You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> on 2013/12/10 02:18:22 UTC
Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
For trunk, are we going to support hadoop 1.0 ?
Cheers
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:01 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for defaulting to Hadoop 2.
> At Salesforce we run 0.94 with Hadoop 2 anyway :)
>
> -1 (or maybe -0) for removing Hadoop 1 support. Lot's folks will have a
> lot of data in Hadoop 1 that they do not want to touch.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
>
>
> +1 on making hadoop-2 default for 0.98
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98.
> >
> > I am not so sure about dropping support for hadoop-1 this early. We do
> not
> > want Hbase users stuck on earlier HBase versions, because they cannot
> > update their hadoops.
> >
> > Enis
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe
> > > > even just drop it in 0.98?
> > > >
> > >
> > > +1 deprecate
> > > +0 drop
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
drop hadoop1 from 0.98? (-1 from andrew)
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> There are two things being discussed here -- can we clarify where folks
> stand on this? Here's how I'm interpreting it (please correct).
>
> deprecate hadoop1 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from stack, ted, enis, larsh,
> andrew, amandeep)
> default to hadoop2 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from ted, larsh)
> drop hadoop1 from trunk? (-1 from enis, stack, andrew)
> drop hadoop1 from 0.98?
> drop hadoop1 from 1.0? (-1 from larsh)
>
> Relatedly -- is 1.0 going to be off of 0.98.x or a new compat breaking
> release of the current trunk?
>
> My votes are:
> +1 to deprecate on 0.98 and trunk
> +1 to default to hadoop2 on 0.98 and trunk
> +0 drop from trunk. (if 1.0 is off of 0.98, +1 drop from trunk)
> -1 drop from 0.98
>
> Jon.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For trunk, are we going to support hadoop 1.0 ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:01 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for defaulting to Hadoop 2.
> > > At Salesforce we run 0.94 with Hadoop 2 anyway :)
> > >
> > > -1 (or maybe -0) for removing Hadoop 1 support. Lot's folks will have a
> > > lot of data in Hadoop 1 that they do not want to touch.
> > >
> > > -- Lars
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 on making hadoop-2 default for 0.98
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98.
> > > >
> > > > I am not so sure about dropping support for hadoop-1 this early. We
> do
> > > not
> > > > want Hbase users stuck on earlier HBase versions, because they cannot
> > > > update their hadoops.
> > > >
> > > > Enis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe
> > > > > > even just drop it in 0.98?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 deprecate
> > > > > +0 drop
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> There are two things being discussed here -- can we clarify where folks
> stand on this? Here's how I'm interpreting it (please correct).
>
> deprecate hadoop1 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from stack, ted, enis, larsh,
> andrew, amandeep)
> default to hadoop2 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from ted, larsh)
> drop hadoop1 from trunk? (-1 from enis, stack, andrew)
> drop hadoop1 from 0.98?
> drop hadoop1 from 1.0? (-1 from larsh)
>
> Relatedly -- is 1.0 going to be off of 0.98.x or a new compat breaking
> release of the current trunk?
>
> My votes are:
> +1 to deprecate on 0.98 and trunk
> +1 to default to hadoop2 on 0.98 and trunk
> +0 drop from trunk. (if 1.0 is off of 0.98, +1 drop from trunk)
> -1 drop from 0.98
>
What you are voting for is what is currently checked absent dropping h1
from trunk (That should be post 1.0 IMO).
St.Ack
Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
There are two things being discussed here -- can we clarify where folks
stand on this? Here's how I'm interpreting it (please correct).
deprecate hadoop1 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from stack, ted, enis, larsh,
andrew, amandeep)
default to hadoop2 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from ted, larsh)
drop hadoop1 from trunk? (-1 from enis, stack, andrew)
drop hadoop1 from 0.98?
drop hadoop1 from 1.0? (-1 from larsh)
Relatedly -- is 1.0 going to be off of 0.98.x or a new compat breaking
release of the current trunk?
My votes are:
+1 to deprecate on 0.98 and trunk
+1 to default to hadoop2 on 0.98 and trunk
+0 drop from trunk. (if 1.0 is off of 0.98, +1 drop from trunk)
-1 drop from 0.98
Jon.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For trunk, are we going to support hadoop 1.0 ?
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:01 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 for defaulting to Hadoop 2.
> > At Salesforce we run 0.94 with Hadoop 2 anyway :)
> >
> > -1 (or maybe -0) for removing Hadoop 1 support. Lot's folks will have a
> > lot of data in Hadoop 1 that they do not want to touch.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
> >
> >
> > +1 on making hadoop-2 default for 0.98
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98.
> > >
> > > I am not so sure about dropping support for hadoop-1 this early. We do
> > not
> > > want Hbase users stuck on earlier HBase versions, because they cannot
> > > update their hadoops.
> > >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe
> > > > > even just drop it in 0.98?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 deprecate
> > > > +0 drop
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com