Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>]

Hi guys,

Just a quick update about these releases.

Basically, I have two actions to complete before the releases:

1. Performance improvements for PostgreSQL JDBC adapter.
2. STOMP log messages cleanup/improvements

I’m fully committed and focused on these release, I will submit both to vote asap.

Sorry for the delay, but PostgreSQL JDBC adapter performance improvements are very important (reported by several users).

I keep you posted soon.

Regards
JB

> Le 28 janv. 2020 à 13:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I would like to move forward on ActiveMQ releases:
> 
> - ActiveMQ 5.15.12
> I'm preparing several dependency updates and important fixes on the
> activemq-5.15.x branch. It includes some security fixes, postgresql jdbc
> store performance improvements, ...
> I have some PRs under review and on the fly, so, I plan to submit
> 5.15.12 to vote next week.
> 
> - ActiveMQ 5.16.0
> I did a full pass (standalone and in Apache Karaf) with JDK 11. The
> broker works without problem, including on Karaf 4.2.8.
> However, it's not currently possible to fully build with JDK 11. I have
> a branch where I did the required changes (remove the use of tools.jar
> in openwire generator, add annotation and jaxb dependency in different
> modules, update scala for leveldb, ...).
> The question that I have is about what's the exact target for 5.16.0:
> 1. We still build ActiveMQ 5.16.x with JDK8, but it supports both JDK8
> or JDK11 at runtime.
> 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only
> support JDK11 at runtime.
> Thoughts ?
> Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me
> know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com