You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by ap...@gmail.com on 2020/04/13 20:25:35 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Hi,
This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?', at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
- SHA and signed packages are correct
- NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
- That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes successfully
- That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
Maven artifacts are staged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
Please vote to approve this release:
+1 Approve the release
-1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
The vote passes if there is:
- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
- More positive votes than negative votes
Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR version you tested with.
For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
1) create an empty folder,
2) download into that folder this file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
3) run the script:
ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages and build results are always encouraged.
Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread.
Thanks,
Yishay Weiss
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Once the build tools is successfully deployed to Maven Central, then in the royale-compiler release/0.9.7 branch, the main pom.xml needs to be modified to use 1.2.0 version of build-tools.
On 4/19/20, 7:50 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I’m not sure I understand the question. As I understand it, the compiler will be built using the latest sources under compiler-build-tools. There are no recent code changes there as far as I can tell. I may be missing something.
From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:10 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Ok Yishay,
and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
thanks
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> Hi
>
> can we consider this vote finished?
>
> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
> fixes will be not applied
>
> Maybe I'm wrong
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2Fcompiler-build-tools%2F1.2.0%2Frc3%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C503d4ea9322f40ea93e608d7e470f763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229046151047604&sdata=w8lhK2Pjthl0iXa%2FuQUXkfz95PM9BIs2t7wP4sDahcg%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
> > on approving a release?', at:
> > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C503d4ea9322f40ea93e608d7e470f763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229046151057597&sdata=Uew%2BUT1HvaXMFXCYcJL9H2jbIAAIraG0ydVbZ2TE92Q%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> > successfully
> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> > >
> > > The KEYS file is at
> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2FKEYS&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C503d4ea9322f40ea93e608d7e470f763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229046151057597&sdata=wabwAgbmweHTbpfsYefeS0Pi38JScqsbL1oZF5gop4I%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapacheroyale-1064&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C503d4ea9322f40ea93e608d7e470f763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229046151057597&sdata=LJMIfPqQb53rR3LdPbDLcUmz5yVViqVihzpaJ7SivCM%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > > +1 Approve the release
> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> > >
> > > The vote passes if there is:
> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> > >
> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
> RC,
> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> that
> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> votes
> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> > >
> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> > version you tested with.
> > >
> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2Fcompiler-build-tools%2F1.2.0%2Frc3%2FApproveBuildTools.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C503d4ea9322f40ea93e608d7e470f763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229046151057597&sdata=rvQAGaNxgQE%2FD%2BJmvoIQM%2FKaIyAZWfDWqeTfsTDOdnE%3D&reserved=0
> > > 3) run the script:
> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> > >
> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> > >
> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> > not this VOTE thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yishay Weiss
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C503d4ea9322f40ea93e608d7e470f763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229046151057597&sdata=MW034Qi9WXVpg0KBCMCsAZ89NGsnGfoW%2BVsi6jRCy8E%3D&reserved=0
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C503d4ea9322f40ea93e608d7e470f763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229046151057597&sdata=MW034Qi9WXVpg0KBCMCsAZ89NGsnGfoW%2BVsi6jRCy8E%3D&reserved=0
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
I’m not sure I understand the question. As I understand it, the compiler will be built using the latest sources under compiler-build-tools. There are no recent code changes there as far as I can tell. I may be missing something.
From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:10 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Ok Yishay,
and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
thanks
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> Hi
>
> can we consider this vote finished?
>
> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
> fixes will be not applied
>
> Maybe I'm wrong
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> > >
> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
> > on approving a release?', at:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > >
> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> > successfully
> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> > >
> > > The KEYS file is at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> > >
> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > > +1 Approve the release
> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> > >
> > > The vote passes if there is:
> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> > >
> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
> RC,
> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> that
> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> votes
> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> > >
> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> > version you tested with.
> > >
> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > > 3) run the script:
> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> > >
> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> > >
> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> > not this VOTE thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yishay Weiss
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Yishay,
Good example is also an application. When you have Royale application and
wanted you to build it by ANT and Maven on a completely clean PC, fresh
windows installation.
In case of ANT you need to download Apache Royale SDK and point to it in
your script.
In case of Maven you need to tell where ARTIFACTS are (in Maven
settings.xml) and type "mvn package" in console - this will download and
build everything what is needed for application.
Thanks,
Piotr
pon., 20 kwi 2020 o 09:03 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
napisał(a):
> ok Yishay,
>
> now I see it in central :)
>
> about your question on why we should use 1.2.0. Maven has build tools as an
> artifact, so using 1.1.0 will make people using the old source code no
> matter what you have in source. That is one of the features of Maven that
> all artifacts and its versions are officially stored in a central repo so
> all people knows that they are using the right bits. If you build with Ant,
> that will work since Ant just build from the sources you have and does not
> have a concept of dependencies coming from a trusted source.
>
> In this particular case the fix introduced in 1.2.0 was to make
> reproducible builds working (or at least is needed for that, since that is
> still to be checked if that works), along other fixes in compiler.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > Turns out my public key needed to be distributed to a keyserver.
> >
> >
> >
> > gpg --keyserver http://keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-keys <fingerprint>
> >
> >
> >
> > did the trick. You should see it now.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
> > *Sent:* Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:22:56 PM
> > *To:* dev@royale.apache.org <de...@royale.apache.org>
> > *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on
> > releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the
> folder.
> > I’ll see if I can figure this out…
> >
> > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> > <ca...@apache.org>>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
> > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> > <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >
> > I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
> >
> >
> >
> https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
> >
> > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrovira@apache.org
> > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Ok Yishay,
> > >
> > > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<
> yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > >> Hi Carlos,
> > >>
> > >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
> > >>
> > >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> > <ca...@apache.org>>
> > >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> > >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> > <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> > >>
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> can we consider this vote finished?
> > >>
> > >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so
> the
> > >> fixes will be not applied
> > >>
> > >> Maybe I'm wrong
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> > >> escribió:
> > >>
> > >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours
> are
> > >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> > Harbs
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler
> > Build
> > >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
> > requirements
> > >> > on approving a release?', at:
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package
> > completes
> > >> > successfully
> > >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The KEYS file is at
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > >> > >
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >> > > +1 Approve the release
> > >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to
> why)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be
> called.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The vote passes if there is:
> > >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there
> will
> > be
> > >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in
> > the
> > >> RC,
> > >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
> functionality
> > >> that
> > >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not
> in
> > >> PMC
> > >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> > >> votes
> > >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and
> > AIR
> > >> > version you tested with.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the
> > common
> > >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading
> the
> > >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > >> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> > >> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > >> > > 3) run the script:
> > >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> > >> > >
> > >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> > >> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION
> > thread
> > >> > not this VOTE thread.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > > Yishay Weiss
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Carlos Rovira
> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> > *From: *Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
> > *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:23 PM
> > *To: *dev@royale.apache.org
> > *Subject: *RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on
> > releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the
> folder.
> > I’ll see if I can figure this out…
> >
> > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> > <ca...@apache.org>>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
> > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> > <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >
> > I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
> >
> >
> >
> https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
> >
> > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrovira@apache.org
> > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Ok Yishay,
> > >
> > > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<
> yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > >> Hi Carlos,
> > >>
> > >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
> > >>
> > >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> > <ca...@apache.org>>
> > >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> > >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> > <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> > >>
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> can we consider this vote finished?
> > >>
> > >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so
> the
> > >> fixes will be not applied
> > >>
> > >> Maybe I'm wrong
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> > >> escribió:
> > >>
> > >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours
> are
> > >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> > Harbs
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler
> > Build
> > >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
> > requirements
> > >> > on approving a release?', at:
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package
> > completes
> > >> > successfully
> > >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The KEYS file is at
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > >> > >
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >> > > +1 Approve the release
> > >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to
> why)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be
> called.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The vote passes if there is:
> > >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there
> will
> > be
> > >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in
> > the
> > >> RC,
> > >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
> functionality
> > >> that
> > >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not
> in
> > >> PMC
> > >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> > >> votes
> > >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and
> > AIR
> > >> > version you tested with.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the
> > common
> > >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading
> the
> > >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > >> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> > >> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > >> > > 3) run the script:
> > >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> > >> > >
> > >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> > >> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION
> > thread
> > >> > not this VOTE thread.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > > Yishay Weiss
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Carlos Rovira
> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks for explaining.
________________________________
From: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 9:55:13 AM
To: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
ok Yishay,
now I see it in central :)
about your question on why we should use 1.2.0. Maven has build tools as an
artifact, so using 1.1.0 will make people using the old source code no
matter what you have in source. That is one of the features of Maven that
all artifacts and its versions are officially stored in a central repo so
all people knows that they are using the right bits. If you build with Ant,
that will work since Ant just build from the sources you have and does not
have a concept of dependencies coming from a trusted source.
In this particular case the fix introduced in 1.2.0 was to make
reproducible builds working (or at least is needed for that, since that is
still to be checked if that works), along other fixes in compiler.
Thanks
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
escribió:
> Turns out my public key needed to be distributed to a keyserver.
>
>
>
> gpg --keyserver http://keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-keys <fingerprint>
>
>
>
> did the trick. You should see it now.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:22:56 PM
> *To:* dev@royale.apache.org <de...@royale.apache.org>
> *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
>
>
> Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on
> releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the folder.
> I’ll see if I can figure this out…
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
>
>
> https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrovira@apache.org
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > Ok Yishay,
> >
> > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
> >>
> >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> can we consider this vote finished?
> >>
> >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
> >> fixes will be not applied
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm wrong
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Harbs
> >> >
> >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler
> Build
> >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >> > >
> >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
> requirements
> >> > on approving a release?', at:
> >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> > >
> >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package
> completes
> >> > successfully
> >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >> > >
> >> > > The KEYS file is at
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >> > >
> >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> >> > >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >> > >
> >> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> >> > > +1 Approve the release
> >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >> > >
> >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote passes if there is:
> >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >> > >
> >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will
> be
> >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in
> the
> >> RC,
> >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> >> that
> >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
> >> PMC
> >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> >> votes
> >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >> > >
> >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and
> AIR
> >> > version you tested with.
> >> > >
> >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the
> common
> >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> >> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> >> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> >> > > 3) run the script:
> >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >> > >
> >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> >> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION
> thread
> >> > not this VOTE thread.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Yishay Weiss
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
> *From: *Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
> *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:23 PM
> *To: *dev@royale.apache.org
> *Subject: *RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
>
>
> Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on
> releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the folder.
> I’ll see if I can figure this out…
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
>
>
> https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrovira@apache.org
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > Ok Yishay,
> >
> > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
> >>
> >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> can we consider this vote finished?
> >>
> >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
> >> fixes will be not applied
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm wrong
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Harbs
> >> >
> >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler
> Build
> >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >> > >
> >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
> requirements
> >> > on approving a release?', at:
> >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> > >
> >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package
> completes
> >> > successfully
> >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >> > >
> >> > > The KEYS file is at
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >> > >
> >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> >> > >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >> > >
> >> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> >> > > +1 Approve the release
> >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >> > >
> >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote passes if there is:
> >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >> > >
> >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will
> be
> >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in
> the
> >> RC,
> >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> >> that
> >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
> >> PMC
> >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> >> votes
> >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >> > >
> >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and
> AIR
> >> > version you tested with.
> >> > >
> >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the
> common
> >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> >> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> >> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> >> > > 3) run the script:
> >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >> > >
> >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> >> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION
> thread
> >> > not this VOTE thread.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Yishay Weiss
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
ok Yishay,
now I see it in central :)
about your question on why we should use 1.2.0. Maven has build tools as an
artifact, so using 1.1.0 will make people using the old source code no
matter what you have in source. That is one of the features of Maven that
all artifacts and its versions are officially stored in a central repo so
all people knows that they are using the right bits. If you build with Ant,
that will work since Ant just build from the sources you have and does not
have a concept of dependencies coming from a trusted source.
In this particular case the fix introduced in 1.2.0 was to make
reproducible builds working (or at least is needed for that, since that is
still to be checked if that works), along other fixes in compiler.
Thanks
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
escribió:
> Turns out my public key needed to be distributed to a keyserver.
>
>
>
> gpg --keyserver http://keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-keys <fingerprint>
>
>
>
> did the trick. You should see it now.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:22:56 PM
> *To:* dev@royale.apache.org <de...@royale.apache.org>
> *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
>
>
> Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on
> releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the folder.
> I’ll see if I can figure this out…
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
>
>
> https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrovira@apache.org
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > Ok Yishay,
> >
> > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
> >>
> >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> can we consider this vote finished?
> >>
> >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
> >> fixes will be not applied
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm wrong
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Harbs
> >> >
> >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler
> Build
> >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >> > >
> >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
> requirements
> >> > on approving a release?', at:
> >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> > >
> >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package
> completes
> >> > successfully
> >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >> > >
> >> > > The KEYS file is at
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >> > >
> >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> >> > >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >> > >
> >> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> >> > > +1 Approve the release
> >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >> > >
> >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote passes if there is:
> >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >> > >
> >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will
> be
> >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in
> the
> >> RC,
> >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> >> that
> >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
> >> PMC
> >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> >> votes
> >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >> > >
> >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and
> AIR
> >> > version you tested with.
> >> > >
> >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the
> common
> >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> >> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> >> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> >> > > 3) run the script:
> >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >> > >
> >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> >> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION
> thread
> >> > not this VOTE thread.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Yishay Weiss
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
> *From: *Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
> *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:23 PM
> *To: *dev@royale.apache.org
> *Subject: *RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
>
>
> Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on
> releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the folder.
> I’ll see if I can figure this out…
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
>
>
> https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrovira@apache.org
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > Ok Yishay,
> >
> > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
> >>
> >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ca...@apache.org>>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <de...@royale.apache.org>>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> can we consider this vote finished?
> >>
> >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
> >> fixes will be not applied
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm wrong
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Harbs
> >> >
> >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler
> Build
> >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >> > >
> >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
> requirements
> >> > on approving a release?', at:
> >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> > >
> >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package
> completes
> >> > successfully
> >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >> > >
> >> > > The KEYS file is at
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >> > >
> >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> >> > >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >> > >
> >> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> >> > > +1 Approve the release
> >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >> > >
> >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote passes if there is:
> >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >> > >
> >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will
> be
> >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in
> the
> >> RC,
> >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> >> that
> >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
> >> PMC
> >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> >> votes
> >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >> > >
> >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and
> AIR
> >> > version you tested with.
> >> > >
> >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the
> common
> >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> >> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> >> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> >> > > 3) run the script:
> >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >> > >
> >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> >> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION
> thread
> >> > not this VOTE thread.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Yishay Weiss
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Turns out my public key needed to be distributed to a keyserver.
gpg --keyserver http://keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-keys <fingerprint>
did the trick. You should see it now.
From: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:22:56 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org <de...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the folder. I’ll see if I can figure this out…
From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<ca...@apache.org>)
escribió:
> Ok Yishay,
>
> and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
>>
>> From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> can we consider this vote finished?
>>
>> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
>> fixes will be not applied
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
>> escribió:
>>
>> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
>> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
>> >
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
>> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
>> > >
>> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
>> > on approving a release?', at:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> > >
>> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
>> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
>> > successfully
>> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
>> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
>> > >
>> > > The KEYS file is at
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
>> > >
>> > > Please vote to approve this release:
>> > > +1 Approve the release
>> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> > >
>> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> > >
>> > > The vote passes if there is:
>> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
>> > >
>> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
>> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
>> RC,
>> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
>> that
>> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
>> PMC
>> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
>> votes
>> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>> > >
>> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>> > version you tested with.
>> > >
>> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
>> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> > > 1) create an empty folder,
>> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
>> > > 3) run the script:
>> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
>> > >
>> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
>> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
>> > >
>> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
>> > not this VOTE thread.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Yishay Weiss
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:23 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the folder. I’ll see if I can figure this out…
From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<ca...@apache.org>)
escribió:
> Ok Yishay,
>
> and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
>>
>> From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> can we consider this vote finished?
>>
>> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
>> fixes will be not applied
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
>> escribió:
>>
>> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
>> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
>> >
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
>> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
>> > >
>> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
>> > on approving a release?', at:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> > >
>> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
>> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
>> > successfully
>> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
>> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
>> > >
>> > > The KEYS file is at
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
>> > >
>> > > Please vote to approve this release:
>> > > +1 Approve the release
>> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> > >
>> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> > >
>> > > The vote passes if there is:
>> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
>> > >
>> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
>> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
>> RC,
>> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
>> that
>> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
>> PMC
>> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
>> votes
>> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>> > >
>> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>> > version you tested with.
>> > >
>> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
>> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> > > 1) create an empty folder,
>> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
>> > > 3) run the script:
>> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
>> > >
>> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
>> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
>> > >
>> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
>> > not this VOTE thread.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Yishay Weiss
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the folder. I’ll see if I can figure this out…
From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<ca...@apache.org>)
escribió:
> Ok Yishay,
>
> and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
>>
>> From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> can we consider this vote finished?
>>
>> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
>> fixes will be not applied
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
>> escribió:
>>
>> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
>> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
>> >
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
>> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
>> > >
>> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
>> > on approving a release?', at:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> > >
>> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
>> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
>> > successfully
>> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
>> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
>> > >
>> > > The KEYS file is at
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
>> > >
>> > > Please vote to approve this release:
>> > > +1 Approve the release
>> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> > >
>> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> > >
>> > > The vote passes if there is:
>> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
>> > >
>> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
>> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
>> RC,
>> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
>> that
>> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
>> PMC
>> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
>> votes
>> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>> > >
>> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>> > version you tested with.
>> > >
>> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
>> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> > > 1) create an empty folder,
>> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
>> > > 3) run the script:
>> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
>> > >
>> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
>> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
>> > >
>> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
>> > not this VOTE thread.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Yishay Weiss
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central
https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (<ca...@apache.org>)
escribió:
> Ok Yishay,
>
> and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
>>
>> From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> can we consider this vote finished?
>>
>> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
>> fixes will be not applied
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
>> escribió:
>>
>> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
>> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
>> >
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
>> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
>> > >
>> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
>> > on approving a release?', at:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> > >
>> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
>> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
>> > successfully
>> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
>> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
>> > >
>> > > The KEYS file is at
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
>> > >
>> > > Please vote to approve this release:
>> > > +1 Approve the release
>> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> > >
>> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> > >
>> > > The vote passes if there is:
>> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
>> > >
>> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
>> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
>> RC,
>> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
>> that
>> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
>> PMC
>> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
>> votes
>> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>> > >
>> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>> > version you tested with.
>> > >
>> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
>> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> > > 1) create an empty folder,
>> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
>> > > 3) run the script:
>> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
>> > >
>> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
>> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
>> > >
>> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
>> > not this VOTE thread.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Yishay Weiss
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Ok Yishay,
and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process?
thanks
El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> Hi
>
> can we consider this vote finished?
>
> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
> fixes will be not applied
>
> Maybe I'm wrong
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> > >
> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
> > on approving a release?', at:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > >
> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> > successfully
> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> > >
> > > The KEYS file is at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> > >
> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > > +1 Approve the release
> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> > >
> > > The vote passes if there is:
> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> > >
> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
> RC,
> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> that
> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> votes
> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> > >
> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> > version you tested with.
> > >
> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > > 3) run the script:
> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> > >
> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> > packages and build results are always encouraged.
> > >
> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> > not this VOTE thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yishay Weiss
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Carlos,
It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet.
From: Carlos Rovira<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Hi
can we consider this vote finished?
also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
fixes will be not applied
Maybe I'm wrong
Thanks
El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >
> > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
> on approving a release?', at:
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> successfully
> > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >
> > The KEYS file is at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >
> > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > +1 Approve the release
> > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >
> > The vote passes if there is:
> > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >
> > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
> folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >
> > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
> >
> > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > 1) create an empty folder,
> > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > 3) run the script:
> > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >
> > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> packages and build results are always encouraged.
> >
> > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> not this VOTE thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi
can we consider this vote finished?
also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the
fixes will be not applied
Maybe I'm wrong
Thanks
El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<ha...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are
> over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >
> > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
> on approving a release?', at:
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> successfully
> > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >
> > The KEYS file is at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >
> > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > +1 Approve the release
> > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >
> > The vote passes if there is:
> > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >
> > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
> folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >
> > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
> >
> > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > 1) create an empty folder,
> > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > 3) run the script:
> > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >
> > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> packages and build results are always encouraged.
> >
> > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> not this VOTE thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-)
Harbs
> On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - SHA and signed packages are correct
> - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes successfully
> - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
>
> The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> 3) run the script:
> ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
Re: [RESULT] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Congrats! :)
We now continue with the real release :)
Thanks all
El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:21, Yishay Weiss (<yi...@hotmail.com>)
escribió:
> Vote passes with 4 +1 votes. Thanks to all who took the time.
>
> From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 10:50 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
>
> +1
> Package
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip
> Java 1.8
> OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: y
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
> No unapproved binaries in source package: y
>
> Package
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2.0.jar
> Binary signatures match: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:01 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Package
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools
> > -1.2.0-source-release.zip
> > <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip
> >
> > Java 9
> > OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
> > Source kit signatures match: y
> > Source kit builds: y
> > README is ok: ${readme.ok}
> > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: ${releasenotes.ok}
> > NOTICE is ok: y
> > LICENSE is ok: y
> > No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
> > No unapproved binaries in source package: y
> >
> > Package
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2
> > .
> > 0.jar
> > Binary signatures match: y
> > NOTICE is ok: y
> > LICENSE is ok: y
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:25 PM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> > > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> > >
> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements
> on
> > > approving a release?', at:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > >
> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> > > successfully
> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> > >
> > > The KEYS file is at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> > >
> > > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > > +1 Approve the release
> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> > >
> > > The vote passes if there is:
> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > > - More positive votes than negative votes
> > >
> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> > > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
> > RC,
> > > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> > that
> > > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in
> PMC
> > > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> > votes
> > > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> > >
> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> > > version you tested with.
> > >
> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> > > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> > > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > > 1) create an empty folder,
> > > 2) download into that folder this file:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > > 3) run the script:
> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> > >
> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> packages
> > > and build results are always encouraged.
> > >
> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> not
> > > this VOTE thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yishay Weiss
> >
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
[RESULT] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Vote passes with 4 +1 votes. Thanks to all who took the time.
From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 10:50 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip
Java 1.8
OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
No unapproved binaries in source package: y
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2.0.jar
Binary signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:01 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> +1
> Package
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools
> -1.2.0-source-release.zip
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip>
> Java 9
> OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: ${readme.ok}
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: ${releasenotes.ok}
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
> No unapproved binaries in source package: y
>
> Package
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2
> .
> 0.jar
> Binary signatures match: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:25 PM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >
> > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> > approving a release?', at:
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> > successfully
> > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >
> > The KEYS file is at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >
> > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > +1 Approve the release
> > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >
> > The vote passes if there is:
> > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >
> > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
> RC,
> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> that
> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> votes
> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >
> > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> > version you tested with.
> >
> > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > 1) create an empty folder,
> > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > 3) run the script:
> > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >
> > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> > and build results are always encouraged.
> >
> > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> > this VOTE thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Greg Dove <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip
Java 1.8
OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
No unapproved binaries in source package: y
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2.0.jar
Binary signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:01 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> +1
> Package
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools
> -1.2.0-source-release.zip
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip>
> Java 9
> OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: ${readme.ok}
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: ${releasenotes.ok}
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
> No unapproved binaries in source package: y
>
> Package
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2
> .
> 0.jar
> Binary signatures match: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:25 PM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
> >
> > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> > approving a release?', at:
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > - SHA and signed packages are correct
> > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> > successfully
> > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
> >
> > The KEYS file is at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
> >
> > Maven artifacts are staged here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > +1 Approve the release
> > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >
> > The vote passes if there is:
> > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> > - More positive votes than negative votes
> >
> > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the
> RC,
> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality
> that
> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their
> votes
> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
> >
> > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> > version you tested with.
> >
> > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> > 1) create an empty folder,
> > 2) download into that folder this file:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> > 3) run the script:
> > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
> >
> > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> > and build results are always encouraged.
> >
> > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> > this VOTE thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>.
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools
-1.2.0-source-release.zip
Java 9
OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: ${readme.ok}
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: ${releasenotes.ok}
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
No unapproved binaries in source package: y
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2
.
0.jar
Binary signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:25 PM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - SHA and signed packages are correct
> - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> successfully
> - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
>
> The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
> folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> 3) run the script:
> ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
+1
Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip
Java 1.8
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.15.3
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: ${readme.ok}
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: ${releasenotes.ok}
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y
No unapproved binaries in source package: y
Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2.0.jar
Binary signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
On 4/13/20, 1:25 PM, "apacheroyaleci@gmail.com" <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2Fcompiler-build-tools%2F1.2.0%2Frc3%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9a20aef1f286470f9e8208d7dfe8d92e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637224063475812378&sdata=PlejZrlgFR9QjOE72kbxkkqsvviEca9nvBnNnDiGo50%3D&reserved=0
Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?', at:
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9a20aef1f286470f9e8208d7dfe8d92e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637224063475812378&sdata=58y%2FWUvXrTjjJg571Oz%2FiU5C5lP7qE4t6bBklkKOrpE%3D&reserved=0
At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
- SHA and signed packages are correct
- NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
- That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes successfully
- That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
The KEYS file is at https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2FKEYS&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9a20aef1f286470f9e8208d7dfe8d92e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637224063475812378&sdata=bqBeWMn2C3h7mUaLhv%2FaN9SRf34YOhImKBUW1qfId3o%3D&reserved=0
Maven artifacts are staged here:
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapacheroyale-1064&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9a20aef1f286470f9e8208d7dfe8d92e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637224063475812378&sdata=wQr%2FCjzSLInKtuFLXFUF6nbihs%2BT6%2BBk8UamiehVQr0%3D&reserved=0
Please vote to approve this release:
+1 Approve the release
-1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
The vote passes if there is:
- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
- More positive votes than negative votes
Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR version you tested with.
For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
1) create an empty folder,
2) download into that folder this file:
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2Fcompiler-build-tools%2F1.2.0%2Frc3%2FApproveBuildTools.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9a20aef1f286470f9e8208d7dfe8d92e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637224063475812378&sdata=kABovizQZ6HpSj8qpkrnJyNzf6lBQ0LuuD0vV6artjc%3D&reserved=0
3) run the script:
ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages and build results are always encouraged.
Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread.
Thanks,
Yishay Weiss
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
+1 (Binding)
- Package:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.0-source-release.zip
- Java: 1.8.0_181
- OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.15.3
- Signatures fine (againts https://downloads.apache.org/royale/KEYS )
- Hashes fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source with test
- Check In actual Apache Royale development branch
- Tested Tour De Jewel example working as expected
Thanks
El lun., 13 abr. 2020 a las 22:25, <ap...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Hi,
> This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build
> Tools. The release candidate can be found here;
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - SHA and signed packages are correct
> - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes
> successfully
> - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of
> compiler-build-tools and build the compiler.
>
> The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
> folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml
> 3) run the script:
> ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira