You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> on 2010/12/12 22:09:15 UTC
release karaf-2.1.3?
Hey guys,
How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
WDYT?
kind regards,
andreas
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Karaf-343: The issue doesn't mention if the upgrade is to take in a
needed bug fix or if this represents new functionality -- as a patch
release we should only be updating for fixes, not features (if new
features then full backward compatibility must be confirmed).
Other than Karaf-333 and Karaf-344 it appears we have all the issues
reported resolved for this patch release round, as such this is a good
time for everyone to start trying out their latest snapshot builds on
their target platforms (IBM Java, HPUX, Windows, etc).
Looking forward to starting the release process and getting a vote
started early in the new year :)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
> missing:
>
> KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
> gnodet can you do this please?)
>
> KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>
> KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>
> --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
> ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>
> WDYT?
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good, so just KARAF-343 left in the todo list :)
I'll start preparing my environment for a run at a Karaf 2.1.3 release
candidate.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem for not including new features is to reduce the risk of
> regressions and incompatbilities.
> I'd think this can be deferred to 2.2.0.
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 13:40, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Another issue appeared under the 2.1.x JIRA, KARAF-353. It's not
>> actually a bug, it's a feature request. The feature the user is
>> requesting doesn't sound like it would break backwards compatibility
>> however it does go against our general 'only bug fixes' stance on
>> patch branches. WDYT?
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
>>> release for that one on monday too.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ok, thanks
>>>>
>>>> kind regards,
>>>> andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>>>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>>>> fixed.
>>>>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>>>> >> > missing:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>>>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>>>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Which one is that?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>>>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > WDYT?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > kind regards,
>>>>> >> > andreas
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>> >> >> Hey guys,
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>>>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>>>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>>>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> WDYT?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> kind regards,
>>>>> >> >> andreas
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
The problem for not including new features is to reduce the risk of
regressions and incompatbilities.
I'd think this can be deferred to 2.2.0.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 13:40, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another issue appeared under the 2.1.x JIRA, KARAF-353. It's not
> actually a bug, it's a feature request. The feature the user is
> requesting doesn't sound like it would break backwards compatibility
> however it does go against our general 'only bug fixes' stance on
> patch branches. WDYT?
>
> Jamie
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
>> release for that one on monday too.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ok, thanks
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> andreas
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>>> fixed.
>>>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>>> >> > missing:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>>>> >
>>>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Which one is that?
>>>> >
>>>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > WDYT?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > kind regards,
>>>> >> > andreas
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>> >> >> Hey guys,
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> WDYT?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> kind regards,
>>>> >> >> andreas
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Another issue appeared under the 2.1.x JIRA, KARAF-353. It's not
actually a bug, it's a feature request. The feature the user is
requesting doesn't sound like it would break backwards compatibility
however it does go against our general 'only bug fixes' stance on
patch branches. WDYT?
Jamie
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
> release for that one on monday too.
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ok, thanks
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>> fixed.
>>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>> >> > missing:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>> >>
>>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>>> >
>>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>> >>
>>> >> Which one is that?
>>> >
>>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>> >> >
>>> >> > WDYT?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > kind regards,
>>> >> > andreas
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>> >> >> Hey guys,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> WDYT?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> kind regards,
>>> >> >> andreas
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>> >> ------------------------
>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> >> ------------------------
>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
release for that one on monday too.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok, thanks
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>> fixed.
>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>> >> > missing:
>> >> >
>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>> >>
>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>> >
>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>> >>
>> >> Which one is that?
>> >
>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>> >> >
>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>> >> >
>> >> > WDYT?
>> >> >
>> >> > kind regards,
>> >> > andreas
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> >> >> Hey guys,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> WDYT?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> kind regards,
>> >> >> andreas
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
ok, thanks
kind regards,
andreas
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
> fixed.
> I'll investigate on monday too.
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
> >> > missing:
> >> >
> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
> >>
> >> I'll do that on monday.
> >
> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
> >>
> >> Which one is that?
> >
> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
> >> >
> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
> >> >
> >> > WDYT?
> >> >
> >> > kind regards,
> >> > andreas
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >> >> Hey guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
> >> >>
> >> >> WDYT?
> >> >>
> >> >> kind regards,
> >> >> andreas
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >> ------------------------
> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >> ------------------------
> >> Open Source SOA
> >> http://fusesource.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sorry cross post of the JVM discussion to the 2.1.3 release thread.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We probably need to setup a roadmap page for Karaf where we can
> indicate major changes such as JVM support.
>
> Is this something we should tackle now or as part of the site updates?
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 :)
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:16AM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>>> Sounds good :)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Actually the problems on fileinstall or on the 3.1.0 and 3.1.2, so we
>>> > don't really need to upgrade karaf 2.1.x to fileinstall 3.1.x (afaik,
>>> > we can keep fileinstall 3.0.2 which works fine).
>>> > I'll do some check on KARAF-327 and we should be good to go.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>> >> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>> >> fixed.
>>> >> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> >>>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>> >>>> > missing:
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>> >>>> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'll do that on monday.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>> >>> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Which one is that?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>> >>>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > WDYT?
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > kind regards,
>>> >>>> > andreas
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>> >>>> >> Hey guys,
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>> >>>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>> >>>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>> >>>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>> >>>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> WDYT?
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> kind regards,
>>> >>>> >> andreas
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> >>>> ------------------------
>>> >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> >>>> ------------------------
>>> >>>> Open Source SOA
>>> >>>> http://fusesource.com
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>> >> ------------------------
>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> >> ------------------------
>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Guillaume Nodet
>>> > ------------------------
>>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> > ------------------------
>>> > Open Source SOA
>>> > http://fusesource.com
>>> >
>>
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
We probably need to setup a roadmap page for Karaf where we can
indicate major changes such as JVM support.
Is this something we should tackle now or as part of the site updates?
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 :)
>
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:16AM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>> Sounds good :)
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Actually the problems on fileinstall or on the 3.1.0 and 3.1.2, so we
>> > don't really need to upgrade karaf 2.1.x to fileinstall 3.1.x (afaik,
>> > we can keep fileinstall 3.0.2 which works fine).
>> > I'll do some check on KARAF-327 and we should be good to go.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>> >> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>> >> fixed.
>> >> I'll investigate on monday too.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >>>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>> >>>> > missing:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>> >>>> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'll do that on monday.
>> >>>
>> >>> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>> >>> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Which one is that?
>> >>>
>> >>> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>> >>>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > WDYT?
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > kind regards,
>> >>>> > andreas
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> >>>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>> >>>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>> >>>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>> >>>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>> >>>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> WDYT?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> kind regards,
>> >>>> >> andreas
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>> Guillaume Nodet
>> >>>> ------------------------
>> >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >>>> ------------------------
>> >>>> Open Source SOA
>> >>>> http://fusesource.com
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > ------------------------
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> > ------------------------
>> > Open Source SOA
>> > http://fusesource.com
>> >
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 :)
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:16AM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
> Sounds good :)
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Actually the problems on fileinstall or on the 3.1.0 and 3.1.2, so we
> > don't really need to upgrade karaf 2.1.x to fileinstall 3.1.x (afaik,
> > we can keep fileinstall 3.0.2 which works fine).
> > I'll do some check on KARAF-327 and we should be good to go.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
> >> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
> >> fixed.
> >> I'll investigate on monday too.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
> >>>> > missing:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
> >>>> > gnodet can you do this please?)
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll do that on monday.
> >>>
> >>> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
> >>> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
> >>>>
> >>>> Which one is that?
> >>>
> >>> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
> >>>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
> >>>> >
> >>>> > WDYT?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > kind regards,
> >>>> > andreas
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >>>> >> Hey guys,
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> >>>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
> >>>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
> >>>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
> >>>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> WDYT?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> kind regards,
> >>>> >> andreas
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Guillaume Nodet
> >>>> ------------------------
> >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>>> ------------------------
> >>>> Open Source SOA
> >>>> http://fusesource.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >> ------------------------
> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >> ------------------------
> >> Open Source SOA
> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > ------------------------
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com
> >
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good :)
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually the problems on fileinstall or on the 3.1.0 and 3.1.2, so we
> don't really need to upgrade karaf 2.1.x to fileinstall 3.1.x (afaik,
> we can keep fileinstall 3.0.2 which works fine).
> I'll do some check on KARAF-327 and we should be good to go.
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>> fixed.
>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>>> > missing:
>>>> >
>>>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>>> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>>>
>>>> I'll do that on monday.
>>>
>>> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>>>
>>>> Which one is that?
>>>
>>> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>>> >
>>>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>>> >
>>>> > WDYT?
>>>> >
>>>> > kind regards,
>>>> > andreas
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>> >> Hey guys,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> WDYT?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> kind regards,
>>>> >> andreas
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Actually the problems on fileinstall or on the 3.1.0 and 3.1.2, so we
don't really need to upgrade karaf 2.1.x to fileinstall 3.1.x (afaik,
we can keep fileinstall 3.0.2 which works fine).
I'll do some check on KARAF-327 and we should be good to go.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
> fixed.
> I'll investigate on monday too.
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>> > missing:
>>> >
>>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>>
>>> I'll do that on monday.
>>
>> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>>
>>> Which one is that?
>>
>> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>> >
>>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>> >
>>> > WDYT?
>>> >
>>> > kind regards,
>>> > andreas
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>> >> Hey guys,
>>> >>
>>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>> >>
>>> >> WDYT?
>>> >>
>>> >> kind regards,
>>> >> andreas
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
fixed.
I'll investigate on monday too.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>> > missing:
>> >
>> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>
>> I'll do that on monday.
>
> thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
> installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>
>>
>> >
>> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>
>> Which one is that?
>
> Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>
>>
>> >
>> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>> >
>> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > kind regards,
>> > andreas
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>> >>
>> >> WDYT?
>> >>
>> >> kind regards,
>> >> andreas
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
> > missing:
> >
> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>
> I'll do that on monday.
thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>
> >
> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>
> Which one is that?
Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>
> >
> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
> >
> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > kind regards,
> > andreas
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> kind regards,
> >> andreas
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
> missing:
>
> KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
> gnodet can you do this please?)
I'll do that on monday.
>
> KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
Which one is that?
>
> KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>
> --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
> ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>
> WDYT?
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
missing:
KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
gnodet can you do this please?)
KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
--> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
WDYT?
kind regards,
andreas
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>
> WDYT?
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
+1; I've reopened KARAF-327 and set a target version for 2.1.3 too
kind regards,
andreas
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 06:13:19AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Achim,
>
> yeah, agree. As it's a bug fix, it could be included in Karaf 2.1.3.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/18/2010 08:37 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I might have another one which could be interesting for 2.1.3
> >that would be KARAF-327
> >
> >what do you think?
> >
> >
> >>I've reopend both and set release target also to 2.1.3
> >>
> >>Now we only have to fix them for 2.1.x :)
> >>
> >>kind regards,
> >>andreas
> >>
> >>On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:19:31AM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> >>>+1 for
> >>>
> >>>KARAF-282
> >>>KARAF-299
> >>>
> >>>2010/12/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
> >>>
> >>>>Here's my point of view:
> >>>>
> >>>>KARAF-301: no interest to merge on 2.1.x. This issue concerns unit tests
> >>>>and it's more important for the trunk.
> >>>>KARAF-282: agree to merge on 2.1.x.
> >>>>KARAF-299: agree to merge on 2.1.x
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards
> >>>>JB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
> >>>>>interesting for backporting:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
> >>>>>
> >>>>>All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
> >>>>>directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that
> >>>>>easy to
> >>>>>port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>WDYT?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>kind regards,
> >>>>>andreas
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Hey guys,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> >>>>>>included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
> >>>>>>already
> >>>>>>attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
> >>>>>>one or
> >>>>>>two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
> >>>>>>to
> >>>>>>include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>WDYT?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>kind regards,
> >>>>>>andreas
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>---------------------------------
> >>>> HomePage
> >>>>http://www.nanthrax.net
> >>>>---------------------------------
> >>>> Contacts
> >>>>jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>>jb@nanthrax.net
> >>>>---------------------------------
> >>>> OpenSource
> >>>>BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
> >>>>http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> >>>>Apache ServiceMix
> >>>>http://servicemix.apache.org
> >>>>-----------------------------------
> >>>>PGP : 17D4F086
> >>>>
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> ---------------------------------
> HomePage
> http://www.nanthrax.net
> ---------------------------------
> Contacts
> jbonofre@apache.org
> jb@nanthrax.net
> ---------------------------------
> OpenSource
> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> Apache ServiceMix
> http://servicemix.apache.org
> -----------------------------------
> PGP : 17D4F086
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Achim,
yeah, agree. As it's a bug fix, it could be included in Karaf 2.1.3.
Regards
JB
On 12/18/2010 08:37 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might have another one which could be interesting for 2.1.3
> that would be KARAF-327
>
> what do you think?
>
>
>> I've reopend both and set release target also to 2.1.3
>>
>> Now we only have to fix them for 2.1.x :)
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:19:31AM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>>> +1 for
>>>
>>> KARAF-282
>>> KARAF-299
>>>
>>> 2010/12/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>
>>>> Here's my point of view:
>>>>
>>>> KARAF-301: no interest to merge on 2.1.x. This issue concerns unit tests
>>>> and it's more important for the trunk.
>>>> KARAF-282: agree to merge on 2.1.x.
>>>> KARAF-299: agree to merge on 2.1.x
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
>>>>> interesting for backporting:
>>>>>
>>>>> KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
>>>>>
>>>>> All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
>>>>>
>>>>> While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
>>>>> directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that
>>>>> easy to
>>>>> port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>> andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>>>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
>>>>>> already
>>>>>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
>>>>>> one or
>>>>>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>>> andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> HomePage
>>>> http://www.nanthrax.net
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> Contacts
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> jb@nanthrax.net
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> OpenSource
>>>> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
>>>> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
>>>> Apache ServiceMix
>>>> http://servicemix.apache.org
>>>> -----------------------------------
>>>> PGP : 17D4F086
>>>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
---------------------------------
HomePage
http://www.nanthrax.net
---------------------------------
Contacts
jbonofre@apache.org
jb@nanthrax.net
---------------------------------
OpenSource
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
Apache ServiceMix
http://servicemix.apache.org
-----------------------------------
PGP : 17D4F086
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
I might have another one which could be interesting for 2.1.3
that would be KARAF-327
what do you think?
> I've reopend both and set release target also to 2.1.3
>
> Now we only have to fix them for 2.1.x :)
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:19:31AM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>> +1 for
>>
>> KARAF-282
>> KARAF-299
>>
>> 2010/12/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>
>>> Here's my point of view:
>>>
>>> KARAF-301: no interest to merge on 2.1.x. This issue concerns unit tests
>>> and it's more important for the trunk.
>>> KARAF-282: agree to merge on 2.1.x.
>>> KARAF-299: agree to merge on 2.1.x
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
>>>> interesting for backporting:
>>>>
>>>> KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
>>>>
>>>> All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
>>>>
>>>> While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
>>>> directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that
>>>> easy to
>>>> port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> kind regards,
>>>> andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
>>>>> already
>>>>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
>>>>> one or
>>>>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
>>>>> to
>>>>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>> andreas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> HomePage
>>> http://www.nanthrax.net
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Contacts
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> jb@nanthrax.net
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> OpenSource
>>> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
>>> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
>>> Apache ServiceMix
>>> http://servicemix.apache.org
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> PGP : 17D4F086
>>>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
I've reopend both and set release target also to 2.1.3
Now we only have to fix them for 2.1.x :)
kind regards,
andreas
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:19:31AM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> +1 for
>
> KARAF-282
> KARAF-299
>
> 2010/12/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>
> > Here's my point of view:
> >
> > KARAF-301: no interest to merge on 2.1.x. This issue concerns unit tests
> > and it's more important for the trunk.
> > KARAF-282: agree to merge on 2.1.x.
> > KARAF-299: agree to merge on 2.1.x
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
> >> interesting for backporting:
> >>
> >> KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
> >>
> >> All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
> >>
> >> While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
> >> directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that
> >> easy to
> >> port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> kind regards,
> >> andreas
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> >>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
> >>> already
> >>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
> >>> one or
> >>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
> >>> to
> >>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
> >>>
> >>> WDYT?
> >>>
> >>> kind regards,
> >>> andreas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > ---------------------------------
> > HomePage
> > http://www.nanthrax.net
> > ---------------------------------
> > Contacts
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > jb@nanthrax.net
> > ---------------------------------
> > OpenSource
> > BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
> > http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> > Apache ServiceMix
> > http://servicemix.apache.org
> > -----------------------------------
> > PGP : 17D4F086
> >
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
+1 for
KARAF-282
KARAF-299
2010/12/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> Here's my point of view:
>
> KARAF-301: no interest to merge on 2.1.x. This issue concerns unit tests
> and it's more important for the trunk.
> KARAF-282: agree to merge on 2.1.x.
> KARAF-299: agree to merge on 2.1.x
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
>
> On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>
>> Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
>> interesting for backporting:
>>
>> KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
>>
>> All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
>>
>> While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
>> directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that
>> easy to
>> port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
>>> already
>>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
>>> one or
>>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
>>> to
>>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> andreas
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> ---------------------------------
> HomePage
> http://www.nanthrax.net
> ---------------------------------
> Contacts
> jbonofre@apache.org
> jb@nanthrax.net
> ---------------------------------
> OpenSource
> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> Apache ServiceMix
> http://servicemix.apache.org
> -----------------------------------
> PGP : 17D4F086
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Here's my point of view:
KARAF-301: no interest to merge on 2.1.x. This issue concerns unit tests
and it's more important for the trunk.
KARAF-282: agree to merge on 2.1.x.
KARAF-299: agree to merge on 2.1.x
Regards
JB
On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
> interesting for backporting:
>
> KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
>
> All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
>
> While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
> directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that easy to
> port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
>
> WDYT?
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
---------------------------------
HomePage
http://www.nanthrax.net
---------------------------------
Contacts
jbonofre@apache.org
jb@nanthrax.net
---------------------------------
OpenSource
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
Apache ServiceMix
http://servicemix.apache.org
-----------------------------------
PGP : 17D4F086
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
interesting for backporting:
KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that easy to
port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
WDYT?
kind regards,
andreas
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>
> WDYT?
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Absolutely :)
Just wanted to let Andreas know about the irc channel.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Though remember all decisions have to be done on the public mailing list ...
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:00, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh, as a head's up - a large portion of the Karaf development
>> community hang out on irc.codehaus.org (port 6667) in the #karaf room,
>> please feel free to log in and join the conversations :)
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> HI Andreas,
>>>
>>> I have an entry in Karaf's Jira for performing the 2.1.3 release:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-322
>>>
>>> I'd be more than happy to start the process once we have the currently
>>> reported issues resolved. In the mean time, we need to ensure that the
>>> improvements do not cause any backward compatibility issues. Any kit
>>> testing on the current 2.1.x snapshot builds would be highly
>>> appreciated as well :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jamie
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>>> Of course, that's why I would like to track the Jira.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/13/2010 07:49 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please make sure we keep full backward compatibility and that those
>>>>> enhancements are small enough to not cause any regressions.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, December 13, 2010, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that we can back merge some other enhancement performed on the
>>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will take a look today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/12/2010 10:09 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>>>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
>>>>>> already
>>>>>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
>>>>>> one or
>>>>>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>>> andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Though remember all decisions have to be done on the public mailing list ...
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:00, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, as a head's up - a large portion of the Karaf development
> community hang out on irc.codehaus.org (port 6667) in the #karaf room,
> please feel free to log in and join the conversations :)
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> HI Andreas,
>>
>> I have an entry in Karaf's Jira for performing the 2.1.3 release:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-322
>>
>> I'd be more than happy to start the process once we have the currently
>> reported issues resolved. In the mean time, we need to ensure that the
>> improvements do not cause any backward compatibility issues. Any kit
>> testing on the current 2.1.x snapshot builds would be highly
>> appreciated as well :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jamie
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>> Of course, that's why I would like to track the Jira.
>>>
>>> On 12/13/2010 07:49 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please make sure we keep full backward compatibility and that those
>>>> enhancements are small enough to not cause any regressions.
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, December 13, 2010, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that we can back merge some other enhancement performed on the
>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will take a look today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/12/2010 10:09 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
>>>>> already
>>>>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
>>>>> one or
>>>>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
>>>>> to
>>>>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>> andreas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Oh, as a head's up - a large portion of the Karaf development
community hang out on irc.codehaus.org (port 6667) in the #karaf room,
please feel free to log in and join the conversations :)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI Andreas,
>
> I have an entry in Karaf's Jira for performing the 2.1.3 release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-322
>
> I'd be more than happy to start the process once we have the currently
> reported issues resolved. In the mean time, we need to ensure that the
> improvements do not cause any backward compatibility issues. Any kit
> testing on the current 2.1.x snapshot builds would be highly
> appreciated as well :)
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Of course, that's why I would like to track the Jira.
>>
>> On 12/13/2010 07:49 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>> Please make sure we keep full backward compatibility and that those
>>> enhancements are small enough to not cause any regressions.
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 13, 2010, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>
>>>> I think that we can back merge some other enhancement performed on the
>>>> trunk.
>>>>
>>>> I will take a look today.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2010 10:09 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
>>>> already
>>>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
>>>> one or
>>>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
>>>> to
>>>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> kind regards,
>>>> andreas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
HI Andreas,
I have an entry in Karaf's Jira for performing the 2.1.3 release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-322
I'd be more than happy to start the process once we have the currently
reported issues resolved. In the mean time, we need to ensure that the
improvements do not cause any backward compatibility issues. Any kit
testing on the current 2.1.x snapshot builds would be highly
appreciated as well :)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Of course, that's why I would like to track the Jira.
>
> On 12/13/2010 07:49 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> Please make sure we keep full backward compatibility and that those
>> enhancements are small enough to not cause any regressions.
>>
>> On Monday, December 13, 2010, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> I think that we can back merge some other enhancement performed on the
>>> trunk.
>>>
>>> I will take a look today.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2010 10:09 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
>>> already
>>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
>>> one or
>>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
>>> to
>>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> andreas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Of course, that's why I would like to track the Jira.
On 12/13/2010 07:49 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Please make sure we keep full backward compatibility and that those
> enhancements are small enough to not cause any regressions.
>
> On Monday, December 13, 2010, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I think that we can back merge some other enhancement performed on the trunk.
>>
>> I will take a look today.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 12/12/2010 10:09 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Please make sure we keep full backward compatibility and that those
enhancements are small enough to not cause any regressions.
On Monday, December 13, 2010, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I think that we can back merge some other enhancement performed on the trunk.
>
> I will take a look today.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/12/2010 10:09 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>
> WDYT?
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Andreas,
I think that we can back merge some other enhancement performed on the
trunk.
I will take a look today.
Regards
JB
On 12/12/2010 10:09 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>
> WDYT?
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>