You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/27 11:57:47 UTC

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-1949) FilterManager uses unsafe keys for its filter cache

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Shai Erera closed LUCENE-1949.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

FilterManager is used only by 'remote' classes, which are deprecated in 3x and removed from trunk. I'm think FilterManager can be deprecated as well. We have CachingWrapperFilter which caches Filters and is much better.

> FilterManager uses unsafe keys for its filter cache
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1949
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1949
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Aaron McKee
>            Priority: Minor
>
> re: FilterManager.getFilter(Filter filter)
> FilterManager is using the filter's hash code as the key to its filter cache, however hash codes are intrinsically not guaranteed to be distinct; different filters may hash to the same value. Although the chance of a conflict is hopefully low, given reasonable implementations of hashCode, it's certainly not impossible. When a conflict does occur, an unintended filter may be returned.
> I'm unaware to what extent this class is actively being used, but noticed the issue during a code browse and thought I'd at least mention it. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org