But on twitter thus probably far from being a good representation of our
> users ...
>
> Le dim. 10 sept. 2017 à 18:45, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > On Sep 10, 2017 10:33, "Robert Scholte" <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > So what would be the conclusion?
> >
> > 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period?
> >
> > IMHO that's a lot
> >
> >
> > but less than the 65% who do not, an overwhelming majority.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > Robert
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
> > stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So poll results:
> > >
> > > 493 votes cast
> > >
> > > 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> > > 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> > > 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
> > >
> > > On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
> > > stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
> > >> --
> > >> Sent from my phone
> > >>
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> --
> -----
> Arnaud Héritier
> http://aheritier.net
> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>
--
Sent from my phone
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Arnaud Héritier <ah...@gmail.com>.
But on twitter thus probably far from being a good representation of our
users ...
Le dim. 10 sept. 2017 à 18:45, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> On Sep 10, 2017 10:33, "Robert Scholte" <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> So what would be the conclusion?
>
> 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period?
>
> IMHO that's a lot
>
>
> but less than the 65% who do not, an overwhelming majority.
>
> Gary
>
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So poll results:
> >
> > 493 votes cast
> >
> > 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> > 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> > 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
> >
> > On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
> > stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
> >> --
> >> Sent from my phone
> >>
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
--
-----
Arnaud Héritier
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
Twitter/Skype : aheritier
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 10, 2017 10:33, "Robert Scholte" <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
So what would be the conclusion?
35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period?
IMHO that's a lot
but less than the 65% who do not, an overwhelming majority.
Gary
Robert
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
So poll results:
>
> 493 votes cast
>
> 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
>
> On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
>> --
>> Sent from my phone
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>.
Robert,
>>And if we're focusing on the latter, shouldn't the twitter question be
Good remark! I am not against such question on Twitter but I would be
interested in one more in comparison to Gradle.
*What the Maven should improve to make Maven more attractive against
Gradle?*
Because I don't think that question about using Java 8 in Maven beats more
that the question with Gradle.
I know the PMC's answer to Gradle and I am totally with you! I don't use
Gradle and never will but the users always like to try some new.
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:21:11 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 19:04, Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java 8?
>>>
>>> When I first saw these options I asked myself what benefit would have the
>>> User and Jenkins from Java 8.
>>> And second question was whether we would be so flexible to rewrite the
>>> code
>>> and use Lambda fully anywhere in the code.
>>>
>>
>>
>> There is the social aspect. If you are a potential new contributor to
>> Maven
>> and you look at our heavy Java 1.3 convention codebase (ok, I'm being a
>> demagogue, it's had a bit updated to 5.0) are you going to be encouraged
>> to
>> step forward?
>>
>> How can you make small improvements and demonstrate you are a safe pair of
>> hands to gain the commit bit?
>>
>> Now if we have the opertunity to make lots of tidy up and you can show you
>> are a safe pair of hands, retaining binary compatibility with older
>> plugins, making the code more readable, finding file handle leaks, etc...
>> well now you have a welcome path to demonstrate your skills.... while
>> gaining familiarity with the codebase so that when we turn around to start
>> on Maven 5.0.x you can join in the fun.
>>
>> Now that is not a technical argument, but we are a community first... so
>> maybe the technical arguments are not so right to push!
>>
>>
> bq. but we are a community first
>
> What's the definition of community: the large user group or the few we're
> hoping to find who can help working on Maven?
> And if we're focusing on the latter, shouldn't the twitter question be:
>
> I want to become a Maven developer
> [] right now!
> [] only if Maven requires Java 8 ( so I can use lambda's, etc.)
> [] never, let others do the job
> [] other...
>
>
>
>>> So I kept Java 7 for Maven 3.6 which does not mean that Maven 4 or 5
>>> would
>>> not change this.
>>> Regarding security everybody can use JDK 8 with old Maven but different
>>> story would be enhancements in Networking API.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, but shouldn't we stop them using the known bad Java 7 if they want
>> the
>> latest maven? If they don't care about security, then they'll likely not
>> upgrade Maven either... so why worry about keeping Java 7 for them... when
>> they do get around to upgrading they'll do it all in bulk anyway... so
>> asking them to go Java 8 at that time will not be an issue... plus we do
>> them a favour by being another reason to upgrade ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > So what would be the conclusion?
>>> >
>>> > 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period?
>>> >
>>> > IMHO that's a lot
>>> >
>>> > Robert
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
>>> > stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > So poll results:
>>> >>
>>> >> 493 votes cast
>>> >>
>>> >> 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
>>> >> 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
>>> >> 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
>>> >> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Sent from my phone
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Baptiste Mathus <ml...@batmat.net>.
Hello,
Only lurking those days, but chiming in quickly here :-).
2017-09-10 20:54 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:21:11 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 19:04, Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java 8?
>>>
>>> When I first saw these options I asked myself what benefit would have the
>>> User and Jenkins from Java 8.
>>> And second question was whether we would be so flexible to rewrite the
>>> code
>>> and use Lambda fully anywhere in the code.
>>>
>>
>>
>> There is the social aspect. If you are a potential new contributor to
>> Maven
>> and you look at our heavy Java 1.3 convention codebase (ok, I'm being a
>> demagogue, it's had a bit updated to 5.0) are you going to be encouraged
>> to
>> step forward?
>>
>> How can you make small improvements and demonstrate you are a safe pair of
>> hands to gain the commit bit?
>>
>> Now if we have the opertunity to make lots of tidy up and you can show you
>> are a safe pair of hands, retaining binary compatibility with older
>> plugins, making the code more readable, finding file handle leaks, etc...
>> well now you have a welcome path to demonstrate your skills.... while
>> gaining familiarity with the codebase so that when we turn around to start
>> on Maven 5.0.x you can join in the fun.
>>
>> Now that is not a technical argument, but we are a community first... so
>> maybe the technical arguments are not so right to push!
>>
>>
> bq. but we are a community first
>
> What's the definition of community: the large user group or the few we're
> hoping to find who can help working on Maven?
> And if we're focusing on the latter, shouldn't the twitter question be:
>
> I want to become a Maven developer
> [] right now!
> [] only if Maven requires Java 8 ( so I can use lambda's, etc.)
>
This is definitely one the things we put forward for moving Jenkins to Java
8 recently [1], keeping contribution appealing.
Because, well, that's great the Maven community would try to help large
companies not be bothered by any kind of upgrade, like Free Enterprise
software support :-).
But I think this is a dead-end, those kind of teams/companies won't upgrade
*anyway*.
Looking at the stats, I would think there's actually not much debate:
people not wanting to upgrade, well, won't upgrade... And proportion is not
that high.
What is the actual issue anyway? They will keep using 3.5.x for 3 years? So
what, I bet they already do. No, wait, they're not, they're using 2.2.1.
I just checked, the company I left 1 year ago is still running 3.2.1, and I
don't expect them to upgrade anytime soon...
Maven backward compatibility is great, so IMO don't bother spending time
with JDK7.
The Maven dev team should IMO concentrate of making Maven great, not
supporting a big variety of versions/flavours developers will hate the
codebase each time they remember "urgh, I can't use this!".
The less combinatorials, the better for anyone working on her/his free time
:-\.
My 2 cents
-- Baptiste
[1] https://jenkins.io/blog/2017/01/17/Jenkins-is-upgrading-to-Java-8/
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>.
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:21:11 +0200, Stephen Connolly
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 19:04, Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java
>> 8?
>>
>> When I first saw these options I asked myself what benefit would have
>> the
>> User and Jenkins from Java 8.
>> And second question was whether we would be so flexible to rewrite the
>> code
>> and use Lambda fully anywhere in the code.
>
>
> There is the social aspect. If you are a potential new contributor to
> Maven
> and you look at our heavy Java 1.3 convention codebase (ok, I'm being a
> demagogue, it's had a bit updated to 5.0) are you going to be encouraged
> to
> step forward?
>
> How can you make small improvements and demonstrate you are a safe pair
> of
> hands to gain the commit bit?
>
> Now if we have the opertunity to make lots of tidy up and you can show
> you
> are a safe pair of hands, retaining binary compatibility with older
> plugins, making the code more readable, finding file handle leaks, etc...
> well now you have a welcome path to demonstrate your skills.... while
> gaining familiarity with the codebase so that when we turn around to
> start
> on Maven 5.0.x you can join in the fun.
>
> Now that is not a technical argument, but we are a community first... so
> maybe the technical arguments are not so right to push!
>
bq. but we are a community first
What's the definition of community: the large user group or the few we're
hoping to find who can help working on Maven?
And if we're focusing on the latter, shouldn't the twitter question be:
I want to become a Maven developer
[] right now!
[] only if Maven requires Java 8 ( so I can use lambda's, etc.)
[] never, let others do the job
[] other...
>>
>> So I kept Java 7 for Maven 3.6 which does not mean that Maven 4 or 5
>> would
>> not change this.
>> Regarding security everybody can use JDK 8 with old Maven but different
>> story would be enhancements in Networking API.
>
>
> Yes, but shouldn't we stop them using the known bad Java 7 if they want
> the
> latest maven? If they don't care about security, then they'll likely not
> upgrade Maven either... so why worry about keeping Java 7 for them...
> when
> they do get around to upgrading they'll do it all in bulk anyway... so
> asking them to go Java 8 at that time will not be an issue... plus we do
> them a favour by being another reason to upgrade ;-)
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So what would be the conclusion?
>> >
>> > 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer
>> period?
>> >
>> > IMHO that's a lot
>> >
>> > Robert
>> >
>> > On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
>> > stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > So poll results:
>> >>
>> >> 493 votes cast
>> >>
>> >> 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
>> >> 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
>> >> 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to
>> 3.5.x
>> >>
>> >> On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
>> >> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
>> >>> --
>> >>> Sent from my phone
>> >>>
>> >>
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>> >
>> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 19:04, Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java 8?
>
> When I first saw these options I asked myself what benefit would have the
> User and Jenkins from Java 8.
> And second question was whether we would be so flexible to rewrite the code
> and use Lambda fully anywhere in the code.
There is the social aspect. If you are a potential new contributor to Maven
and you look at our heavy Java 1.3 convention codebase (ok, I'm being a
demagogue, it's had a bit updated to 5.0) are you going to be encouraged to
step forward?
How can you make small improvements and demonstrate you are a safe pair of
hands to gain the commit bit?
Now if we have the opertunity to make lots of tidy up and you can show you
are a safe pair of hands, retaining binary compatibility with older
plugins, making the code more readable, finding file handle leaks, etc...
well now you have a welcome path to demonstrate your skills.... while
gaining familiarity with the codebase so that when we turn around to start
on Maven 5.0.x you can join in the fun.
Now that is not a technical argument, but we are a community first... so
maybe the technical arguments are not so right to push!
>
> So I kept Java 7 for Maven 3.6 which does not mean that Maven 4 or 5 would
> not change this.
> Regarding security everybody can use JDK 8 with old Maven but different
> story would be enhancements in Networking API.
Yes, but shouldn't we stop them using the known bad Java 7 if they want the
latest maven? If they don't care about security, then they'll likely not
upgrade Maven either... so why worry about keeping Java 7 for them... when
they do get around to upgrading they'll do it all in bulk anyway... so
asking them to go Java 8 at that time will not be an issue... plus we do
them a favour by being another reason to upgrade ;-)
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > So what would be the conclusion?
> >
> > 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period?
> >
> > IMHO that's a lot
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
> > stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So poll results:
> >>
> >> 493 votes cast
> >>
> >> 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> >> 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> >> 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
> >>
> >> On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
> >> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from my phone
> >>>
> >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
Sent from my phone
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>.
Hi All,
Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java 8?
When I first saw these options I asked myself what benefit would have the
User and Jenkins from Java 8.
And second question was whether we would be so flexible to rewrite the code
and use Lambda fully anywhere in the code.
So I kept Java 7 for Maven 3.6 which does not mean that Maven 4 or 5 would
not change this.
Regarding security everybody can use JDK 8 with old Maven but different
story would be enhancements in Networking API.
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>
wrote:
> So what would be the conclusion?
>
> 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period?
>
> IMHO that's a lot
>
> Robert
>
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So poll results:
>>
>> 493 votes cast
>>
>> 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
>> 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
>> 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
>>
>> On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
>> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
>>> --
>>> Sent from my phone
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>.
So what would be the conclusion?
35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period?
IMHO that's a lot
Robert
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So poll results:
>
> 493 votes cast
>
> 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
> 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
>
> On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
>> --
>> Sent from my phone
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
[RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
So poll results:
493 votes cast
25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
> --
> Sent from my phone
>
--
Sent from my phone
[RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
So poll results:
493 votes cast
25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x
10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x
On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://twitter.com/asfmavenproject/status/906451059966693376
> --
> Sent from my phone
>
--
Sent from my phone