You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com> on 2008/09/29 21:14:24 UTC
[VOTE] Release Mahout 0.1
Hi Team,
I just finished building a release candidate from the current 0.1
branch (rev 696307).
Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~kalle/staging-area/mahout-0.1/
as Mahout 0.1
A minimum of three binding votes (i. e. from Lucene PMC members) is
required.
karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.1
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
I think we should start over on 0.1 (i.e. delete the branch) and fix
Hoss's concerns w/ JIRA issues, and also do Mahout 79.
Thoughts?
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Karl,
>
> Anything I can do to help out here?
>
> On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:00 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
>
>> Ugh
>>
>> Thanks Hoss, I'm on it.
>>
>> Hold your votes!
>>
>>
>> karl
>>
>> 1 okt 2008 kl. 01.38 skrev Chris Hostetter:
>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, looking at this RC...
>>>
>>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout$ md5sum apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
>>> 71325edfef9b3f591973e7e7a13d0385 apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
>>>
>>> ...i don't have JAva 6 installed so i couldn't test re-compilation
>>> or
>>> running any of the examples, but i do have some ocmments on the
>>> contents
>>> of the release...
>>>
>>> 1) is the included README intended to have "TODO" as the entire
>>> "Getting Started" section ?
>>>
>>> 2) the javadocs list the version as: 0.1.2008.09.29.20.57.15 ...
>>> looks
>>> like the specversion property wasn't set when they were generated.
>>>
>>> 3) core/build.xml has javadoc.years set to "2006 - ${year}" ...
>>> none of
>>> this code is as old as 2006, correct? so i don't think that's
>>> legitimate
>>> to claim.
>>>
>>> 4) lib/ contains junit-3.8.2.jar but junit is not mentioned in
>>> NOTICE.txt
>>> ... I'm also pretty sure the JUnit license is suppose to be
>>> included in
>>> LICENSE.txt (not lib/junit-LICENSE.html)
>>>
>>> 5) ditto #4 for everything in core/lib and example/lib that isn't
>>> already
>>> included in NOTICE.txt and/or LICENSE.txt as appropriate (i don't
>>> know
>>> what most of those jars are, maybe they are mostly accounted for,
>>> but at a
>>> minimum I don't see easymock mentioned)
>>>
>>> 6) the only javadocs i see pre-built are in docs/api/ and they
>>> seem to
>>> corrispond with core/src/main/ .. should there be pre-built
>>> javadocs for
>>> examples/src/main/ as well?
>>>
>>> 7) it seems really bad that there is *zero* documentation provided
>>> beyond
>>> the javadocs ... particularly considering the javadocs have no top
>>> level
>>> info (ie: there is no overview.html in core/src/main/java/)
>>>
>>> There isn't even a single link to mahout homepage or wiki
>>> *anywhere* in
>>> the release...
>>>
>>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r
>>> "lucene.apache.org/mahout" .
>>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r
>>> "cwiki.apache.org" .
>>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Hoss
>>>
>>
>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.1
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Karl,
Anything I can do to help out here?
On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:00 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
> Ugh
>
> Thanks Hoss, I'm on it.
>
> Hold your votes!
>
>
> karl
>
> 1 okt 2008 kl. 01.38 skrev Chris Hostetter:
>
>>
>> FWIW, looking at this RC...
>>
>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout$ md5sum apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
>> 71325edfef9b3f591973e7e7a13d0385 apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
>>
>> ...i don't have JAva 6 installed so i couldn't test re-compilation or
>> running any of the examples, but i do have some ocmments on the
>> contents
>> of the release...
>>
>> 1) is the included README intended to have "TODO" as the entire
>> "Getting Started" section ?
>>
>> 2) the javadocs list the version as: 0.1.2008.09.29.20.57.15 ...
>> looks
>> like the specversion property wasn't set when they were generated.
>>
>> 3) core/build.xml has javadoc.years set to "2006 - ${year}" ...
>> none of
>> this code is as old as 2006, correct? so i don't think that's
>> legitimate
>> to claim.
>>
>> 4) lib/ contains junit-3.8.2.jar but junit is not mentioned in
>> NOTICE.txt
>> ... I'm also pretty sure the JUnit license is suppose to be
>> included in
>> LICENSE.txt (not lib/junit-LICENSE.html)
>>
>> 5) ditto #4 for everything in core/lib and example/lib that isn't
>> already
>> included in NOTICE.txt and/or LICENSE.txt as appropriate (i don't
>> know
>> what most of those jars are, maybe they are mostly accounted for,
>> but at a
>> minimum I don't see easymock mentioned)
>>
>> 6) the only javadocs i see pre-built are in docs/api/ and they seem
>> to
>> corrispond with core/src/main/ .. should there be pre-built
>> javadocs for
>> examples/src/main/ as well?
>>
>> 7) it seems really bad that there is *zero* documentation provided
>> beyond
>> the javadocs ... particularly considering the javadocs have no top
>> level
>> info (ie: there is no overview.html in core/src/main/java/)
>>
>> There isn't even a single link to mahout homepage or wiki
>> *anywhere* in
>> the release...
>>
>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r
>> "lucene.apache.org/mahout" .
>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r
>> "cwiki.apache.org" .
>> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$
>>
>>
>>
>> -Hoss
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.1
Posted by Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com>.
Ugh
Thanks Hoss, I'm on it.
Hold your votes!
karl
1 okt 2008 kl. 01.38 skrev Chris Hostetter:
>
> FWIW, looking at this RC...
>
> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout$ md5sum apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
> 71325edfef9b3f591973e7e7a13d0385 apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
>
> ...i don't have JAva 6 installed so i couldn't test re-compilation or
> running any of the examples, but i do have some ocmments on the
> contents
> of the release...
>
> 1) is the included README intended to have "TODO" as the entire
> "Getting Started" section ?
>
> 2) the javadocs list the version as: 0.1.2008.09.29.20.57.15 ... looks
> like the specversion property wasn't set when they were generated.
>
> 3) core/build.xml has javadoc.years set to "2006 - ${year}" ... none
> of
> this code is as old as 2006, correct? so i don't think that's
> legitimate
> to claim.
>
> 4) lib/ contains junit-3.8.2.jar but junit is not mentioned in
> NOTICE.txt
> ... I'm also pretty sure the JUnit license is suppose to be included
> in
> LICENSE.txt (not lib/junit-LICENSE.html)
>
> 5) ditto #4 for everything in core/lib and example/lib that isn't
> already
> included in NOTICE.txt and/or LICENSE.txt as appropriate (i don't know
> what most of those jars are, maybe they are mostly accounted for,
> but at a
> minimum I don't see easymock mentioned)
>
> 6) the only javadocs i see pre-built are in docs/api/ and they seem to
> corrispond with core/src/main/ .. should there be pre-built javadocs
> for
> examples/src/main/ as well?
>
> 7) it seems really bad that there is *zero* documentation provided
> beyond
> the javadocs ... particularly considering the javadocs have no top
> level
> info (ie: there is no overview.html in core/src/main/java/)
>
> There isn't even a single link to mahout homepage or wiki *anywhere*
> in
> the release...
>
> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r
> "lucene.apache.org/mahout" .
> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r
> "cwiki.apache.org" .
> chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.1
Posted by Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>.
FWIW, looking at this RC...
chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout$ md5sum apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
71325edfef9b3f591973e7e7a13d0385 apache-mahout-0.1.tgz
...i don't have JAva 6 installed so i couldn't test re-compilation or
running any of the examples, but i do have some ocmments on the contents
of the release...
1) is the included README intended to have "TODO" as the entire
"Getting Started" section ?
2) the javadocs list the version as: 0.1.2008.09.29.20.57.15 ... looks
like the specversion property wasn't set when they were generated.
3) core/build.xml has javadoc.years set to "2006 - ${year}" ... none of
this code is as old as 2006, correct? so i don't think that's legitimate
to claim.
4) lib/ contains junit-3.8.2.jar but junit is not mentioned in NOTICE.txt
... I'm also pretty sure the JUnit license is suppose to be included in
LICENSE.txt (not lib/junit-LICENSE.html)
5) ditto #4 for everything in core/lib and example/lib that isn't already
included in NOTICE.txt and/or LICENSE.txt as appropriate (i don't know
what most of those jars are, maybe they are mostly accounted for, but at a
minimum I don't see easymock mentioned)
6) the only javadocs i see pre-built are in docs/api/ and they seem to
corrispond with core/src/main/ .. should there be pre-built javadocs for
examples/src/main/ as well?
7) it seems really bad that there is *zero* documentation provided beyond
the javadocs ... particularly considering the javadocs have no top level
info (ie: there is no overview.html in core/src/main/java/)
There isn't even a single link to mahout homepage or wiki *anywhere* in
the release...
chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r "lucene.apache.org/mahout" .
chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$ grep -r "cwiki.apache.org" .
chrish@asimov:~/tmp/mahout/apache-mahout-0.1$
-Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.1
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > I just finished building a release candidate from the current 0.1 branch
> > (rev 696307).
> >
> > Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at
> > http://people.apache.org/~kalle/staging-area/mahout-0.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekalle/staging-area/mahout-0.1/>as Mahout 0.1
> >
> >
> > A minimum of three binding votes (i. e. from Lucene PMC members) is
> > required.
> >
> >
> > karl
> >
>
--
ted
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.1
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I just finished building a release candidate from the current 0.1 branch
> (rev 696307).
>
> Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at
> http://people.apache.org/~kalle/staging-area/mahout-0.1/ as Mahout 0.1
>
>
> A minimum of three binding votes (i. e. from Lucene PMC members) is
> required.
>
>
> karl
>