You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/06/30 05:07:31 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3260) need a test that uses
termsenum.seekExact() (which returns true), then calls next()
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057596#comment-13057596 ]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3260:
------------------------------------
Patch looks good Mike.
One minor comment, atLeast(200) means we'll always run at least 200 iterations. Did you do it only for capturing the bug? Robert and Simon have done a great job at speeding up tests, so perhaps we should have a lower value, like 10 here?
> need a test that uses termsenum.seekExact() (which returns true), then calls next()
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-3260.patch
>
>
> i tried to do some seekExact (where the result must exist) then next()ing in the faceting module,
> and it seems like there could be a bug here.
> I think we should add a test that mixes seekExact/seekCeil/next like this, to ensure that
> if seekExact returns true, that the enum is properly positioned.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org