tr:treeTable vs. tr:table

[Laurie Harper <la...@holoweb.net>]

Am I right in thinking that there is no way to get a treeTable to  
display multiple undisclosed rows at the root level? Since TreeModel  
extends CollectionModel, it seems intuitively logical to assume that  
this would work, but I can't seem to get it to.

What I need to do is display a table of data, where each row can have  
children. The data is hierarchical, so using a tr:table with detail  
items isn't really adequate. But only being able to display one row  
at the top level isn't appropriate either.

Is there anything that gives me the best of both? Or a way to use  
treeTable in the way I want?
--
Laurie Harper
Open Source advocate, Java geek: http://www.holoweb.net/laurie
Founder, Zotech Software: http://www.zotechsoftware.com/