You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu> on 2012/02/01 14:50:59 UTC
[VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
(Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted
it before doing release:perform)
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
The artifacts look right. The distribution archives unpack correctly, and a
spot check of MD5 worked for me. The contents look right. The distro builds
and tests pass. As far as I can tell it looks correct to me. +1
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here: https://repository.apache.org/**
> content/repositories/**orgapachemahout-169/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/>
>
> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>
> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted
> it before doing release:perform)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Dmitriy Lyubimov <dl...@gmail.com>.
I've run my standard benchmark test for 4.5Mx4.5M sparse matrix SSVD
in our qa cluster with this RC. seems fine. +1.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>
> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>
> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted it
> before doing release:perform)
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> It's available in our repo separately from the packages. Hmm, maybe nice to
> get it in the distribution package too, I don't know why it isn't. It is in
> the others, where it's not as useful. I think it's most vital to have it
> available outside the package since it is for verifying the packages
> themselves, and it is.
Yep. In the end, if we have to put it there by hand, we can likely do so. At any rate, I got Shannon's key. Initial things look good, but I'm still doing some testing.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> OK, I see it when unzipping the source zip
>> (mahout-0.6-source-release.zip). Don't see it in the
>> mahout-distribution-0.6-src.tar.gz one.
>>
>> I think we also (and we probably already do) have to put it outside the
>> actual packages.
>>
>> -Grant
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>>
>>> KEYS has always lived under distribution/KEYS, or at least as long as I
>>> remember. Shannon's is in there.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shannon, Others,
>>>>
>>>> Is your key in a public place?
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#public-key-not-found But I do
>>>> see it at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/squinn.asc
>>>>
>>>> Also, I believe we need a KEYS file. We used to have one. What
>> happened
>>>> to ours?
>>>>
>>>> Doing more testing...
>>>>
>>>> -Grant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and
>> deleted
>>>> it before doing release:perform)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> Grant Ingersoll
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
It's available in our repo separately from the packages. Hmm, maybe nice to
get it in the distribution package too, I don't know why it isn't. It is in
the others, where it's not as useful. I think it's most vital to have it
available outside the package since it is for verifying the packages
themselves, and it is.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> OK, I see it when unzipping the source zip
> (mahout-0.6-source-release.zip). Don't see it in the
> mahout-distribution-0.6-src.tar.gz one.
>
> I think we also (and we probably already do) have to put it outside the
> actual packages.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
> > KEYS has always lived under distribution/KEYS, or at least as long as I
> > remember. Shannon's is in there.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Shannon, Others,
> >>
> >> Is your key in a public place?
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#public-key-not-found But I do
> >> see it at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/squinn.asc
> >>
> >> Also, I believe we need a KEYS file. We used to have one. What
> happened
> >> to ours?
> >>
> >> Doing more testing...
> >>
> >> -Grant
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
> >>
> >>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
> >>>
> >>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and
> deleted
> >> it before doing release:perform)
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
OK, I see it when unzipping the source zip (mahout-0.6-source-release.zip). Don't see it in the mahout-distribution-0.6-src.tar.gz one.
I think we also (and we probably already do) have to put it outside the actual packages.
-Grant
On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> KEYS has always lived under distribution/KEYS, or at least as long as I
> remember. Shannon's is in there.
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Shannon, Others,
>>
>> Is your key in a public place?
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#public-key-not-found But I do
>> see it at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/squinn.asc
>>
>> Also, I believe we need a KEYS file. We used to have one. What happened
>> to ours?
>>
>> Doing more testing...
>>
>> -Grant
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>
>>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>
>>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>>
>>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted
>> it before doing release:perform)
>>
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
KEYS has always lived under distribution/KEYS, or at least as long as I
remember. Shannon's is in there.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Shannon, Others,
>
> Is your key in a public place?
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#public-key-not-found But I do
> see it at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/squinn.asc
>
> Also, I believe we need a KEYS file. We used to have one. What happened
> to ours?
>
> Doing more testing...
>
> -Grant
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>
> > RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
> >
> > Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
> >
> > (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted
> it before doing release:perform)
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu>.
Ooh, I may have forgotten about the public distribution part; I thought I put it on MIT's key server but maybe not. Will check tonight.
iPhone'd
On Feb 1, 2012, at 16:45, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Shannon, Others,
>
> Is your key in a public place? http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#public-key-not-found But I do see it at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/squinn.asc
>
> Also, I believe we need a KEYS file. We used to have one. What happened to ours?
>
> Doing more testing...
>
> -Grant
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>
>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>
>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>
>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted it before doing release:perform)
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Shannon, Others,
Is your key in a public place? http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#public-key-not-found But I do see it at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/squinn.asc
Also, I believe we need a KEYS file. We used to have one. What happened to ours?
Doing more testing...
-Grant
On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>
> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>
> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted it before doing release:perform)
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
Hi,
See reply inline.
On 02/03/2012 06:30 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Great stuff!
>
> Do this mean that we'd want Mahout 0.6 in Bigtop 0.3.0?
>
That sounds reasonable.
Do you see any reason not to?
> Also, would you be willing to try and see whether we can
> pull Mahout 0.6 into hadoop-0.23 and still have the patches
> apply?
>
Agreed. This is on my todo list, but I haven't gotten to it yet.
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
On 02/04/2012 04:03 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Bruno Mahé <br...@bmahe.net> wrote:
>> On 02/03/2012 06:30 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> Great stuff!
>>>
>>> Do this mean that we'd want Mahout 0.6 in Bigtop 0.3.0?
>>>
>>
>> That sounds reasonable.
>> Do you see any reason not to?
>
> My main concern is stability. And I'm not talking rock solid here,
> but rather a stream of patch release that could follow 0.6. The
> trouble is -- Mahout is one of the few projects into which I have
> absolutely no insight into :-(
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
A cursory test (ie. running examples) worked for me.
But let's run the tests we have. That's what they are for :)
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Bruno Mahé <br...@bmahe.net> wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 06:30 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Great stuff!
>>
>> Do this mean that we'd want Mahout 0.6 in Bigtop 0.3.0?
>>
>
> That sounds reasonable.
> Do you see any reason not to?
My main concern is stability. And I'm not talking rock solid here,
but rather a stream of patch release that could follow 0.6. The
trouble is -- Mahout is one of the few projects into which I have
absolutely no insight into :-(
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
Great stuff!
Do this mean that we'd want Mahout 0.6 in Bigtop 0.3.0?
Also, would you be willing to try and see whether we can
pull Mahout 0.6 into hadoop-0.23 and still have the patches
apply?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 05:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>
>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>
>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and
>> deleted it before doing release:perform)
>
> Hi,
>
> For those who want an easy way to install/test/remove this RC, there is
> an updated Apache Bigtop (incubating) package available in the RC branch
> for your favourite GNU/Linux distribution.
> Packages available are:
> * CentOS 5:
> http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=centos5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
>
> * CentOS 6:
> http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=centos6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
>
> * Fedora 15:
> http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=fedora15/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
>
> * Fedora 16:
> http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=fedora16/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
>
> * Ubuntu Lucid:
> http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=lucid/
>
> * SLES 11:
> http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=sles11/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
>
> All of this is based on unreleased work and is only meant for testing
> purpose.
> Don't hesitate to let me know if you encounter any issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruno
>
> Note: I am CCing mahout dev mailing list since there may be some folks
> interested by this email
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
On 02/01/2012 05:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>
> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>
> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and
> deleted it before doing release:perform)
Hi,
For those who want an easy way to install/test/remove this RC, there is
an updated Apache Bigtop (incubating) package available in the RC branch
for your favourite GNU/Linux distribution.
Packages available are:
* CentOS 5:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=centos5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* CentOS 6:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=centos6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* Fedora 15:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=fedora15/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* Fedora 16:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=fedora16/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* Ubuntu Lucid:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=lucid/
* SLES 11:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=sles11/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
All of this is based on unreleased work and is only meant for testing
purpose.
Don't hesitate to let me know if you encounter any issue.
Thanks,
Bruno
Note: I am CCing mahout dev mailing list since there may be some folks
interested by this email
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>.
examples/bin/asf-examples.sh failes in bayes classification: choose 3,
then 1. It defaults to mapreduce but does not set 'mapRedOutputDir',
whatever that is.
My apologies for my mis-created patch for making bayes classification
work. I missed that Bayes uses sparse encoding and SGD uses hash
encoding- this is why the script had terrible results.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Jeff Eastman <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
> +1 Checked out & built for me. Ran some tests locally.
>
>
> On 2/4/12 12:34 PM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>
>> I count 3 +1s so far; technically the 72 hour period is up as of today. If
>> I don't hear any objections by the end of the day I'll move forward.
>>
>> On 2/3/2012 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 on releasing. Checked sigs. Ran examples locally. Ran tests.
>>>
>>> Man, that is a lot of artifacts. Do we really need bzip, gzip and zip?
>>>
>>> FWIW, here's what I use to get the artifacts locally: wget -l 10 -e
>>> robots=off --wait 1 --no-check-certificate -nd -np -r
>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>>
>>>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>>
>>>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted
>>>> it before doing release:perform)
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>.
I'm still chewing on the asf-examples.sh problem, but that is
technically ok: the examples and other ancillary files are not
packaged with artifacts. You have to do a full checkout to play with
them anyway. There is only a problem if some does a full checkout at
the 0.6 tag
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu> wrote:
>>> If all the artifacts are in place, make sure the web site is updated,
>>> send
>>> the announcements to user@ and dev@, close out old issues in JIRA, etc --
>>> just the last bits documented on the wiki.
>>
>> I don't recall seeing the release announcement, did I miss that?
>
> Not yet! Just got admin permissions on JIRA and marked 0.6 as released.
> Stand by...
>
--
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu>.
>> If all the artifacts are in place, make sure the web site is updated, send
>> the announcements to user@ and dev@, close out old issues in JIRA, etc --
>> just the last bits documented on the wiki.
> I don't recall seeing the release announcement, did I miss that?
Not yet! Just got admin permissions on JIRA and marked 0.6 as released.
Stand by...
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Feb 6, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> The release is already built, voted, pushed out. If anything we'd be
> contemplating a "1.6.1" release, but this hardly sounds like a major issue.
> I believe you proceed.
+1.
>
> If all the artifacts are in place, make sure the web site is updated, send
> the announcements to user@ and dev@, close out old issues in JIRA, etc --
> just the last bits documented on the wiki.
I don't recall seeing the release announcement, did I miss that?
>
> Then we can all look at open issues again. On the one hand, the bad news is
> we have a bigger backlog than ever; there are clearly still problems
> getting worse there. But, a lot are easy to fix.
yeah, we need to get cranking on next stuff.
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
I don't know what the "Bamboo" message is about; I've never seen that.
Is it successfully "released"?
I made you a project admin on JIRA.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> As soon as someone with administrator privileges on JIRA either grants me
> the same or marks 0.6 as "released", that's the final step. I'll send out
> the notifications to the mailing lists immediately thereafter.
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu>.
As soon as someone with administrator privileges on JIRA either grants
me the same or marks 0.6 as "released", that's the final step. I'll send
out the notifications to the mailing lists immediately thereafter.
On 2/6/2012 11:45 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> The release is already built, voted, pushed out. If anything we'd be
> contemplating a "1.6.1" release, but this hardly sounds like a major issue.
> I believe you proceed.
>
> If all the artifacts are in place, make sure the web site is updated, send
> the announcements to user@ and dev@, close out old issues in JIRA, etc --
> just the last bits documented on the wiki.
>
> Then we can all look at open issues again. On the one hand, the bad news is
> we have a bigger backlog than ever; there are clearly still problems
> getting worse there. But, a lot are easy to fix.
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Shannon Quinn<sq...@gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>> It's all ready to go; artifacts have been up for about 18 hours now. My
>> only reason for delay is Lance's note from last night regarding the failure
>> in Bayes' classification. Do we proceed regardless?
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
The release is already built, voted, pushed out. If anything we'd be
contemplating a "1.6.1" release, but this hardly sounds like a major issue.
I believe you proceed.
If all the artifacts are in place, make sure the web site is updated, send
the announcements to user@ and dev@, close out old issues in JIRA, etc --
just the last bits documented on the wiki.
Then we can all look at open issues again. On the one hand, the bad news is
we have a bigger backlog than ever; there are clearly still problems
getting worse there. But, a lot are easy to fix.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> It's all ready to go; artifacts have been up for about 18 hours now. My
> only reason for delay is Lance's note from last night regarding the failure
> in Bayes' classification. Do we proceed regardless?
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu>.
It's all ready to go; artifacts have been up for about 18 hours now. My
only reason for delay is Lance's note from last night regarding the
failure in Bayes' classification. Do we proceed regardless?
On 2/6/2012 8:58 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Do we have release notes and/or announcement?
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
>> +1 Checked out& built for me. Ran some tests locally.
>>
>> On 2/4/12 12:34 PM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>> I count 3 +1s so far; technically the 72 hour period is up as of today. If I don't hear any objections by the end of the day I'll move forward.
>>>
>>> On 2/3/2012 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>> +1 on releasing. Checked sigs. Ran examples locally. Ran tests.
>>>>
>>>> Man, that is a lot of artifacts. Do we really need bzip, gzip and zip?
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, here's what I use to get the artifacts locally: wget -l 10 -e robots=off --wait 1 --no-check-certificate -nd -np -r http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted it before doing release:perform)
>>>> --------------------------------------------
>>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> --------------------------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Do we have release notes and/or announcement?
On Feb 5, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> +1 Checked out & built for me. Ran some tests locally.
>
> On 2/4/12 12:34 PM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>> I count 3 +1s so far; technically the 72 hour period is up as of today. If I don't hear any objections by the end of the day I'll move forward.
>>
>> On 2/3/2012 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> +1 on releasing. Checked sigs. Ran examples locally. Ran tests.
>>>
>>> Man, that is a lot of artifacts. Do we really need bzip, gzip and zip?
>>>
>>> FWIW, here's what I use to get the artifacts locally: wget -l 10 -e robots=off --wait 1 --no-check-certificate -nd -np -r http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>>
>>>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>>
>>>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted it before doing release:perform)
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Jeff Eastman <jd...@windwardsolutions.com>.
+1 Checked out & built for me. Ran some tests locally.
On 2/4/12 12:34 PM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
> I count 3 +1s so far; technically the 72 hour period is up as of
> today. If I don't hear any objections by the end of the day I'll move
> forward.
>
> On 2/3/2012 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> +1 on releasing. Checked sigs. Ran examples locally. Ran tests.
>>
>> Man, that is a lot of artifacts. Do we really need bzip, gzip and zip?
>>
>> FWIW, here's what I use to get the artifacts locally: wget -l 10 -e
>> robots=off --wait 1 --no-check-certificate -nd -np -r
>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>>
>>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>>
>>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>>
>>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and
>>> deleted it before doing release:perform)
>> --------------------------------------------
>> Grant Ingersoll
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu>.
I count 3 +1s so far; technically the 72 hour period is up as of today.
If I don't hear any objections by the end of the day I'll move forward.
On 2/3/2012 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> +1 on releasing. Checked sigs. Ran examples locally. Ran tests.
>
> Man, that is a lot of artifacts. Do we really need bzip, gzip and zip?
>
> FWIW, here's what I use to get the artifacts locally: wget -l 10 -e robots=off --wait 1 --no-check-certificate -nd -np -r http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
>
>> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>>
>> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>>
>> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted it before doing release:perform)
> --------------------------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
+1 on releasing. Checked sigs. Ran examples locally. Ran tests.
Man, that is a lot of artifacts. Do we really need bzip, gzip and zip?
FWIW, here's what I use to get the artifacts locally: wget -l 10 -e robots=off --wait 1 --no-check-certificate -nd -np -r http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>
> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>
> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and deleted it before doing release:perform)
--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
On 02/01/2012 05:50 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote:
> RC for Mahout 0.6 is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-169/
>
> Vote is open for the usual 72 hours.
>
> (Sean was right: guess I added the -Xmx flag, ran the tests, and
> deleted it before doing release:perform)
Hi,
For those who want an easy way to install/test/remove this RC, there is
an updated Apache Bigtop (incubating) package available in the RC branch
for your favourite GNU/Linux distribution.
Packages available are:
* CentOS 5:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=centos5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* CentOS 6:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=centos6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* Fedora 15:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=fedora15/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* Fedora 16:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=fedora16/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
* Ubuntu Lucid:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=lucid/
* SLES 11:
http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Bigtop-RCs-Mahout/label=sles11/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/output/mahout/mahout-0.6.3-1.noarch.rpm
All of this is based on unreleased work and is only meant for testing
purpose.
Don't hesitate to let me know if you encounter any issue.
Thanks,
Bruno
Note: I am CCing mahout dev mailing list since there may be some folks
interested by this email