You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Sujit Acharyya-choudhury <s....@bbk.ac.uk> on 2015/08/18 15:20:55 UTC
Mailblacklist.com
I think the answer is there has been enough discussion on this topic. It is
up to the user to use it or not. The discussion can stop and we can go to
other things, like why so many phishes are coming through etc. for example
where the message look more or less the same.
Re: WAS: Re: Mailblacklist.com
Posted by Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>.
Am 18.08.2015 um 23:17 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> Axb skrev den 2015-08-18 15:29:
>
>> .. then pls start a new thread, pastebin samples and give rule
>> writers/analysts something to work with.
>
> there was no references in the msg you replyed to, unfair ?
typical Benny, looks like you read what you quote
"like why so many phishes are coming through etc" what AXB referred
On 18.08.2015 15:20, Sujit Acharyya-choudhury wrote:
> I think the answer is there has been enough discussion on this topic.
It is
> up to the user to use it or not. The discussion can stop and we can go to
> other things, like why so many phishes are coming through etc. for
example
> where the message look more or less the same.
> imho better to use phishtank or trustpilot or even wot if phishers like
> to have fun
>
> read the thread about it recently
Re: WAS: Re: Mailblacklist.com
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>.
Axb skrev den 2015-08-18 15:29:
> .. then pls start a new thread, pastebin samples and give rule
> writers/analysts something to work with.
there was no references in the msg you replyed to, unfair ?
imho better to use phishtank or trustpilot or even wot if phishers like
to have fun
read the thread about it recently
WAS: Re: Mailblacklist.com
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 18.08.2015 15:20, Sujit Acharyya-choudhury wrote:
> I think the answer is there has been enough discussion on this topic. It is
> up to the user to use it or not. The discussion can stop and we can go to
> other things, like why so many phishes are coming through etc. for example
> where the message look more or less the same.
.. then pls start a new thread, pastebin samples and give rule
writers/analysts something to work with.