You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Jim Marino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2007/03/04 17:44:50 UTC

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-616) JavaServiceContract introspection should use the ImplementationProcessor mechanism

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jim Marino closed TUSCANY-616.
------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: Java-SCA-Mx)
                   Java-SCA-2.0-Alpha

> JavaServiceContract introspection should use the ImplementationProcessor mechanism
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-616
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-616
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java SCA Kernel
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Mx
>            Reporter: Jeremy Boynes
>             Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0-Alpha
>
>
> On the devlist, jboynes wrote: "Thinking a little more, using the ImplementationProcessor mechanisms seems like a better way to tackle this. One major advantage would be that we could add metadata to the service contract based on data type or annotations (e.g. adding metadata saying that a parameter should be bound using SDO which could be detected through the marker interface or an @SDO annotation)."

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org