You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to woden-dev@ws.apache.org by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> on 2007/02/20 00:03:40 UTC
Agenda of the Woden Status Telecon, 2007-02-20
See [1] for call and IRC information.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/dev/index.html#Weekly+Status+Call
Agenda
1. Open Action Items - Lawrence Mandel
2007-02-06 - Graham will come up with a proposal for an entity resolver.
2007-01-30 - John will start the release process for M7 including the vote
about the release.
2007-02-06
John: I've been trying to get the API javadoc up-to-date before calling
the
vote. It's taken longer than I expected but is just about done. After I
complete
this I'll create the build and call the vote.
2. Milestone 7 (M7) Status and Wrap-up - John Kaputin
3. Milestone 8 (M8) Planning - Lawrence Mandel
4. Development Discussion - All
5. Other Business - All
Thanks,
Lawrence Mandel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Agenda of the Woden Status Telecon, 2007-02-20
Posted by Jeremy Hughes <hu...@apache.org>.
On 20/02/07, John Kaputin <KA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> I'd like to propose a discussion topic for today's Woden telecon:
>
> A Woden release (possibly 1.0) to coincide with WSDL 2.0 Recommendation.
+1 to that. It would be nice to get serialization in but not essential
IMO. So it's probably not worth doing a release for PR. Would be nice
to graduate from the incubator so that the 1.0 release isn't marked as
incubating and is a fully fledged Apache project / sub project.
>
> Last week's WSDL 2.0 implementors call indicated that PR was about 3 weeks
> away and that Recommendation should follow only about 4 weeks after that.
> So, WSDL 2.0 Recommendation could happen by mid April.
>
> The last major piece of the WSDL 2.0 spec we need to support in Woden is
> the assertions. This includes adding validation for the remaining
> assertions and also some redesign of the validation architecture to make
> it easier to define validation rules and add validation rules for
> extensions. I'd like to focus my efforts on this (assuming Lawrence's
> availability will be limited) and aim for a fully WSDL 2.0 compliant
> release timed to conincide the WSDL 2.0 Recommendation.
>
> Depending on participation, this release might also contain some of the
> other outstanding functionality like serialization and WSDL 1.1
> conversion, but the main release defining criteria for this proposed
> release should be WSDL 2.0 compliance (i.e. including assertions).
Cheers,
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Agenda of the Woden Status Telecon, 2007-02-20
Posted by John Kaputin <KA...@uk.ibm.com>.
I'd like to propose a discussion topic for today's Woden telecon:
A Woden release (possibly 1.0) to coincide with WSDL 2.0 Recommendation.
Last week's WSDL 2.0 implementors call indicated that PR was about 3 weeks
away and that Recommendation should follow only about 4 weeks after that.
So, WSDL 2.0 Recommendation could happen by mid April.
The last major piece of the WSDL 2.0 spec we need to support in Woden is
the assertions. This includes adding validation for the remaining
assertions and also some redesign of the validation architecture to make
it easier to define validation rules and add validation rules for
extensions. I'd like to focus my efforts on this (assuming Lawrence's
availability will be limited) and aim for a fully WSDL 2.0 compliant
release timed to conincide the WSDL 2.0 Recommendation.
Depending on participation, this release might also contain some of the
other outstanding functionality like serialization and WSDL 1.1
conversion, but the main release defining criteria for this proposed
release should be WSDL 2.0 compliance (i.e. including assertions).
regards,
John Kaputin
Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>
19/02/2007 23:03
Please respond to
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
To
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Agenda of the Woden Status Telecon, 2007-02-20
See [1] for call and IRC information.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/dev/index.html#Weekly+Status+Call
Agenda
1. Open Action Items - Lawrence Mandel
2007-02-06 - Graham will come up with a proposal for an entity resolver.
2007-01-30 - John will start the release process for M7 including the vote
about the release.
2007-02-06
John: I've been trying to get the API javadoc up-to-date before calling
the
vote. It's taken longer than I expected but is just about done. After I
complete
this I'll create the build and call the vote.
2. Milestone 7 (M7) Status and Wrap-up - John Kaputin
3. Milestone 8 (M8) Planning - Lawrence Mandel
4. Development Discussion - All
5. Other Business - All
Thanks,
Lawrence Mandel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org