You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@solr.apache.org by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> on 2023/03/21 15:25:27 UTC

[VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0

The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea

You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:

python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea

You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using the
following command:

DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
  RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea && \
  docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
  --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
  -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24 16:00 UTC.

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Here is my +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
+1 (binding)

Ran smoketest and some manual tests. Also reviewed change log.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:55 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>
> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using the
> following command:
>
> DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
>   RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea &&
> \
>   docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
>   --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
>   -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24 16:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:

+1  9  (8 binding)
 0  0
-1  0

This vote has PASSED

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:01 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for participating Alejandro!
>
> 2) You need dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py to run the smoke tests.
>> I downloaded the solr src tgz from the artifacts folder, uncompress and
>> then ran the smoke test command.
>> Is this the correct way to do it?
>>
>
> Generally the strategy is checkout the release branch from the git
> repository (in this case branch_9_2), and then run the smoketester from
> there.
>
>  3) What is the correct/recommended way to handle the trusted chain for
>> this
>
> output.
>
> You can run the following command, which will download all of the trusted
> GPG keys from Solr Committers and import them into your local keystore.
>
> curl -sL0 "https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/solr/KEYS" | gpg
> --import
>
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> - Houston
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:54 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for voting, Alejandro.
>>
>> All votes count :)
>>
>> The binding votes from the PMCs are required for passing a release vote,
>> but all community votes are essential to ensure a stable build.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 8:38 PM Arrieta, Alejandro <
>> aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> >  1) Solr 9.2.0 RC1
>> >
>> > SUCCESS! [0:25:45.706109]
>> > virtualbox ubuntu 22.04 + ubuntu openjdk 11
>> >
>> > +0 don't know if my vote counts.
>> >
>> > 2) Solr operator test (Thanks Houston Putman for the command to run the
>> > solr operator tests)
>> >
>> > Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 286.376 seconds
>> > SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
>> >
>> > noob question warning ;-)
>> >
>> > 1) Do you need to be a Solr committer to have a valid vote?
>> >
>> > 2) You need dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py to run the smoke
>> tests.
>> > I downloaded the solr src tgz from the artifacts folder, uncompress and
>> > then ran the smoke test command.
>> > Is this the correct way to do it?
>> >
>> > 3) What is the correct/recommended way to handle the trusted chain for
>> this
>> > output.
>> >      verify trust
>> >       GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted
>> > signature!
>> >
>> >
>> > Kind Regards,
>> > Alejandro Arrieta
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:21 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowskija@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > > SUCCESS! [0:27:15.62963]
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:14 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes
>> and
>> > > CHANGES.
>> > > >
>> > > > SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]
>> > > >
>> > > > Only a few minors:
>> > > >
>> > > > * Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in
>> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1486
>> > > > * Duplicate CHANGES entries in 9.2 section:
>> > > >     * SOLR-15787: FileSystemConfigSetService: implement the
>> abstraction
>> > > completely.  It could be useful
>> > > >       for putting ConfigSets on a shared file system.  (Nazerke
>> Seidan,
>> > > David Smiley)
>> > > >     * SOLR-16665: The base docker image has been upgraded from
>> Ubuntu
>> > 20
>> > > (Focal) to Ubuntu 22 (Jammy). (Houston Putman)
>> > > >
>> > > > All in all good I believe, can fix the changes duplication if there
>> is
>> > a
>> > > re-spin.
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 (binding)
>> > > >
>> > > > Jan
>> > > >
>> > > > > 21. mar. 2023 kl. 16:25 skrev Houston Putman <houston@apache.org
>> >:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image
>> using
>> > > the
>> > > > > following command:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
>> > > > >
>> > RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>> > > && \
>> > > > >  docker build
>> $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
>> > > > >  --build-arg
>> > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
>> > > > >  -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24
>> > > 16:00 UTC.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [ ] +1  approve
>> > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Here is my +1
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Thanks for participating Alejandro!

2) You need dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py to run the smoke tests.
> I downloaded the solr src tgz from the artifacts folder, uncompress and
> then ran the smoke test command.
> Is this the correct way to do it?
>

Generally the strategy is checkout the release branch from the git
repository (in this case branch_9_2), and then run the smoketester from
there.

 3) What is the correct/recommended way to handle the trusted chain for this

output.

You can run the following command, which will download all of the trusted
GPG keys from Solr Committers and import them into your local keystore.

curl -sL0 "https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/solr/KEYS" | gpg
--import


Hope that helps!

- Houston

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:54 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:

> Thanks for voting, Alejandro.
>
> All votes count :)
>
> The binding votes from the PMCs are required for passing a release vote,
> but all community votes are essential to ensure a stable build.
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 8:38 PM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >  1) Solr 9.2.0 RC1
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:25:45.706109]
> > virtualbox ubuntu 22.04 + ubuntu openjdk 11
> >
> > +0 don't know if my vote counts.
> >
> > 2) Solr operator test (Thanks Houston Putman for the command to run the
> > solr operator tests)
> >
> > Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 286.376 seconds
> > SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
> >
> > noob question warning ;-)
> >
> > 1) Do you need to be a Solr committer to have a valid vote?
> >
> > 2) You need dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py to run the smoke tests.
> > I downloaded the solr src tgz from the artifacts folder, uncompress and
> > then ran the smoke test command.
> > Is this the correct way to do it?
> >
> > 3) What is the correct/recommended way to handle the trusted chain for
> this
> > output.
> >      verify trust
> >       GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted
> > signature!
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Alejandro Arrieta
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:21 AM Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > SUCCESS! [0:27:15.62963]
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:14 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes
> and
> > > CHANGES.
> > > >
> > > > SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]
> > > >
> > > > Only a few minors:
> > > >
> > > > * Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in
> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1486
> > > > * Duplicate CHANGES entries in 9.2 section:
> > > >     * SOLR-15787: FileSystemConfigSetService: implement the
> abstraction
> > > completely.  It could be useful
> > > >       for putting ConfigSets on a shared file system.  (Nazerke
> Seidan,
> > > David Smiley)
> > > >     * SOLR-16665: The base docker image has been upgraded from Ubuntu
> > 20
> > > (Focal) to Ubuntu 22 (Jammy). (Houston Putman)
> > > >
> > > > All in all good I believe, can fix the changes duplication if there
> is
> > a
> > > re-spin.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Jan
> > > >
> > > > > 21. mar. 2023 kl. 16:25 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > > > >
> > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > >
> > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > > > >
> > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image
> using
> > > the
> > > > > following command:
> > > > >
> > > > > DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
> > > > >
> > RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > > && \
> > > > >  docker build
> $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
> > > > >  --build-arg
> > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
> > > > >  -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24
> > > 16:00 UTC.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is my +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Thanks for voting, Alejandro.

All votes count :)

The binding votes from the PMCs are required for passing a release vote,
but all community votes are essential to ensure a stable build.

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 8:38 PM Arrieta, Alejandro <
aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:

>  1) Solr 9.2.0 RC1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:25:45.706109]
> virtualbox ubuntu 22.04 + ubuntu openjdk 11
>
> +0 don't know if my vote counts.
>
> 2) Solr operator test (Thanks Houston Putman for the command to run the
> solr operator tests)
>
> Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 286.376 seconds
> SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
>
> noob question warning ;-)
>
> 1) Do you need to be a Solr committer to have a valid vote?
>
> 2) You need dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py to run the smoke tests.
> I downloaded the solr src tgz from the artifacts folder, uncompress and
> then ran the smoke test command.
> Is this the correct way to do it?
>
> 3) What is the correct/recommended way to handle the trusted chain for this
> output.
>      verify trust
>       GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted
> signature!
>
>
> Kind Regards,
> Alejandro Arrieta
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:21 AM Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > SUCCESS! [0:27:15.62963]
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:14 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes and
> > CHANGES.
> > >
> > > SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]
> > >
> > > Only a few minors:
> > >
> > > * Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in
> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1486
> > > * Duplicate CHANGES entries in 9.2 section:
> > >     * SOLR-15787: FileSystemConfigSetService: implement the abstraction
> > completely.  It could be useful
> > >       for putting ConfigSets on a shared file system.  (Nazerke Seidan,
> > David Smiley)
> > >     * SOLR-16665: The base docker image has been upgraded from Ubuntu
> 20
> > (Focal) to Ubuntu 22 (Jammy). (Houston Putman)
> > >
> > > All in all good I believe, can fix the changes duplication if there is
> a
> > re-spin.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > 21. mar. 2023 kl. 16:25 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
> > > >
> > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > > >
> > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > >
> > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > > >
> > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using
> > the
> > > > following command:
> > > >
> > > > DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
> > > >
> RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > && \
> > > >  docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
> > > >  --build-arg
> > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
> > > >  -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24
> > 16:00 UTC.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Here is my +1
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by "Arrieta, Alejandro" <aa...@perrinsoftware.com>.
 1) Solr 9.2.0 RC1

SUCCESS! [0:25:45.706109]
virtualbox ubuntu 22.04 + ubuntu openjdk 11

+0 don't know if my vote counts.

2) Solr operator test (Thanks Houston Putman for the command to run the
solr operator tests)

Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 286.376 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped

noob question warning ;-)

1) Do you need to be a Solr committer to have a valid vote?

2) You need dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py to run the smoke tests.
I downloaded the solr src tgz from the artifacts folder, uncompress and
then ran the smoke test command.
Is this the correct way to do it?

3) What is the correct/recommended way to handle the trusted chain for this
output.
     verify trust
      GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!


Kind Regards,
Alejandro Arrieta

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:21 AM Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
> SUCCESS! [0:27:15.62963]
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:14 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes and
> CHANGES.
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]
> >
> > Only a few minors:
> >
> > * Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1486
> > * Duplicate CHANGES entries in 9.2 section:
> >     * SOLR-15787: FileSystemConfigSetService: implement the abstraction
> completely.  It could be useful
> >       for putting ConfigSets on a shared file system.  (Nazerke Seidan,
> David Smiley)
> >     * SOLR-16665: The base docker image has been upgraded from Ubuntu 20
> (Focal) to Ubuntu 22 (Jammy). (Houston Putman)
> >
> > All in all good I believe, can fix the changes duplication if there is a
> re-spin.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > > 21. mar. 2023 kl. 16:25 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
> > >
> > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > >
> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > >
> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > >
> > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using
> the
> > > following command:
> > >
> > > DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
> > >  RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> && \
> > >  docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
> > >  --build-arg
> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
> > >  -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24
> 16:00 UTC.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Here is my +1
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [0:27:15.62963]

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:14 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes and CHANGES.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]
>
> Only a few minors:
>
> * Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1486
> * Duplicate CHANGES entries in 9.2 section:
>     * SOLR-15787: FileSystemConfigSetService: implement the abstraction completely.  It could be useful
>       for putting ConfigSets on a shared file system.  (Nazerke Seidan, David Smiley)
>     * SOLR-16665: The base docker image has been upgraded from Ubuntu 20 (Focal) to Ubuntu 22 (Jammy). (Houston Putman)
>
> All in all good I believe, can fix the changes duplication if there is a re-spin.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Jan
>
> > 21. mar. 2023 kl. 16:25 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> >
> > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using the
> > following command:
> >
> > DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
> >  RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea && \
> >  docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
> >  --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
> >  -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24 16:00 UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.
Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes and CHANGES.

SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]

Only a few minors:

* Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1486
* Duplicate CHANGES entries in 9.2 section:
    * SOLR-15787: FileSystemConfigSetService: implement the abstraction completely.  It could be useful
      for putting ConfigSets on a shared file system.  (Nazerke Seidan, David Smiley)
    * SOLR-16665: The base docker image has been upgraded from Ubuntu 20 (Focal) to Ubuntu 22 (Jammy). (Houston Putman)

All in all good I believe, can fix the changes duplication if there is a re-spin.

+1 (binding)

Jan

> 21. mar. 2023 kl. 16:25 skrev Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>:
> 
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
> 
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> 
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> 
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> 
> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using the
> following command:
> 
> DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
>  RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea && \
>  docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
>  --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
>  -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24 16:00 UTC.
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Here is my +1


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:55:42.691297]


On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 11:25 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>
> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using the
> following command:
>
> DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \
>   RC_FOLDER=solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea && \
>   docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \
>   --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.2.0.tgz \
>   -t solr-rc:9.2.0-1
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-03-24 16:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:36:59.712195]

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 4:12 PM Kevin Risden <co...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:27:38.610576]
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 6:36 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I also built a test docker image (using the command above) and ran it
> with
> > the Solr Operator integration tests (check out the solr operator repo and
> > run "make e2e-tests SOLR_IMAGE="solr-rc:9.2.0-1").
> >
> > Got a success!
> >
> > Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 279.874 seconds
> > SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
> >
> >
> > Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 4m58.443616072s
> > Test Suite Passed
> >
> > I was having trouble with this.
> > >
> >
> > Can you make a JIRA/separate issue about this Shawn? I had my own issue
> > with the integration tests running very slowly that I'm going to split
> off
> > into a separate issue.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:53 PM Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/21/23 09:25, Houston Putman wrote:
> > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > >
> > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> > >
> > > +1 from me as I was eventually able to get a successful smoke test.
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I was having trouble with this.
> > >
> > > I discovered that it puts a lot of data into /tmp.  On my primary
> > > server, /tmp is a 4GB ramdisk (type tmpfs in Linux) as I mentioned on
> my
> > > wiki page.  Search for "four month" to find that info:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ShawnHeisey
> > >
> > > When I switched to a different system that has no separate /tmp mount,
> > > the smoke test passes every time.  On the system where it worked, I
> > > never saw the size of /tmp get above 2.9GB, but that was checking every
> > > 10 seconds, so maybe it got above that briefly, or failed to do
> > > something because it could see there wasn't enough space.
> > >
> > > I do not know whether the problem is available space in my /tmp ramdisk
> > > or maybe a problem doing hardlinks.  But it strikes me as a bad thing
> > > that the smoketester script uses /tmp for large data.  I tried another
> > > test on that second system where the git checkout was on a different
> > > filesystem than the root (where /tmp lives) and it still passed, so a
> > > hardlink problem does not seem likely.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I think the temporary directory for unpacking the release candidate and
> > > running tests should be created as a subdirectory of the source tree,
> > > not in /tmp.  And then everything except for the test log should be
> > > cleaned up afterwards whether the smoke test passes or fails.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Kevin Risden <co...@gmail.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:27:38.610576]

Kevin Risden


On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 6:36 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:

> I also built a test docker image (using the command above) and ran it with
> the Solr Operator integration tests (check out the solr operator repo and
> run "make e2e-tests SOLR_IMAGE="solr-rc:9.2.0-1").
>
> Got a success!
>
> Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 279.874 seconds
> SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
>
>
> Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 4m58.443616072s
> Test Suite Passed
>
> I was having trouble with this.
> >
>
> Can you make a JIRA/separate issue about this Shawn? I had my own issue
> with the integration tests running very slowly that I'm going to split off
> into a separate issue.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:53 PM Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
> > On 3/21/23 09:25, Houston Putman wrote:
> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > >
> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
> >
> > +1 from me as I was eventually able to get a successful smoke test.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >
> > I was having trouble with this.
> >
> > I discovered that it puts a lot of data into /tmp.  On my primary
> > server, /tmp is a 4GB ramdisk (type tmpfs in Linux) as I mentioned on my
> > wiki page.  Search for "four month" to find that info:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ShawnHeisey
> >
> > When I switched to a different system that has no separate /tmp mount,
> > the smoke test passes every time.  On the system where it worked, I
> > never saw the size of /tmp get above 2.9GB, but that was checking every
> > 10 seconds, so maybe it got above that briefly, or failed to do
> > something because it could see there wasn't enough space.
> >
> > I do not know whether the problem is available space in my /tmp ramdisk
> > or maybe a problem doing hardlinks.  But it strikes me as a bad thing
> > that the smoketester script uses /tmp for large data.  I tried another
> > test on that second system where the git checkout was on a different
> > filesystem than the root (where /tmp lives) and it still passed, so a
> > hardlink problem does not seem likely.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > I think the temporary directory for unpacking the release candidate and
> > running tests should be created as a subdirectory of the source tree,
> > not in /tmp.  And then everything except for the test log should be
> > cleaned up afterwards whether the smoke test passes or fails.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
I also built a test docker image (using the command above) and ran it with
the Solr Operator integration tests (check out the solr operator repo and
run "make e2e-tests SOLR_IMAGE="solr-rc:9.2.0-1").

Got a success!

Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 279.874 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped


Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 4m58.443616072s
Test Suite Passed

I was having trouble with this.
>

Can you make a JIRA/separate issue about this Shawn? I had my own issue
with the integration tests running very slowly that I'm going to split off
into a separate issue.

- Houston

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:53 PM Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 3/21/23 09:25, Houston Putman wrote:
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea
>
> +1 from me as I was eventually able to get a successful smoke test.
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> I was having trouble with this.
>
> I discovered that it puts a lot of data into /tmp.  On my primary
> server, /tmp is a 4GB ramdisk (type tmpfs in Linux) as I mentioned on my
> wiki page.  Search for "four month" to find that info:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ShawnHeisey
>
> When I switched to a different system that has no separate /tmp mount,
> the smoke test passes every time.  On the system where it worked, I
> never saw the size of /tmp get above 2.9GB, but that was checking every
> 10 seconds, so maybe it got above that briefly, or failed to do
> something because it could see there wasn't enough space.
>
> I do not know whether the problem is available space in my /tmp ramdisk
> or maybe a problem doing hardlinks.  But it strikes me as a bad thing
> that the smoketester script uses /tmp for large data.  I tried another
> test on that second system where the git checkout was on a different
> filesystem than the root (where /tmp lives) and it still passed, so a
> hardlink problem does not seem likely.
>
> ---
>
> I think the temporary directory for unpacking the release candidate and
> running tests should be created as a subdirectory of the source tree,
> not in /tmp.  And then everything except for the test log should be
> cleaned up afterwards whether the smoke test passes or fails.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.0 RC1

Posted by Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>.
On 3/21/23 09:25, Houston Putman wrote:
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> 
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c5515e2918c22513f7aa527d6c6db943150fea

+1 from me as I was eventually able to get a successful smoke test.

----------------------------------------

I was having trouble with this.

I discovered that it puts a lot of data into /tmp.  On my primary 
server, /tmp is a 4GB ramdisk (type tmpfs in Linux) as I mentioned on my 
wiki page.  Search for "four month" to find that info:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ShawnHeisey

When I switched to a different system that has no separate /tmp mount, 
the smoke test passes every time.  On the system where it worked, I 
never saw the size of /tmp get above 2.9GB, but that was checking every 
10 seconds, so maybe it got above that briefly, or failed to do 
something because it could see there wasn't enough space.

I do not know whether the problem is available space in my /tmp ramdisk 
or maybe a problem doing hardlinks.  But it strikes me as a bad thing 
that the smoketester script uses /tmp for large data.  I tried another 
test on that second system where the git checkout was on a different 
filesystem than the root (where /tmp lives) and it still passed, so a 
hardlink problem does not seem likely.

---

I think the temporary directory for unpacking the release candidate and 
running tests should be created as a subdirectory of the source tree, 
not in /tmp.  And then everything except for the test log should be 
cleaned up afterwards whether the smoke test passes or fails.

Thanks,
Shawn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org