[D] Is it worth considering binary JSON formats as well as plain JSON? [fory]

["pjfanning (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user pjfanning created a discussion: Is it worth considering binary JSON formats as well as plain JSON?

CBOR, MessagePack, Smile are examples.
If we support JSON, then supporting binary JSON gives a more performant option while it is a little less well supported by libs or frameworks than plain JSON. 

GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/fory/discussions/3954

----
This is an automatically sent email for commits@fory.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: commits-unsubscribe@fory.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@fory.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@fory.apache.org

Re: [D] Is it worth considering binary JSON formats as well as plain JSON? [fory]

["chaokunyang (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user chaokunyang added a comment to the discussion: Is it worth considering binary JSON formats as well as plain JSON?

BSON isn't used that widely, so I think we can hold off for now. Adding a high-performance implementation would require significant work and introduce additional maintenance overhead.

To reduce the work, we must introduce new abstraction which will have negative effect on performance.

GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/fory/discussions/3954#discussioncomment-18095750

----
This is an automatically sent email for commits@fory.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: commits-unsubscribe@fory.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@fory.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@fory.apache.org