You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by "Benoit Wiart (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/03/08 22:17:56 UTC

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-2186) OutOfMemory provoked by Cache overflow

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680015#action_12680015 ] 

benoitw edited comment on OFBIZ-2186 at 3/8/09 2:17 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

M. Jones,

CacheLineTable and LRUMap do not synchronize on the same lock
- CacheLineTable synchronization use the CacheLineTable instance monitor
- LRUMap synchronization use the LRUMap instance monitor

the LRUMap (memoryTable) can be updated concurrently by 2 differents threads
- one in the CacheLineTable #put or CacheLineTable#remove
- another in the CacheLineTable#get

this leads to the corruption of the LRUMap which is not thread-safe

the CacheLineTable#get should be synchronized or the LRUMap should be replaced by a thead safe collection

Benoit Wiart
www.ubik-ingenierie.com

      was (Author: benoitw):
    M. Jones,

CacheLineTable and LRUMap do not synchronize on the same lock
- CacheLineTable synchronization use the CacheLineTable instance monitor
- LRUMap synchronization use the LRUMap instance monitor

the LRUMap (memoryTable) can be updated concurrently by 2 differents threads (or more than 2)
- one in the CacheLineTable #put or CacheLineTable#remove
- another in the CacheLineTable#get

this leads to the corruption of the LRUMap which is not thread-safe

the CacheLineTable#get should be synchronized or the LRUMap should be replaced by a thead safe collection

Benoit Wiart
www.ubik-ingenierie.com
  
> OutOfMemory provoked by Cache overflow
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-2186
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2186
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: framework
>    Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0
>         Environment: Linux, JDK 1.5_15, Xmx set to 1156Mo
>            Reporter: Philippe Mouawad
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: CacheLineTable-patch.txt, OfbizBug.zip
>
>
> In our production system, we had an OutOfMemoryError.
> I analyzed the generated Heap Dump and found the following:
> The cache entitycache.entity-list.default.ProductCategoryMember retains a heap of 369314128 Bytes.
> The LRUMap hold by this object is occupying this space (369314128) and this object has a stange state:
> - maxSize is set to 5000 (as set in the cache.properties)
> - size is 128930 => PROBLEM
> IN cache.properties:
> entitycache.entity-list.default.ProductCategoryMember.expireTime=3600000
> entitycache.entity-list.default.ProductCategoryMember.useSoftReference=true
> entitycache.entity-list.default.ProductCategoryMember.maxInMemory=5000
> entitycache.entity-list.default.ProductCategoryMember.maxSize=7500
> I analyzed the code of LRUMap and its usage in CacheLineTable and IMHO the bug is a missing synchonized  in get():
> public CacheLine<V> get(Object key) {
>         if (key == null) {
>             if (Debug.verboseOn()) Debug.logVerbose("In CacheLineTable tried to get with null key, using NullObject" + this.cacheName, module);
>         }
>         return getNoCheck(key);
>     }
> Since LRUMap extends LinkedHashMap, if you look at get method, it changes the state of the Map by calling e.recordAccess(this):
>     public V get(Object key) {
>         Entry<K,V> e = (Entry<K,V>)getEntry(key);
>         if (e == null)
>             return null;
>         e.recordAccess(this);
>         return e.value;
>     }
> So the default of synchronization corrupts the state of LRUMap which grows indefinitely
> I will submit a patch for this on the trunk.
> Philippe
> www.ubik-ingenierie.com

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.