1.0.x Removed From Website

["David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>]

I have just removed 1.0.x details from the main website.  I've done this 
because 1.0.x series has not been active for some time and our website 
should encourage people to utilize 1.1 instead.  I've updated the faq to 
includes some information on 1.0.x vs 1.1.0 and future versions.

I'm personally in favor of closing all of the open 1.0.x bugs as won't 
fix and moving foward with 1.0.x in our rear view mirror, but I'll wait 
to take that action until others chime in.  The fact is, I can't 
remember the last time someone committed something to 1.0.x branch and I 
doubt it will happen anytime soon.

David

Re: 1.0.x Removed From Website

[CD...@hannaford.com]

Hi David,

That's fine with me. I just was going to suggest that you add the fact 
that 1.0.1 has been 'archived' to the 1.1.0 release announcement, but I'm 
too late with that suggestion :).

Is all the 1.1 documentation up to date including the build instructions? 
I know that you have changed the build a lot lately.

Thanks for all your hard work on the 1.1 release.
/Craig




"David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> 
02/28/2007 07:47 AM
Please respond to
pluto-dev@portals.apache.org


To
pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
cc

Subject
1.0.x Removed From Website






I have just removed 1.0.x details from the main website.  I've done this 
because 1.0.x series has not been active for some time and our website 
should encourage people to utilize 1.1 instead.  I've updated the faq to 
includes some information on 1.0.x vs 1.1.0 and future versions.

I'm personally in favor of closing all of the open 1.0.x bugs as won't 
fix and moving foward with 1.0.x in our rear view mirror, but I'll wait 
to take that action until others chime in.  The fact is, I can't 
remember the last time someone committed something to 1.0.x branch and I 
doubt it will happen anytime soon.

David