You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to slide-user@jakarta.apache.org by Remy Maucherat <re...@betaversion.org> on 2001/07/09 21:03:33 UTC
Package name
Quoting rajkumar <ko...@intalio.com>:
> hi remy,
> In which package do you think that i should put the DASLQuery class
> in.
org.apache.slide.search ?
I would call the class BasicsearchQuery, using the formula classname = laguage
name + Query. What do you think ?
Remy
Re: Package name
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
> hi remy,
> Can you suggest an interface for the search helper class and also the
> search store
> which i can implement for the n3 repository.
Ok, I can do it later today, and you can send comments.
Remy
RE: Package name
Posted by Raj Kumar <ko...@intalio.com>.
hi remy,
Can you suggest an interface for the search helper class and also the
search store
which i can implement for the n3 repository.
thanks,
rajkumar
-----Original Message-----
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remy@betaversion.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 4:15 PM
To: slide-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: Package name
Quoting Raj Kumar <ko...@intalio.com>:
> hi,
> For the class BasicSearchQuery should i encapsulate the
> scope(href and depth),where(propertyname and condition) and the
> orderby(property name and order) parts of the query as seperate classes
> or
> would it be better to enscapsulate it in one single class
> BasicSearchQuery.
I think we should choose whatever solution makes the implementation simpler
(so
if having one class would make it more complex, then it should be split,
obviously).
Remy
RE: Package name
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@betaversion.org>.
Quoting Raj Kumar <ko...@intalio.com>:
> hi,
> For the class BasicSearchQuery should i encapsulate the
> scope(href and depth),where(propertyname and condition) and the
> orderby(property name and order) parts of the query as seperate classes
> or
> would it be better to enscapsulate it in one single class
> BasicSearchQuery.
I think we should choose whatever solution makes the implementation simpler (so
if having one class would make it more complex, then it should be split,
obviously).
Remy
RE: Package name
Posted by Raj Kumar <ko...@intalio.com>.
hi,
For the class BasicSearchQuery should i encapsulate the
scope(href and depth),where(propertyname and condition) and the
orderby(property name and order) parts of the query as seperate classes or
would it be better to enscapsulate it in one single class BasicSearchQuery.
thanks,
rajkumar kothapa
-----Original Message-----
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remy@betaversion.org]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:04 PM
To: slide-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Package name
Quoting rajkumar <ko...@intalio.com>:
> hi remy,
> In which package do you think that i should put the DASLQuery class
> in.
org.apache.slide.search ?
I would call the class BasicsearchQuery, using the formula classname =
laguage
name + Query. What do you think ?
Remy