You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> on 2006/03/23 08:08:46 UTC
[VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
After correcting packaging problems with the Shale 1.0.1 test build,
and following the release plan which is available on the Wiki,
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102
the Struts Shale v1.0.2 test build has been completed and deployed to
http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/
including checksums and signatures, which may be verified against
http://www.apache.org/dist/struts/KEYS .
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
of Struts PMC members are binding.
My vote is for Alpha quality, due to Shale's dependence on a snapshot
of Standalone Tiles.
--
Wendy Smoak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 3/22/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After correcting packaging problems with the Shale 1.0.1 test build,
> and following the release plan which is available on the Wiki,
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102
>
> the Struts Shale v1.0.2 test build has been completed and deployed to
>
> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/
>
> including checksums and signatures, which may be verified against
> http://www.apache.org/dist/struts/KEYS .
>
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [X] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
Tested all the apps. Tested rebuilding from source and redeploying. Looks
good -- thanks for all the work Wendy.
Craig
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 3/27/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 3/27/06, Niall Pemberton <ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly
> > for
> > the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but
> > also
> > because of the way Commons Validator has been implemented. It appears that
> > the implementation was done based on an old version of validator where the
> > javascript was embedded in the XML config file. This means that 1)
> > maintenance of that javascript is the responsibility of Shale and 2)
> > upgrading to later versions of validator (such as the 1.3.0 version just
> > released) won't pick up bugfixes in the javascript as users would expect.
> > Is
> > there any objection to changing Shale to use the javascript from Commons
> > Validator?
>
>
> +1 ... could you file an RFE so we can implement this and track it for the
> release notes on the next version?
OK Done:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121
I'll try to get round to doing this in the next week or two, unless
someone beats me to it.
Niall
> (I also plan on reviewing the other dependencies ... for example, MyFaces
> should be shipping 1.1.2 any day now, and it has a fix for the bug that
> prevents SQL Browser from actually displaying data.)
>
> Niall
>
>
> Craig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:13 AM
> >
> >
> > The vote results are as follows:
> >
> > Binding PMC Member votes:
> > Wendy Smoak - Alpha
> > Gary VanMatre - Alpha
> > Craig McClanahan - Alpha
> >
> > Non-binding:
> > Sean Schofield - Alpha
> >
> > Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality.
> >
> > Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for Shale
> > 1.0.0, and it isn't in www.apache.org/dist/struts. What would you
> > like to see happen with this one?
> >
> > At this point, my only distribution plans are to put the test
> > framework jar on ibiblio (via www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository) so
> > that MyFaces can use it for their release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 3/27/06, Niall Pemberton <ni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly
> for
> the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but
> also
> because of the way Commons Validator has been implemented. It appears that
> the implementation was done based on an old version of validator where the
> javascript was embedded in the XML config file. This means that 1)
> maintenance of that javascript is the responsibility of Shale and 2)
> upgrading to later versions of validator (such as the 1.3.0 version just
> released) won't pick up bugfixes in the javascript as users would expect.
> Is
> there any objection to changing Shale to use the javascript from Commons
> Validator?
+1 ... could you file an RFE so we can implement this and track it for the
release notes on the next version?
(I also plan on reviewing the other dependencies ... for example, MyFaces
should be shipping 1.1.2 any day now, and it has a fix for the bug that
prevents SQL Browser from actually displaying data.)
Niall
Craig
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:13 AM
>
>
> The vote results are as follows:
>
> Binding PMC Member votes:
> Wendy Smoak - Alpha
> Gary VanMatre - Alpha
> Craig McClanahan - Alpha
>
> Non-binding:
> Sean Schofield - Alpha
>
> Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality.
>
> Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for Shale
> 1.0.0, and it isn't in www.apache.org/dist/struts. What would you
> like to see happen with this one?
>
> At this point, my only distribution plans are to put the test
> framework jar on ibiblio (via www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository) so
> that MyFaces can use it for their release.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Wendy
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly for
the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but also
because of the way Commons Validator has been implemented. It appears that
the implementation was done based on an old version of validator where the
javascript was embedded in the XML config file. This means that 1)
maintenance of that javascript is the responsibility of Shale and 2)
upgrading to later versions of validator (such as the 1.3.0 version just
released) won't pick up bugfixes in the javascript as users would expect. Is
there any objection to changing Shale to use the javascript from Commons
Validator?
Niall
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wendy Smoak" <ws...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:13 AM
The vote results are as follows:
Binding PMC Member votes:
Wendy Smoak - Alpha
Gary VanMatre - Alpha
Craig McClanahan - Alpha
Non-binding:
Sean Schofield - Alpha
Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality.
Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for Shale
1.0.0, and it isn't in www.apache.org/dist/struts. What would you
like to see happen with this one?
At this point, my only distribution plans are to put the test
framework jar on ibiblio (via www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository) so
that MyFaces can use it for their release.
Thanks,
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Alpha and beta releases on ibiblio (for maven purposes) works for me.
Final releases on the ASF mirror network.
Sean
On 3/28/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 3/27/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/26/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > It was implicitly evident on the dev list, but not announced on the user
> > > list because that was my understanding of non-GA releases at the time.
> > > Subsequently, I believe we determined that we'd announce the vote
> > results
> > > for any quality level on the user list too. That's what I'd like to
> > see,
> > > unless one of the other committers thinks I'm not remembering things
> > > correctly.
> > ...
> > > +1 ... and the MyFaces lists would probably make a reasonable cc on the
> > > announcement mail, since they are JSF -interested folks.
> > >
> > > We also need to update the web site to have appropriate links ... can
> > you do
> > > that too, please?
> >
> > After some consideration, I decided to update
> > http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html
> > to link to http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/ .
> >
> > That seems to fit with the docs here:
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html in that an Alpha release is
> > 'not ready for prime time.'
>
>
>
> Any other interpretations?
>
>
> +1 ... it should definitely not go out on the mirrors network until we do a
> GA release.
>
> --
> > Wendy
>
>
> Craig
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 3/27/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/26/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > It was implicitly evident on the dev list, but not announced on the user
> > list because that was my understanding of non-GA releases at the time.
> > Subsequently, I believe we determined that we'd announce the vote
> results
> > for any quality level on the user list too. That's what I'd like to
> see,
> > unless one of the other committers thinks I'm not remembering things
> > correctly.
> ...
> > +1 ... and the MyFaces lists would probably make a reasonable cc on the
> > announcement mail, since they are JSF -interested folks.
> >
> > We also need to update the web site to have appropriate links ... can
> you do
> > that too, please?
>
> After some consideration, I decided to update
> http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html
> to link to http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/ .
>
> That seems to fit with the docs here:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html in that an Alpha release is
> 'not ready for prime time.'
Any other interpretations?
+1 ... it should definitely not go out on the mirrors network until we do a
GA release.
--
> Wendy
Craig
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 3/26/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> It was implicitly evident on the dev list, but not announced on the user
> list because that was my understanding of non-GA releases at the time.
> Subsequently, I believe we determined that we'd announce the vote results
> for any quality level on the user list too. That's what I'd like to see,
> unless one of the other committers thinks I'm not remembering things
> correctly.
...
> +1 ... and the MyFaces lists would probably make a reasonable cc on the
> announcement mail, since they are JSF -interested folks.
>
> We also need to update the web site to have appropriate links ... can you do
> that too, please?
After some consideration, I decided to update
http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html
to link to http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/ .
That seems to fit with the docs here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html in that an Alpha release is
'not ready for prime time.'
Any other interpretations?
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 3/26/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The vote results are as follows:
>
> Binding PMC Member votes:
> Wendy Smoak - Alpha
> Gary VanMatre - Alpha
> Craig McClanahan - Alpha
>
> Non-binding:
> Sean Schofield - Alpha
>
> Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality.
>
> Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for Shale
> 1.0.0, and it isn't in www.apache.org/dist/struts . What would you
> like to see happen with this one?
It was implicitly evident on the dev list, but not announced on the user
list because that was my understanding of non-GA releases at the time.
Subsequently, I believe we determined that we'd announce the vote results
for any quality level on the user list too. That's what I'd like to see,
unless one of the other committers thinks I'm not remembering things
correctly.
At this point, my only distribution plans are to put the test
> framework jar on ibiblio (via www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository) so
> that MyFaces can use it for their release.
+1 ... and the MyFaces lists would probably make a reasonable cc on the
announcement mail, since they are JSF -interested folks.
We also need to update the web site to have appropriate links ... can you do
that too, please?
Thanks,
> --
> Wendy
Craig
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
The vote results are as follows:
Binding PMC Member votes:
Wendy Smoak - Alpha
Gary VanMatre - Alpha
Craig McClanahan - Alpha
Non-binding:
Sean Schofield - Alpha
Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality.
Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for Shale
1.0.0, and it isn't in www.apache.org/dist/struts. What would you
like to see happen with this one?
At this point, my only distribution plans are to put the test
framework jar on ibiblio (via www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository) so
that MyFaces can use it for their release.
Thanks,
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org