You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Andrei Pozolotin <an...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/12 18:48:07 UTC
features -> subsystems?
Jean-Baptiste
Can you please clarify what are karaf plans
as it relates to features vs subsystems?
http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html
* will features be replaced by subsystems?
* will features continue as independent?
* will they co-exist
* etc.
Thank you,
Andrei
Re: features -> subsystems?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi David,
Agree, it's not the same purpose/scope.
Regards
JB
On 04/12/2013 07:00 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> The scope of karat features is also much much smaller than subsystems since karat features don't provide isolation.
>
> david jencks
>
> On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> the first plan is to coexist.
>>
>> It's the same plan for P2 repositories.
>>
>> Features is the central and main provisioning for Karaf: we don't plan to move to something else for now.
>> However, provide "bridges" between others systems (like subsystems and P2) is interesting (both in the runtime and in the karaf-maven-plugin).
>>
>> The scope coverage of the Karaf features is "larger" (at least for now) than subsystem. For instance, the ConfigAdmin/ConfigFile support is very limited in subsystems comparing to Karaf Features.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 04/12/2013 06:48 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>>> Jean-Baptiste
>>>
>>> Can you please clarify what are karaf plans
>>> as it relates to features vs subsystems?
>>> http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html
>>> * will features be replaced by subsystems?
>>> * will features continue as independent?
>>> * will they co-exist
>>> * etc.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: features -> subsystems?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
The scope of karat features is also much much smaller than subsystems since karat features don't provide isolation.
david jencks
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> the first plan is to coexist.
>
> It's the same plan for P2 repositories.
>
> Features is the central and main provisioning for Karaf: we don't plan to move to something else for now.
> However, provide "bridges" between others systems (like subsystems and P2) is interesting (both in the runtime and in the karaf-maven-plugin).
>
> The scope coverage of the Karaf features is "larger" (at least for now) than subsystem. For instance, the ConfigAdmin/ConfigFile support is very limited in subsystems comparing to Karaf Features.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 04/12/2013 06:48 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>> Jean-Baptiste
>>
>> Can you please clarify what are karaf plans
>> as it relates to features vs subsystems?
>> http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html
>> * will features be replaced by subsystems?
>> * will features continue as independent?
>> * will they co-exist
>> * etc.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: features -> subsystems?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Andrei,
the first plan is to coexist.
It's the same plan for P2 repositories.
Features is the central and main provisioning for Karaf: we don't plan
to move to something else for now.
However, provide "bridges" between others systems (like subsystems and
P2) is interesting (both in the runtime and in the karaf-maven-plugin).
The scope coverage of the Karaf features is "larger" (at least for now)
than subsystem. For instance, the ConfigAdmin/ConfigFile support is very
limited in subsystems comparing to Karaf Features.
Regards
JB
On 04/12/2013 06:48 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste
>
> Can you please clarify what are karaf plans
> as it relates to features vs subsystems?
> http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html
> * will features be replaced by subsystems?
> * will features continue as independent?
> * will they co-exist
> * etc.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com