You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by Geoff Longman <gl...@intelligentworks.com> on 2003/03/06 17:19:58 UTC
Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
Noticed that in CVS the property org.apache.tapestry.application-specification, declared in ApplicationServlet, is no longer referenced anwhere in the code.
Am I correct to assume that this is not an oversight and that using this property as a mechanism for locating an app spec is out?
Geoff
Geoffrey Longman
Intelligent Works Inc.
RE: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
Posted by "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <hl...@attbi.com>.
I'll change the code to use APP_SPEC_PATH_PARAM instead of a literal.
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Longman [mailto:glongman@intelligentworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:06 PM
> To: Tapestry development
> Subject: Re: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
>
>
> figured it out:
>
> in ApplicationServlet:
>
> private static final String APP_SPEC_PATH_PARAM =
> "org.apache.tapestry.application-specification"
>
> is not referenced, but the string itself is used in
> getApplicationSpecificationPath()
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <hl...@attbi.com>
> To: "'Tapestry development'" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:59 AM
> Subject: RE: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
>
>
> > I'll check into it. We should still be supporting app specs in the
> > classpath, which is what this property is for. I'm pretty
> sure I have
> unit
> > tests that make use of this ...
> >
> > --
> > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Geoff Longman [mailto:glongman@intelligentworks.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM
> > > To: tapestry-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> > > Subject: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
> > >
> > >
> > > Noticed that in CVS the property
> > > org.apache.tapestry.application-specification, declared in
> > > ApplicationServlet, is no longer referenced anwhere in the code.
> > >
> > > Am I correct to assume that this is not an oversight and
> that using
> > > this property as a mechanism for locating an app spec is out?
> > >
> > > Geoff
> > >
> > > Geoffrey Longman
> > > Intelligent Works Inc.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> tapestry-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
Posted by Geoff Longman <gl...@intelligentworks.com>.
figured it out:
in ApplicationServlet:
private static final String APP_SPEC_PATH_PARAM =
"org.apache.tapestry.application-specification"
is not referenced, but the string itself is used in
getApplicationSpecificationPath()
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <hl...@attbi.com>
To: "'Tapestry development'" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
> I'll check into it. We should still be supporting app specs in the
> classpath, which is what this property is for. I'm pretty sure I have
unit
> tests that make use of this ...
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Geoff Longman [mailto:glongman@intelligentworks.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM
> > To: tapestry-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
> >
> >
> > Noticed that in CVS the property
> > org.apache.tapestry.application-specification, declared in
> > ApplicationServlet, is no longer referenced anwhere in the code.
> >
> > Am I correct to assume that this is not an oversight and that
> > using this property as a mechanism for locating an app spec is out?
> >
> > Geoff
> >
> > Geoffrey Longman
> > Intelligent Works Inc.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
RE: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
Posted by "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <hl...@attbi.com>.
I'll check into it. We should still be supporting app specs in the
classpath, which is what this property is for. I'm pretty sure I have unit
tests that make use of this ...
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Longman [mailto:glongman@intelligentworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM
> To: tapestry-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Need confirmation about Tapestry 2.4
>
>
> Noticed that in CVS the property
> org.apache.tapestry.application-specification, declared in
> ApplicationServlet, is no longer referenced anwhere in the code.
>
> Am I correct to assume that this is not an oversight and that
> using this property as a mechanism for locating an app spec is out?
>
> Geoff
>
> Geoffrey Longman
> Intelligent Works Inc.
>
>
>