You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> on 2009/03/04 19:41:33 UTC
Re: OpenEJB 3.0.1
David,
The latest 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT looks good to us (Geronimo) on all levels.
Can we get a release of this soon?
Thanks for all your help!
Joe
David Blevins wrote:
> As an FYI for those that don't track Geronimo development. Geronimo is
> releasing a 2.1.4 and needs a fix from the OpenEJB 3.0.x stream. Going
> to create a branch from our 3.0 tag, update it to 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT and
> start applying the required fixes.
>
> -David
>
>
Re: OpenEJB 3.0.1
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I had exactly the same error when I tried to release the tranql oracle
wrapper at codehaus a few days ago. After trying a lot of things
unsuccessfully I ended up
1. running release:prepare (it updates svn with the new version and
tries to copy the working copy into the svn tag, which fails)
2. manually copying the svn trunk/branch to tags (the maven output
includes the svn command that fails, basically svn cp . https/foo/tags/
tag-name, I changed it to svn cp https://foo/trunk https/foo/tags/tag-
name)
3. updating the local properties file that indicates how far the
release plugin got to claim it successfully did the copy
4. running mvn release:prepare again (now it succeeds since it thinks
_it_ did the copy)
5. running mvn release:perform.
I'm not sure its a maven problem because running the svn command maven
tries also fails from the command line. So I wonder if its an svn
bug????
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:15 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Running into issues here. Hopefully one of the maven guys can help
> tomorrow.
>
> The release:prepare phase keeps failing with:
> [INFO] Unable to tag SCM
> Provider message:
> The svn tag command failed.
> Command output:
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: File '/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.1/assembly/openejb-
> itests-standalone-client/pom.xml' already exists
>
> I tried to tag manually from that same checkout and got the same
> error. I had to grab a new checkout and then I was finally able to
> tag. Didn't seem to matter as the release:perform refuses to do
> anything since I went off-book.
>
> -David
>
> On Mar 6, 2009, at 4:20 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> FYI, got the poms updated for the nexus stuff. Still running into
>> some issues. Working with Brain Fox to get them resolved.
>> Hopefully I'll have some jars up in the staging repo for a vote soon.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> The latest 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT looks good to us (Geronimo) on all
>>> levels. Can we get a release of this soon?
>>>
>>> Thanks for all your help!
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>> As an FYI for those that don't track Geronimo development.
>>>> Geronimo is releasing a 2.1.4 and needs a fix from the OpenEJB
>>>> 3.0.x stream. Going to create a branch from our 3.0 tag, update
>>>> it to 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT and start applying the required fixes.
>>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: OpenEJB 3.0.1
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Running into issues here. Hopefully one of the maven guys can help
tomorrow.
The release:prepare phase keeps failing with:
[INFO] Unable to tag SCM
Provider message:
The svn tag command failed.
Command output:
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: File '/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.1/assembly/openejb-
itests-standalone-client/pom.xml' already exists
I tried to tag manually from that same checkout and got the same
error. I had to grab a new checkout and then I was finally able to
tag. Didn't seem to matter as the release:perform refuses to do
anything since I went off-book.
-David
On Mar 6, 2009, at 4:20 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> FYI, got the poms updated for the nexus stuff. Still running into
> some issues. Working with Brain Fox to get them resolved.
> Hopefully I'll have some jars up in the staging repo for a vote soon.
>
> -David
>
> On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> The latest 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT looks good to us (Geronimo) on all
>> levels. Can we get a release of this soon?
>>
>> Thanks for all your help!
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> David Blevins wrote:
>>> As an FYI for those that don't track Geronimo development.
>>> Geronimo is releasing a 2.1.4 and needs a fix from the OpenEJB
>>> 3.0.x stream. Going to create a branch from our 3.0 tag, update
>>> it to 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT and start applying the required fixes.
>>> -David
>>
>>
>
>
Re: OpenEJB 3.0.1
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
FYI, got the poms updated for the nexus stuff. Still running into
some issues. Working with Brain Fox to get them resolved. Hopefully
I'll have some jars up in the staging repo for a vote soon.
-David
On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> David,
>
> The latest 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT looks good to us (Geronimo) on all levels.
> Can we get a release of this soon?
>
> Thanks for all your help!
> Joe
>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
>> As an FYI for those that don't track Geronimo development.
>> Geronimo is releasing a 2.1.4 and needs a fix from the OpenEJB
>> 3.0.x stream. Going to create a branch from our 3.0 tag, update it
>> to 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT and start applying the required fixes.
>> -David
>
>