You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-user@db.apache.org by Peter Ondruška <pe...@yahoo.com> on 2014/08/01 13:46:58 UTC

Re: Difference

:-) Thanks. I considered 10.10.2.0 stable, actually for me an my use it is very stable.
 
Peter


On Thursday, 31 July 2014, 19:31, Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> wrote:
 


Hi,

10.10.2.0 has all the *new* functionality of 10.9.1.0 and 10.10.1.0. Plus it has  more bug fixes than 10.8.3.0, both because the 10.10 branch was pulled from trunk at a later time and because 10.10.2.0 was released later and thus even more fixes were back-ported. It therefore also has more possible incompatibilities to older versions.

10.8.3.0 only has the most important fixes available at the time of release back-ported, and has very few incompatibilities compared to e.g. 10.8.2.


There were some plans to make a 10.9.2 at one time but that fell by the wayside. It would have replaced the 10.8.3.0.

Myrna




On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com> wrote:

On 7/31/14 4:07 AM, Peter Ondruška wrote:
>
>Dear all,
>>
>>what is the difference between version 10.10.2.0 and 10.8.3.0? Or why is there 10.8.3.0 along with 10.10.2.0? Thanks
>>Peter
>>
The "Latest Official Releases" tend to be the latest releases produced on the 2 most active release branches. Once we publish 10.11.1, I expect that we'll remove 10.8.3.0 from that list. Right after we produce a feature release, the list has this meaning:
>
>i) The top release is the most feature-rich distribution.
>
>ii) The second release is the most stable distribution.
>
>Hope this helps,
>-Rick
>