You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hc.apache.org by Mike Bowler <mb...@GargoyleSoftware.com> on 2003/01/28 21:49:41 UTC
Bug 16429: Align the code base with checkstyle
Another patch for the style changes is attached to the bug report
("round3").
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16429
There were a couple of spots where checkstyle was warning about public
static variables. I've created new variables that conform to our
standards and deprecated the old ones.
I didn't want to remove the old ones at this point because they are
public and removing them could break code that uses httpclient. Do we
have a schedule for removing deprecated things?
There are also some protected instance variables that I've left alone
for the same reasons. I didn't deprecate these as I haven't provided
replacements.
--
Mike Bowler
Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc.
Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email : mbowler@GargoyleSoftware.com
Fax : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com
Re: Bug 16429: Align the code base with checkstyle
Posted by Jeffrey Dever <js...@sympatico.ca>.
Ha, ha. When I committed round 4 the commit message was rejected
because it was longer than 100kB. Thats a BIG patch.
Mike Bowler wrote:
> Another patch for the style changes is attached to the bug report
> ("round3").
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16429
>
> There were a couple of spots where checkstyle was warning about public
> static variables. I've created new variables that conform to our
> standards and deprecated the old ones.
>
> I didn't want to remove the old ones at this point because they are
> public and removing them could break code that uses httpclient. Do we
> have a schedule for removing deprecated things?
>
> There are also some protected instance variables that I've left alone
> for the same reasons. I didn't deprecate these as I haven't provided
> replacements.
>