You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/10 22:07:36 UTC
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Hi,
We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
> if they would be interested.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> -- dims
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 from me Bryant.
>>
>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>>
>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>
>> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>>
>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>>
>> Please respond to
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> To
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>
>> -- dims
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>> > (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>> > contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
>> > repository that's Apache licensed.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
+1 to the sandbox. Thanks Bryant.
We should probably go ahead and create a separate part of the tree and stub
out some of the 1.1 interfaces/changes as well.
-Nick
Bryant Luk
<bryant.luk@gmail
.com> To
dev@cxf.apache.org
02/11/2010 09:08 cc
AM wink-dev@incubator.apache.org, Rick
McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
Subject
Please respond to Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API
wink-dev@incubato JAR
r.apache.org
I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just
interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my
initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that
can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
>> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
>> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
>> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>>
>> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
>> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory
in:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/
> and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its
> "ready".
>
> The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec
jar
> was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it
was
> more or less ready.
>
> THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using
the in-
> jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs
> obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd
and
> we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To
> switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be
addressed
> as well.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>> >> if they would be interested.
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me.
>> >>
>> >> -- dims
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>> >>
>> >> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >>> +1 from me Bryant.
>> >>>
>> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
>> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical
teams/communities.
>> >>>
>> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Nick
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the
JSR
>> >>> spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>> >>>
>> >>> Please respond to
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>> To
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> cc
>> >>>
>> >>> Subject
>> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> -- dims
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the
Maven
>> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
+1 to the sandbox. Thanks Bryant.
We should probably go ahead and create a separate part of the tree and stub
out some of the 1.1 interfaces/changes as well.
-Nick
Bryant Luk
<bryant.luk@gmail
.com> To
dev@cxf.apache.org
02/11/2010 09:08 cc
AM wink-dev@incubator.apache.org, Rick
McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
Subject
Please respond to Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API
wink-dev@incubato JAR
r.apache.org
I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just
interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my
initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that
can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
>> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
>> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
>> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>>
>> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
>> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory
in:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/
> and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its
> "ready".
>
> The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec
jar
> was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it
was
> more or less ready.
>
> THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using
the in-
> jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs
> obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd
and
> we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To
> switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be
addressed
> as well.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>> >> if they would be interested.
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me.
>> >>
>> >> -- dims
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>> >>
>> >> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >>> +1 from me Bryant.
>> >>>
>> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
>> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical
teams/communities.
>> >>>
>> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Nick
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the
JSR
>> >>> spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>> >>>
>> >>> Please respond to
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>> To
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> cc
>> >>>
>> >>> Subject
>> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> -- dims
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the
Maven
>> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 11, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just
> interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my
> initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that
> can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox.
Sounds good. FYI -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
Feel free to comment on the JIRA or drop a note to dev@geronimo.
--kevan
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just
interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my
initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that
can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
>> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
>> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
>> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>>
>> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
>> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/
> and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its
> "ready".
>
> The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar
> was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was
> more or less ready.
>
> THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in-
> jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs
> obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and
> we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To
> switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed
> as well.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>> >> if they would be interested.
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me.
>> >>
>> >> -- dims
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>> >>
>> >> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >>> +1 from me Bryant.
>> >>>
>> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
>> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>> >>>
>> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Nick
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
>> >>> spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>> >>>
>> >>> Please respond to
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>> To
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> cc
>> >>>
>> >>> Subject
>> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> -- dims
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
>> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just
interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my
initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that
can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
>> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
>> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
>> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>>
>> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
>> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/
> and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its
> "ready".
>
> The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar
> was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was
> more or less ready.
>
> THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in-
> jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs
> obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and
> we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To
> switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed
> as well.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>> >> if they would be interested.
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me.
>> >>
>> >> -- dims
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>> >>
>> >> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >>> +1 from me Bryant.
>> >>>
>> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
>> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>> >>>
>> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Nick
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
>> >>> spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>> >>>
>> >>> Please respond to
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>> To
>> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> cc
>> >>>
>> >>> Subject
>> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>> >>>
>> >>> -- dims
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
>> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>
> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>
> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/
and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its
"ready".
The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar
was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was
more or less ready.
THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in-
jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs
obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and
we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To
switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed
as well.
Dan
>
> Rick
>
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
> >> if they would be interested.
> >>
> >> +1 from me.
> >>
> >> -- dims
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
> >>
> >> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>> +1 from me Bryant.
> >>>
> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
> >>>
> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
> >>>
> >>> -Nick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
> >>> spec from geronimo? :)
> >>>
> >>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
> >>>
> >>> Please respond to
> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> To
> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> cc
> >>>
> >>> Subject
> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
> >>>
> >>> -- dims
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>
> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>
> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/
and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its
"ready".
The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar
was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was
more or less ready.
THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in-
jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs
obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and
we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To
switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed
as well.
Dan
>
> Rick
>
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
> >> if they would be interested.
> >>
> >> +1 from me.
> >>
> >> -- dims
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
> >>
> >> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>> +1 from me Bryant.
> >>>
> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
> >>>
> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
> >>>
> >>> -Nick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
> >>> spec from geronimo? :)
> >>>
> >>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
> >>>
> >>> Please respond to
> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> To
> >>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> cc
> >>>
> >>> Subject
> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
> >>>
> >>> -- dims
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Eoghan,
That's still not Apache licensed. It's just the Sun jar/code repackaged
with OSGi stuff. The only thing Apache licensed in there is the new
FactoryFinder.
If SMX is calling the resulting jars Apache licensed, that's a REAL concern.
They aren't.
Dan
On Thu February 11 2010 8:47:59 am Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec?
>
> Code here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/
>
> Artefacts here:
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servic
> emix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servi
> cemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/
>
> These are Apache licensed.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
> >> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
> >> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
> >> licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
> >> spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
> >> using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
> >> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
> >> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
> >> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
> >
> > Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't
> > happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this
> > support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
> >
> > If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
> > attach a patch to that Jira issue.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
> >>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
> >>> if they would be interested.
> >>>
> >>> +1 from me.
> >>>
> >>> -- dims
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
> >>>
> >>> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>> +1 from me Bryant.
> >>>>
> >>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
> >>>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming
> >>>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
> >>>>
> >>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Nick
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
> >>>> spec from geronimo? :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
> >>>>
> >>>> Please respond to
> >>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> To
> >>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> cc
> >>>>
> >>>> Subject
> >>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
> >>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
> >>>>
> >>>> -- dims
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
> >>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
> >>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the
> >>>>> Maven repository that's Apache licensed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@progress.com>.
Hi Eoghan,
the resulting artifact has an OSGI Locator embedded. This may not be that bad in itself, but it includes some extra bits which
non-OSGI consumers won't need and as briefly discussed on the Jersey list, it will 'force' all OSGI users which will depend on it to
rely on a specific solution (which is good but it is a specific one nonetheless) to do with the use of the OsgiLocator...
cheers, Sergey
Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec?
Code here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/
Artefacts here:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/
These are Apache licensed.
Cheers,
Eoghan
On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
>> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>>
>
> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't
> happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this support
> yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>
> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>>> if they would be interested.
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>> -- dims
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>>> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> +1 from me Bryant.
>>>>
>>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>>>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've
>>>> been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>>>>
>>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>>>>
>>>> -Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
>>>> spec from geronimo? :)
>>>>
>>>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>>>>
>>>> Please respond to
>>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> To
>>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> cc
>>>>
>>>> Subject
>>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>>>
>>>> -- dims
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
>>>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>.
Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec?
Code here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/
Artefacts here:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/
These are Apache licensed.
Cheers,
Eoghan
On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
>> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>>
>
> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't
> happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this support
> yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>
> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>>> if they would be interested.
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>> -- dims
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>>> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> +1 from me Bryant.
>>>>
>>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>>>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've
>>>> been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>>>>
>>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>>>>
>>>> -Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
>>>> spec from geronimo? :)
>>>>
>>>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>>>>
>>>> Please respond to
>>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> To
>>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> cc
>>>>
>>>> Subject
>>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>>>
>>>> -- dims
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
>>>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
> licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
> spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
> using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact
> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>
Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just
hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating
this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
attach a patch to that Jira issue.
Rick
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>> if they would be interested.
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> -- dims
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>> <nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me Bryant.
>>>
>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>>>
>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>>>
>>> -Nick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>>
>>> Davanum Srinivas<da...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>>>
>>> Please respond to
>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> To
>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> cc
>>>
>>> Subject
>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>>
>>> -- dims
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider
>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven
>>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>