You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lenya.apache.org by Jürgen Ragaller <ra...@apache.org> on 2007/11/15 16:12:18 UTC
cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Hi
The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11 release
can be read at:
http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-version-
dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
Jürgen
null-oder-eins GmbH Zürich
web & graphic design
www.null-oder-eins.ch
ragaller@apache.org
Skype: callto://ragaller
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Jörn Nettingsmeier <ne...@apache.org>.
solprovider@apache.org wrote:
>
> Cocoon-2.1.11 includes the fix for the HTTP Serializer correctly
> setting status codes. That fix is critical for properly working
> websites. Websites seem to be the primary use of our CMS so all
> releases of Lenya should include this fix. (I believe) Any official
> release should use only gold versions of dependencies, not dev
> versions. We should schedule the freeze for the next 2.0 RC to start
> a few days after Cocoon-2.1.11 is released.
-1
the old truism about "gold versions" does not really apply anymore in
today's software world.
especially since it has become hip to attach "-beta" to your flagship
web service to show how bleeding edge you are :-D
jokes aside, it would be great to have a cocoon release in time for 2.0.
but keep in mind it's a legacy for the cocoon crowd, so even if they
promise to, it's not really clear they will keep a release date. i know
i wouldn't touch lenya 1.2 unless i really had to.
and lenya 2.0 has been slipping for so long that it would be suicidal to
make ourselves depend on external factors for our release. this thing
needs to be out by christmas, or we might as well self-destruct now.
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by so...@apache.org.
On 11/16/07, Jürgen Ragaller <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
> Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
> > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> >> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
> >>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11
> >>> release can
> >>> be read at:
> >>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-
> >>> version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
> >>
> >> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
> >>
> >> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
> >
> > No.
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-
> > rc1.html?revision=595467
> >
> > That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
> >
> > We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
> >
>
> With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a svn-
> version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Jürgen
Cocoon-2.1.11 includes the fix for the HTTP Serializer correctly
setting status codes. That fix is critical for properly working
websites. Websites seem to be the primary use of our CMS so all
releases of Lenya should include this fix. (I believe) Any official
release should use only gold versions of dependencies, not dev
versions. We should schedule the freeze for the next 2.0 RC to start
a few days after Cocoon-2.1.11 is released.
For the same reason, we should plan to release Lenya-1.2.6 with
Cocoon-2.1.11 as soon as possible.
solprovider
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb:
> Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
>> Good morning
>>
>> Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>>> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11
>>>>> release can
>>>>> be read at:
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
>>>
>>> No.
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-rc1.html?revision=595467
>>>
>>>
>>> That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
>>>
>>> We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
>>>
>>
>> With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a
>> svn-version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense.
>
> +1
+1
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Jörn Nettingsmeier <ne...@apache.org>.
Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
> Good morning
>
> Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
>
>> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11 release
>>>> can
>>>> be read at:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
>>>
>>> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
>>
>> No.
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-rc1.html?revision=595467
>>
>>
>> That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
>>
>> We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
>>
>
> With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a
> svn-version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense.
+1
given that the cocoon crowd does not intend to work on 2.1 anymore
except for bugfixes, we can reasonably expect their final release to be
fully compatible with the revision we currently use. that means our
users can easily replace it by the release when it comes (if there are
any bugfixes that are worth the trouble).
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Jann Forrer <ja...@id.uzh.ch>.
Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
> Good morning
>
> Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
>
>> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11 release
>>>> can
>>>> be read at:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
>>>
>>> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
>>
>> No.
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-rc1.html?revision=595467
>>
>>
>> That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
>>
>> We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
>>
>
> With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a
> svn-version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense.
>
> WDYT?
>
+1
Jann
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Richard Frovarp <Ri...@sendit.nodak.edu>.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 09:27 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Thorsten Scherler schrieb:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>> Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend
>>> to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list).
>>>
>>> - latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0
>>>
>> +0
>>
>> Like Jörn already pointed out, it's been a while since 2.1.10 has been
>> released. And if we'll do another release with 2.1.11 soon, the gap (and
>> the risk of incompatibilities) between 2.1.10 and 2.1.11 will probably
>> be larger than from the current 2.1.11-dev to 2.1.11.
>>
>> OTOH, either approach is fine with me if it helps to get 2.0 out of the
>> door. And given that we'll release 2.0.1 with 2.1.11 soon, I could live
>> with minor issues. I don't think that anyone will finish a project with
>> 2.0 and has to go live until 2.0.1 is released.
>>
>
> Since Bob agreed to the suggestion of using HEAD of cocoon, I think we
> are fine to use a certain revision number for cocoon.
>
>
>>> - quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released
>>>
>> +1
>>
>> BTW, Thorsten - thanks again for organizing the release!
>>
>>
>
> You are very welcome, just trying the best I can, like everybody in this
> community. :)
>
> Thanks everybody for testing and coding.
>
> salu2
>
I know I'm late to the discussion. However, I would like to see us use a
'stable' release of Cocoon. I also want to get a release out the door.
If we can do a 2.0 release against a specific svn release of Cocoon,
then a quick 2.0.1 when 2.1.11 is released, that would work for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@juntadeandalucia.es>.
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 09:27 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler schrieb:
>
> [...]
>
> > Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend
> > to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list).
> >
> > - latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0
>
> +0
>
> Like Jörn already pointed out, it's been a while since 2.1.10 has been
> released. And if we'll do another release with 2.1.11 soon, the gap (and
> the risk of incompatibilities) between 2.1.10 and 2.1.11 will probably
> be larger than from the current 2.1.11-dev to 2.1.11.
>
> OTOH, either approach is fine with me if it helps to get 2.0 out of the
> door. And given that we'll release 2.0.1 with 2.1.11 soon, I could live
> with minor issues. I don't think that anyone will finish a project with
> 2.0 and has to go live until 2.0.1 is released.
Since Bob agreed to the suggestion of using HEAD of cocoon, I think we
are fine to use a certain revision number for cocoon.
> > - quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released
>
> +1
>
> BTW, Thorsten - thanks again for organizing the release!
>
You are very welcome, just trying the best I can, like everybody in this
community. :)
Thanks everybody for testing and coding.
salu2
> -- Andreas
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Thorsten Scherler schrieb:
[...]
> Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend
> to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list).
>
> - latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0
+0
Like Jörn already pointed out, it's been a while since 2.1.10 has been
released. And if we'll do another release with 2.1.11 soon, the gap (and
the risk of incompatibilities) between 2.1.10 and 2.1.11 will probably
be larger than from the current 2.1.11-dev to 2.1.11.
OTOH, either approach is fine with me if it helps to get 2.0 out of the
door. And given that we'll release 2.0.1 with 2.1.11 soon, I could live
with minor issues. I don't think that anyone will finish a project with
2.0 and has to go live until 2.0.1 is released.
> - instructions how to use a different version of cocooon (like trunk),
> which is very easy thanks to the build properties.
Just my CHF 0.02:
We should be careful not to make a statement like "We think the Cocoon
version we're shipping is OK, but if it isn't, just try another one."
Apart from that, it will probably be easier to support a community which
uses only one version of Cocoon. If problems are reported, we can still
decide if we have to provide this documentation.
> - quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released
+1
BTW, Thorsten - thanks again for organizing the release!
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 17, 2007 5:38 AM, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 16:01 -0500, Bob Harner wrote:
> ...
> > > Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself
> > > whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a
> > > certain version/revision number.
> > >
> > > Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would
> > > certainly slim down the release (~100mb!).
> > >
> > > Wdyt?
> >
> > IMHO for now I think we should stick to the original plan of including
> > the latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0. If
> > Cocoon 2.1.11 is actually released before Lenya 2.0 comes out, then
> > great, we can revisit the decision at that time. And if Lenya 2.0 is
> > released first, then we can certainly do a quick 2.0.1 release
> > immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released.
>
> We have a split situation ATM. Some of us want the trunk of cocoon and
> other a fixed release.
>
> I can understand both situations but we need to come to a consensus
> ASAP. My suggestion to not ship cocoon was an intention to overcome this
> split pot.
>
> However solprovider perfectly points out the pros and cons, thanks Paul.
> I see them more or less like him. The best would be to include just some
> jars that we need from cocoon and nothing more.
>
> Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend
> to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list).
>
> - latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0
> - instructions how to use a different version of cocooon (like trunk),
> which is very easy thanks to the build properties.
> - quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released
I'm glad Thorsen agrees with me, but I'm really in favor of whatever
gets a stable Lenya 2.0 out the door. I had previously argued maybe
18 months ago, that development should be based on a released version
of Cocoon, precisely so we wouldn't come to a difficult decision point
like this, but I lost that argument long ago to others who have
(deservedly) far more influence than me. I happily accept the
consensus of the group, though, so If Cocoon 2.1.10 is likely to be
less stable than 2.1.x then I think we should go with the latter. The
rest of you are more qualified than me to judge the risk in that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 16:01 -0500, Bob Harner wrote:
...
> > Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself
> > whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a
> > certain version/revision number.
> >
> > Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would
> > certainly slim down the release (~100mb!).
> >
> > Wdyt?
>
> IMHO for now I think we should stick to the original plan of including
> the latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0. If
> Cocoon 2.1.11 is actually released before Lenya 2.0 comes out, then
> great, we can revisit the decision at that time. And if Lenya 2.0 is
> released first, then we can certainly do a quick 2.0.1 release
> immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released.
We have a split situation ATM. Some of us want the trunk of cocoon and
other a fixed release.
I can understand both situations but we need to come to a consensus
ASAP. My suggestion to not ship cocoon was an intention to overcome this
split pot.
However solprovider perfectly points out the pros and cons, thanks Paul.
I see them more or less like him. The best would be to include just some
jars that we need from cocoon and nothing more.
Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend
to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list).
- latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0
- instructions how to use a different version of cocooon (like trunk),
which is very easy thanks to the build properties.
- quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released
WDYT?
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Jörn Nettingsmeier <ne...@apache.org>.
Bob Harner wrote:
> IMHO for now I think we should stick to the original plan of including
> the latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0. If
> Cocoon 2.1.11 is actually released before Lenya 2.0 comes out, then
> great, we can revisit the decision at that time. And if Lenya 2.0 is
> released first, then we can certainly do a quick 2.0.1 release
> immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released.
i'm not trying to bicker or anything (we've had that argument before),
and i respect your opinion, but are you aware of the fact that cocoon
2.1.10 was released december 19th, 2006? that means nobody in the lenya
community has used the code you want to include for *almost a year*, and
we are missing a ton of bugfixes, many of which are known to cause
issues with lenya?
sure, the world needs more conservative release management, but if we
use cocoon 2.1.10, this thing is going to explode in our faces. badly.
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 16, 2007 3:14 PM, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:07 +0100, Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
> > Good morning
> >
> > Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > >> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
> > >>> Hi
> > >>>
> > >>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11
> > >>> release can
> > >>> be read at:
> > >>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-
> > >>> version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
> > >>
> > >> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
> > >>
> > >> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
> > >
> > > No.
> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-
> > > rc1.html?revision=595467
> > >
> > > That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
> > >
> > > We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
> > >
> >
> > With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a svn-
> > version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> Yeah, I agree.
>
> Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself
> whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a
> certain version/revision number.
>
> Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would
> certainly slim down the release (~100mb!).
>
> Wdyt?
IMHO for now I think we should stick to the original plan of including
the latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0. If
Cocoon 2.1.11 is actually released before Lenya 2.0 comes out, then
great, we can revisit the decision at that time. And if Lenya 2.0 is
released first, then we can certainly do a quick 2.0.1 release
immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released.
>
> salu2
>
> >
> > Jürgen
> >
> >
> > null-oder-eins GmbH Zürich
> > web & graphic design
> >
> > www.null-oder-eins.ch
> >
> > ragaller@apache.org
> > Skype: callto://ragaller
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
> >
> --
> Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
> Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by so...@apache.org.
On 11/16/07, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:07 +0100, Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
> Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself
> whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a
> certain version/revision number.
>
> Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would
> certainly slim down the release (~100mb!).
>
> Wdyt?
> Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
A. Recommend certain version of Cocoon in the Installation
Instructions. Installers must build Cocoon before building Lenya.
PRO: Smaller download?
CONs:
1. Longer instructions.
2. Confuses people.
3. Potential bugs from unmatched versions.
B. Provide cocoon.jar with Lenya.
PROs:
1. Simpler build process.
2. Easier instructions.
3. Easier installation.
4. No duplicate libraries because Cocoon and Lenya provided different versions.
CON: Larger download?
My lenya/build/webapp/WEB-INF/lib has less than 50MB of JARs
(including the endorsed directory.) Cocoon-2.1.10-src.zip is 54MB.
People wanting Lenya would have less to download if Lenya included the
cocoon JARs.
WDYT?
solprovider
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Jörn Nettingsmeier <ne...@apache.org>.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself
> whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a
> certain version/revision number.
>
> Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would
> certainly slim down the release (~100mb!).
not a problem nowadays. our users are prospective server operators, so
bandwidth should not be an issue. if anyone can demonstrate that 100
megs of download is too much for them, i'll happily prepare a stack of
3½" floppies and mail them out. or maybe fax-on-demand? ;)
sure it would be nice to separate lenya from cocoon some way, but i fear
cocoon is really hard to install from scratch when you need to put a
third party package into it (i once tried it to deploy eXist inside it,
and failed horribly). so i think our integration is really a huge
benefit, and lowers the entrance barrier significantly. people are
downloading 90 megs of openoffice without blinking, and here we are
talking about a heavyweight server application.
while we're talking about distribution, did i say before i see no real
reason to provide binaries? imho, users should compile the stuff
themselves.
imho we should also encourage users to track svn (the 2.0 branch) rather
than download packages. others have brought forth convincing arguments
that packages are a must, and i agree.
but i think serious users should prefer svn for easier deployment of
bugfixes and patches (and a way to safely downgrade if necessary), and
we should mention that in our release notes. wdyt?
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:07 +0100, Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
> Good morning
>
> Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> >> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11
> >>> release can
> >>> be read at:
> >>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-
> >>> version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
> >>
> >> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
> >>
> >> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
> >
> > No.
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-
> > rc1.html?revision=595467
> >
> > That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
> >
> > We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
> >
>
> With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a svn-
> version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense.
>
> WDYT?
Yeah, I agree.
Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself
whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a
certain version/revision number.
Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would
certainly slim down the release (~100mb!).
Wdyt?
salu2
>
> Jürgen
>
>
> null-oder-eins GmbH Zürich
> web & graphic design
>
> www.null-oder-eins.ch
>
> ragaller@apache.org
> Skype: callto://ragaller
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Jürgen Ragaller <ra...@apache.org>.
Good morning
Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11
>>> release can
>>> be read at:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-
>>> version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
>>
>> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
>>
>> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
>
> No.
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-
> rc1.html?revision=595467
>
> That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
>
> We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
>
With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a svn-
version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense.
WDYT?
Jürgen
null-oder-eins GmbH Zürich
web & graphic design
www.null-oder-eins.ch
ragaller@apache.org
Skype: callto://ragaller
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
> > Hi
> >
> > The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11 release can
> > be read at:
> > http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
>
> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
>
> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
No.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc-rc1.html?revision=595467
That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. #
We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC).
salu2
>
> -- Andreas
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
>
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org
Re: cocoon-version for a 2.0-release
Posted by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org>.
Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
> Hi
>
> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11 release can
> be read at:
> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon-version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html
A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0.
Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1?
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org