You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch> on 2008/04/14 20:53:25 UTC
Re: Merge Temp_ProcessingFeedback branch into Trunk
You need to run the build at least to target "resourcegen", i.e. "ant
resourcegen". That generated the event-model.xml.
On 14.04.2008 17:09:49 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> I couldn't find event-model.xml anywhere.. have I missed something?
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> at org.apache.fop.apps.FOUserAgent.<init>(FOUserAgent.java:98)
> at org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.newFOUserAgent(FopFactory.java:177)
> at org.apache.fop.cli.CommandLineOptions.parse(CommandLineOptions.java:151)
> at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.startFOP(Main.java:154)
> at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.main(Main.java:197)
> Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: File event-model.xml not found
> at org.apache.fop.events.model.AbstractEventModelFactory.loadModel(AbstractEventModelFactory.java:46)
> at org.apache.fop.events.FOPEventModelFactory.createEventModel(FOPEventModelFactory.java:34)
> at org.apache.fop.events.DefaultEventBroadcaster.<clinit>(DefaultEventBroadcaster.java:73)
> ... 5 more
>
> Adrian.
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Vote passes: 8 +1s, no other votes.
> >
> > I'm going to do one last change before the merge: Vincent told me last
> > week that the "Factory" classes in the event producers should rather be
> > something like "getters" (or "providers") since the returned instances
> > may be cached and reused. A factory usually creates a new instance in
> > every case. I think he's right so quickly go over all the event
> > producers and change from "Factory.create()" to "Provider.get()" using
> > naming much like we already have in layoutmgr.PageProvider. I hope
> > that's ok.
> >
> > On 05.04.2008 16:33:51 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >> As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
> >> processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
> >> per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
> >>
> >> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_ProcessingFeedback
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 from me.
> >>
> >> Jeremias Maerki
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jeremias Maerki
> >
> >
Jeremias Maerki
Re: Merge Temp_ProcessingFeedback branch into Trunk
Posted by Adrian Cumiskey <ad...@gmail.com>.
Thanks that now works fine for me :).
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> You need to run the build at least to target "resourcegen", i.e. "ant
> resourcegen". That generated the event-model.xml.
>
> On 14.04.2008 17:09:49 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
>> Hi Jeremias,
>>
>> I couldn't find event-model.xml anywhere.. have I missed something?
>>
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
>> at org.apache.fop.apps.FOUserAgent.<init>(FOUserAgent.java:98)
>> at org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.newFOUserAgent(FopFactory.java:177)
>> at org.apache.fop.cli.CommandLineOptions.parse(CommandLineOptions.java:151)
>> at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.startFOP(Main.java:154)
>> at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.main(Main.java:197)
>> Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: File event-model.xml not found
>> at org.apache.fop.events.model.AbstractEventModelFactory.loadModel(AbstractEventModelFactory.java:46)
>> at org.apache.fop.events.FOPEventModelFactory.createEventModel(FOPEventModelFactory.java:34)
>> at org.apache.fop.events.DefaultEventBroadcaster.<clinit>(DefaultEventBroadcaster.java:73)
>> ... 5 more
>>
>> Adrian.
>>
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> Vote passes: 8 +1s, no other votes.
>>>
>>> I'm going to do one last change before the merge: Vincent told me last
>>> week that the "Factory" classes in the event producers should rather be
>>> something like "getters" (or "providers") since the returned instances
>>> may be cached and reused. A factory usually creates a new instance in
>>> every case. I think he's right so quickly go over all the event
>>> producers and change from "Factory.create()" to "Provider.get()" using
>>> naming much like we already have in layoutmgr.PageProvider. I hope
>>> that's ok.
>>>
>>> On 05.04.2008 16:33:51 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>>> As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
>>>> processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
>>>> per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_ProcessingFeedback
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>
>>>> Jeremias Maerki
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jeremias Maerki
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>